wavn Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 Thanks for your constructive post SVTONY :) Best regards, Willem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harle Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 How can anyone tell me there's not exaggeration going on when the module is being called "broke", because there's not an individual set of sound files for it yet? That's how https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=183154 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
firmek Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 That's how https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=183154 You do realize that you linked a thread with ASP issue... as a responce to the question how does not having individual sound files makes it broken.... F/A-18, F-16, F-14, M-2000C, A-10C, AV-8B, AJS-37 Viggen, F-5E-3, F-86F, MiG-21bis, MiG-15bis, L-39 Albatros, C-101 Aviojet, P-51D, Spitfire LF Mk. IX, Bf 109 4-K, UH-1H, Mi-8, Ka-50, NTTR, Normandy, Persian Gulf... and not enough time to fully enjoy it all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bogey Jammer Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 How do you know it's only an approximate rendition? I would argue that the product does match the description. This is taken directly from the Eagle Dynamics website: "Leatherneck Simulations' recreation of the MiG-21 is, by far, the most accurate and comprehensive simulation of this supersonic jet fighter to date." Isn't it? Is there a more realistic Mig-21 flight simulator I and others have missed out on? I mean, it can be the most accurate simulation to date while not being up to your standards, sure. That doesn't mean the product description is wrong though. This is purely cynical. Everybody knows by now where this module fails thanks to original documentation, just open your eyes and read the topics about them. This may be the best MiG-21 simulation ever, but it's not a valid excuse. Naive word play like this cannot hide the fact the care given to it is sub-standard (except graphics). After the years, people has lost patience and yes, it's threatened to be trashed and forgotten if another module comes out to fill the role. Thanks for your constructive post SVTONY :) I's not constructive but thanks for shining his shoes. 3 I'll buy : МиГ-23МЛД & МЛА МиГ-27К МиГ-25 Mirage III F-4E any IJ plane 1950' Korea Dynamic campaign module Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wavn Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 (edited) Pity you are so cynical / sarcastic, B J edit: after all, we are fellow hobbyists :) Edited February 25, 2018 by wavn 1 Best regards, Willem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kontiuka Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 Of course the AI flight members need similar performance to the player's flight model and more control over them is warranted.I think this is an issue with most modules since the AI will always use an SFM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cichlidfan Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 It's hard to blame anyone that the module had been developped over the time by three different teams. Except the primary code author has been the same throughout. ASUS ROG Maximus VIII Hero, i7-6700K, Noctua NH-D14 Cooler, Crucial 32GB DDR4 2133, Samsung 950 Pro NVMe 256GB, Samsung EVO 250GB & 500GB SSD, 2TB Caviar Black, Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme 8GB, Corsair HX1000i, Phillips BDM4065UC 40" 4k monitor, VX2258 TouchScreen, TIR 5 w/ProClip, TM Warthog, VKB Gladiator Pro, Saitek X56, et. al., MFG Crosswind Pedals #1199, VolairSim Pit, Rift CV1 :thumbup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MiG21bisFishbedL Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 And I thought bellyaching was reserved for LiveJournal and Tumblr. Reformers hate him! This one weird trick found by a bush pilot will make gunfighter obsessed old farts angry at your multi-role carrier deck line up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paradox Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 And I thought bellyaching was reserved for LiveJournal and Tumblr. Oh sweet summer child 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MiG21bisFishbedL Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 Oh sweet summer child I fully acknowledge my naivety. :cry: Reformers hate him! This one weird trick found by a bush pilot will make gunfighter obsessed old farts angry at your multi-role carrier deck line up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kontiuka Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 Oh sweet summer childlofl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frederf Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 I think this is an issue with most modules since the AI will always use an SFM. It is not. For A-10C AI values are within a few percent not hundreds of percent. MiG-21 is uniquely flawed in this area. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asla36 Posted February 24, 2018 Share Posted February 24, 2018 Agreed, playing as wingman with an AI lead in close formation is near impossible. Going fast on an intercept mission that is, the AI just seems to ignite his rockets indefinitely for a boost. :D DCS: MiG-23 [sIGPIC] [/sIGPIC] Make it happen, and take my money! :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts