FC3 Wishlist

No brain spam..

The reason and logic want that if FC3 planes are completely abandoned, which still represents currently 90% of playable "RED" forces in DCS, fewer and fewer players will play them !!

And for what reason we will abandon them on the pretext that they are inexpensive and simplified planes and therefore the community that plays them you have nothing to say ?

And so what does that mean, that to be well seen we all played clickable American planes between us? And make only RED FLAG scenarios with an a Agressor team... ?

The improvements I propose are very easy to do and coding for the ED DEV. .

In addition to Kuznetsov and R-27 we also know that Deka will add an MFI-55 instead of the current DL in the J-11A, you can see a video of it on their YouTube. They plan to do that so it can be sold individually, maybe there’s a few other things they’ll change

''Redfor conspiracies everywhere''

Stop slamming the MiG down Pepin, and you won't have this ''50% accident rate''. Fly it how you're supposed to fly it. And stop blaming conspiracies. You people are laughable with this nonsense.

Satarosa, you're asking for features that were never intended to be in them in the first place, necessitating creation from scratch development. ''Oh, it's not MUCH just blah blah blah''.

If you want a fully simulated aircraft, don't use a simplified aircraft created 10+ years ago. Easy. ''But it doesn't have muh favorites available'' yeah, that's life.

To the contrary...

No need to be agitated and rude zhukov032186.

OP has got valid points and this is wishlist item.

I flew A-10C and now flying F-18C, occasionally MiG-29 and Su-33 - that would change if these PFM/SSM modules were given at least animated primary cockpit controls - ever tried navigation with MiG-29?

Plus these aircraft are not 10 years old mate, those ones were replaced with the new visuals and PFM not so long ago.

''Redfor conspiracies everywhere''

Stop slamming the MiG down Pepin, and you won't have this ''50% accident rate''. Fly it how you're supposed to fly it. And stop blaming conspiracies. You people are laughable with this nonsense.

 

Satarosa, you're asking for features that were never intended to be in them in the first place, necessitating creation from scratch development. ''Oh, it's not MUCH just blah blah blah''.

 

If you want a fully simulated aircraft, don't use a simplified aircraft created 10+ years ago. Easy. ''But it doesn't have muh favorites available'' yeah, that's life.

You don’t have right to tell the people how they must think or write things in your favor way of thinking. The most you can do is stay away of the thread.

We are talking about datalink in Su-27 and Su-33, we don’t know why only J-11 have onboard share datalink.

Also why the people here are free to mocking the users that request stuff for Russian fighters?