Jump to content

Announcing Tu-22M3 Troika by Black Cat Simulations


Recommended Posts

The one we used was quite accurate, but needed reference stickers put on the surfaces to produce a good scan.

 

It was handheld and used for much of the same work as briainacooper11 is going to perform.

 

So quite accurate depictions of areas were possible to produce, but you still had to make quite extensive work to get proper 3D drawings out of it.

System specs:

 

Gigabyte Aorus Master, i7 9700K@std, GTX 1080TI OC, 32 GB 3000 MHz RAM, NVMe M.2 SSD, Oculus Quest VR (2x1600x1440)

Warthog HOTAS w/150mm extension, Slaw pedals, Gametrix Jetseat, TrackIR for monitor use

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A trip to Ukraine would be awesome, it's a dream of mine. Will you be posting pictures of the cities and such or just the museum scans?

PC Specs: i7 4790 (non K), MSI GTX 980, 1TB Seagate HDD, 32GB Crucial DDR3-1600MHz RAM, 3 Samsung 1920x1080 monitors, EVGA 850W G2 PSU

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We will definitely be telling the story of the entire trip with photos, etc. For me, it is a once in a lifetime thing. Although it is probably my favorite part of the world excepting my home in North America, I am never going to be able to travel to Eastern Europe/Russia very much.

 

I don't expect the 3D scanner to be a complete solution to the task of modeling the subject components. My hope/educated guess is that it provides a substantial net reduction in overall time and expense, and is a help to the modelers. It is not something I want to build a trade secret for Black Cat around, so I intend to share some data, tips, and the overall strengths and weaknesses with others. If it is a complete disaster, I will share that too, but I'm 99% convinced it's going to work well.

 

Brian

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I count on you Brian, i really want this project to go on as i am a big fan of the Backfire. I will continue to support you until the module is released!

Mig-21 - Mig 15 - Mi-8 - F-86 - FC3 - Ka-50 - CA - L39 - Hawk - M2K - NTTR - A10C - FW190 - L39 - F-5E - AJS 37 - Normandy - F/A-18C - Persian Gulf -

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Thank you kobac, I am at the airport on my way to Kiev now! Will be stopping in Poltava, and then on to Russia.

 

Thanks,

Brian

 

I hope to you guys become a 3rd party in the future, good luck on your project!:thumbup:

Mission: "To intercept and destroy aircraft and airborne missiles in all weather conditions in order to establish and maintain air superiority in a designated area. To deliver air-to-ground ordnance on time in any weather condition. And to provide tactical reconaissance imagery" - F-14 Tomcat Roll Call

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We`ve been doing alot of research and gathering huge amount of reference around 3k images a day :)

Thx to the great museum and it`s crew for continuous help and allowing us climb where ever we want!

So here we are! :)

http://imgur.com/a/p2KcK

 

P.S. The temprature conditions are around/above 30 degrees Celsius, so on one side it`s pleasant to work with a warm weather, on the other it`s really hot, sometimes we have luck with clouds, that allows us to shoot diffuse images without strong highlights :)


Edited by 3DArtistExtreme
  • Like 1

-=3DArtistExtreme=-

Modeling/UV mapping/Lighting/Shading/Texturing

3D Portfolio http://www.oleg-kovalev.com

FlyingIron Simulations

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, fantastic shots. This is a really cool project. Fingers crossed and the best of luck for you! ;)

Shagrat

 

- Flying Sims since 1984 -:pilotfly:

Win 10 | i5 10600K@4.1GHz | 64GB | GeForce RTX 3090 - Asus VG34VQL1B  | TrackIR5 | Simshaker & Jetseat | VPForce Rhino Base & VIRPIL T50 CM2 Stick on 200mm curved extension | VIRPIL T50 CM2 Throttle | VPC Rotor TCS Plus/Apache64 Grip | MFG Crosswind Rudder Pedals | WW Top Gun MIP | a hand made AHCP | 2x Elgato StreamDeck (Buttons galore)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice!

Mission: "To intercept and destroy aircraft and airborne missiles in all weather conditions in order to establish and maintain air superiority in a designated area. To deliver air-to-ground ordnance on time in any weather condition. And to provide tactical reconaissance imagery" - F-14 Tomcat Roll Call

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow Oleg's Site is awesome, He is a phenomenal 3D Artist.

MSI R9 280X 6GB x2 Crossfire /ASUS M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Mobo/AMD FX 4170 Bulldozer 4core CPU/RAM Kingston HyperX FURY 16GB/ Corsair RM 1000WATT PSU/Windows 10 Enterprise 64bit/ X52 & CH Pedals/ MSI DS502 GAMING Headset

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We did it!

 

Oleg and I had a successful trip in Ukraine. Most of our activity was at the museum in Kyiv (Kiev, take your pick). This was the first time they had opened up the cockpits since receiving the aircraft, I am told. All of the locals remembered when the US came in and paid for all the Tu-22M's and Tu-160's to be cut up. It was heartbreaking for them (me too), and I think they were grateful for all the attention we gave their Backfires. I think they liked the opportunity to peek inside, too. The cockpits were in exceptionally good condition. All of the windows, including those for forward visibility, have roll-up shields against nuclear blasts, and they were all in place, so the sun had no opportunity to degrade anything. When the aircraft was delivered to the museum, only one or two black boxes were removed from the rear, and I think the front was untouched. They gutted the avionics bay, though. I believe one box removed was the control panel for launching Kh-15's, but there are pix on the internet of that, so it's fair game :music_whistling:

 

We took two approaches 'scanning' the cockpits. One was normal photogrammetry using the thousands of pictures Oleg took. The other are the direct scans using my Artec Eva scanner. We took some quick looks which were promising, but both methods require a lot of time post processing. to get good results. Oleg was upside down taking pictures of the space/junk between cockpits, and his photogrammetry software picked it up, so the final model should be good.

 

Oleg left before I went to Poltava to look at more stuff and talk to the crewmembers, but he didn't miss anything. The Poltava Long Range Aviation Museum is now closed to foreigners, so I didn't get to see anything. I also caught 'travelers butt' and didn't meet personally with the Tu-22M3 crewmembers, though I will be in touch with them.

 

The State Aviation Museum in Kyiv was very professional, and provided substantial assistance in terms of aircraft access, information, manpower, etc. We are definitely going to help out the museum with a portion of sales, and it's going to be an ongoing partnership. For those who donated, know that I gave $1000 upfront, so that's where all the money collected so far went.

 

As far as documentation, I did get some more, but not everything. Having crewmembers to consult is a huge gain, however, and there is enough information to make a simulation with the performance and handling fidelity I wanted when I started this project.

 

So, what was the airplane like? When you look at it next to the Tu-142 (navy Tu-95), it doesn't look so big for a bomber. When you compare it to an F-15 or MiG-25 in your head, it appears absolutely huge. My mind went back and forth. Sitting in the front feels like an airliner with poor visibility and a pointy nose. The rear feels like being in a submarine, especially if the 'shades' are drawn. Not claustrophobic, at least for me. Everything felt sturdy, strong. There are switches everywhere, in places you can't even see when seated. You just have to know where they are.

 

Little things strike you. The nuclear blast shields on every window. Right next to a very sophisticated data link (for the time) is a big Morse code telegraph key. The rear crewmembers have little mirrors that let them see behind them. The tail gun controls are 'cool', and also identical to Tu-95. The Tu-22M2 has mounts for four JATO rockets (the M3 deletes these). The nosegear has brakes, though only used to hold back the aircraft on takeoff, when the engines are run up to full AB. There is some wood used, around the canopy sills. Some switches are mounted in rotatable boxes, to make space for more switches behind them (we're definitely not going to simulate everything!). They had a FAB-9000 on display that the M3 could carry. Big! Walking on the fuselage and wings, I was careful where I stepped, but it still felt like I couldn't hurt it. And to stand there and look at the M1, M2 and M3 in a row was beautiful.

 

Brian

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...