FC3 Wishlist - Page 3 - ED Forums
 


Notices

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-16-2019, 06:20 AM   #21
Wolve03
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: New Delhi, India
Posts: 40
Default

+1 for the Request for bug-fixes to FC3 birds

I agree that for the sake of realism, we should have these systems implemented. Heck, we aren't asking for a better EW environment, or jammer triangulation through datalink, we simply ask for basic fixes.

Let's not forget that LOMAC and FC have brought us to DCSW. Are we forgetting our roots now? And I believe it's understood that MAC would be a separate product? Considering this, how can we have a competitive multiplayer environment if the red side has one hand tied behind their back? Indeed, I agree that the Blue side did not have datalink for more than a decade, even though the red side had it. But now that we are all moving forward, should we not focus on how best these functionality can be simulated and presented in game?

And the OP has also posted some of the very basic features, related to cockpit animations. As to the point of priority, have we forgotten how painful the inverted switches on the Ka-50 have been? You may consider them low priority but they are Quality-of-life items and can make a big difference in the experience

EDIT: And while we are here ... what about the J-11 / J-11A? Can't have a mishmash of both. So, for the sake of realism (which the sim professes), should we not have it only one way or the other?

Last edited by Wolve03; 09-16-2019 at 06:22 AM. Reason: Missed discussing the J-11
Wolve03 is offline  
Old 09-16-2019, 08:31 AM   #22
pepin1234
Senior Member
 
pepin1234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,770
Default

It is a nightmare fly in any Russian fighter. They downgrade powerful weapons used only by FC3 aircraft as Kh-29, this missiles can’t destroy a shelter or ammo depot even when this missile was specially designed to destroy heavy fortifications, they remove features without care nothing about the real life feature. Mig-29 is a 50% death trying to landing, we die more by accident than players actions. They were so fresh to add onboard share datalink only for J-11 ignoring Su-27 and Su-23.

We have tons of thread talking about all those issues and no reaction in any Sim updates. Wags having fun with new videos and we been destroying. Everything about Russian module fully of bugs without a fix. And then what? We set a name to all that and the people that always fight against Russian fighters came in evey thread that comment such situation defending the administration of the game. They are creating a very bad atmosphere even in the forum.
__________________

Last edited by pepin1234; 09-16-2019 at 08:44 AM.
pepin1234 is offline  
Old 09-16-2019, 08:51 AM   #23
Silver_Dragon
ED Translator
 
Silver_Dragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolve03 View Post
As to the point of priority, have we forgotten how painful the inverted switches on the Ka-50 have been? You may consider them low priority but they are Quality-of-life items and can make a big difference in the experience
Remember, ED has working on a Ka-50 upgrade.
https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php...&postcount=198
https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php...&postcount=205
__________________
More news to the front
Wishlist: ED / 3rd Party Campaings
My Rig: Intel I-5 750 2.67Ghz / Packard Bell FMP55 / 16 GB DDR3 RAM / GTX-1080 8 GB RAM / HD 1Tb/2Tb / Warthog / 2 MDF / TFPR

DCS: Roadmap (unofficial):https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=116893
DCS: List of Vacant models: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.p...91#post4076891
21Squad DCS: World News: https://www.facebook.com/21Squad-219508958071000/
Silver_Dragon Youtube

Last edited by Silver_Dragon; 09-16-2019 at 08:54 AM.
Silver_Dragon is offline  
Old 09-16-2019, 10:09 AM   #24
Wolve03
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: New Delhi, India
Posts: 40
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Silver_Dragon View Post
Yes, Thank you mate. Sidenote: I appreciate and love your work both on the forums and on YouTube. o7

I mentioned the Ka-50 only to draw attention to the slow speed of updates for the now-old-but-once-flagship products. This includes the A-10C as well. I feel that graphical overhauls should be secondary to quality-of-life and other upgrades which have a direct impact on gameplay. What started as "Lock On: Modern Air Combat" will eventually become a ground attack simulator if the combat aircraft aspects keep getting pushed back. I am aware of impending changes to missile logic etc. but we need a competitive multiplayer environment (I did not say "equal" ... I merely request for a realistic portrayal of the weapon systems and avionics, as we have in other modules).
Wolve03 is offline  
Old 09-16-2019, 01:32 PM   #25
Satarosa
Member
 
Satarosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 874
Thumbs up +1

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wolve03 View Post
+1 for the Request for bug-fixes to FC3 birds

I agree that for the sake of realism, we should have these systems implemented. Heck, we aren't asking for a better EW environment, or jammer triangulation through datalink, we simply ask for basic fixes.

Let's not forget that LOMAC and FC have brought us to DCSW. Are we forgetting our roots now? And I believe it's understood that MAC would be a separate product? Considering this, how can we have a competitive multiplayer environment if the red side has one hand tied behind their back? Indeed, I agree that the Blue side did not have datalink for more than a decade, even though the red side had it. But now that we are all moving forward, should we not focus on how best these functionality can be simulated and presented in game?

And the OP has also posted some of the very basic features, related to cockpit animations. As to the point of priority, have we forgotten how painful the inverted switches on the Ka-50 have been? You may consider them low priority but they are Quality-of-life items and can make a big difference in the experience

EDIT: And while we are here ... what about the J-11 / J-11A? Can't have a mishmash of both. So, for the sake of realism (which the sim professes), should we not have it only one way or the other?
+1
__________________
Real War, Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCs..._as=subscriber

Real War, Voice Chat: https://discord.gg/UGa3KMe

Satarosa is offline  
Old 09-16-2019, 01:48 PM   #26
Satarosa
Member
 
Satarosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 874
Red face No brain spam..

The reason and logic want that if FC3 planes are completely abandoned, which still represents currently 90% of playable "RED" forces in DCS, fewer and fewer players will play them !!

And for what reason we will abandon them on the pretext that they are inexpensive and simplified planes and therefore the community that plays them you have nothing to say ?

And so what does that mean, that to be well seen we all played clickable American planes between us? And make only RED FLAG scenarios with an a Agressor team... ?




The improvements I propose are very easy to do and coding for the ED DEV. .
__________________
Real War, Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCs..._as=subscriber

Real War, Voice Chat: https://discord.gg/UGa3KMe

Satarosa is offline  
Old 09-16-2019, 02:59 PM   #27
AeriaGloria
Senior Member
 
AeriaGloria's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: LA
Posts: 1,231
Default

In addition to Kuznetsov and R-27 we also know that Deka will add an MFI-55 instead of the current DL in the J-11A, you can see a video of it on their YouTube. They plan to do that so it can be sold individually, maybe there’s a few other things they’ll change
AeriaGloria is offline  
Old 09-16-2019, 03:33 PM   #28
zhukov032186
Senior Member
 
zhukov032186's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Fort Worth, Tx
Posts: 2,550
Default

''Redfor conspiracies everywhere''
Stop slamming the MiG down Pepin, and you won't have this ''50% accident rate''. Fly it how you're supposed to fly it. And stop blaming conspiracies. You people are laughable with this nonsense.

Satarosa, you're asking for features that were never intended to be in them in the first place, necessitating creation from scratch development. ''Oh, it's not MUCH just blah blah blah''.

If you want a fully simulated aircraft, don't use a simplified aircraft created 10+ years ago. Easy. ''But it doesn't have muh favorites available'' yeah, that's life.
__________________
Zhukov attacks *FORUM USER* with Legendary Trollsword!
*FORUM USER* Constitution save roll.... Fail!
*FORUM USER* afflicted with ''Hurt Feelz'', -1 Concentration for two rounds
zhukov032186 is offline  
Old 09-16-2019, 04:11 PM   #29
Gierasimov
Senior Member
 
Gierasimov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Undisclosed NATO country
Posts: 1,116
Thumbs down To the contrary...

No need to be agitated and rude zhukov032186.
OP has got valid points and this is wishlist item.
I flew A-10C and now flying F-18C, occasionally MiG-29 and Su-33 - that would change if these PFM/SSM modules were given at least animated primary cockpit controls - ever tried navigation with MiG-29?
Plus these aircraft are not 10 years old mate, those ones were replaced with the new visuals and PFM not so long ago.
Gierasimov is offline  
Old 09-16-2019, 04:21 PM   #30
pepin1234
Senior Member
 
pepin1234's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,770
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zhukov032186 View Post
''Redfor conspiracies everywhere''
Stop slamming the MiG down Pepin, and you won't have this ''50% accident rate''. Fly it how you're supposed to fly it. And stop blaming conspiracies. You people are laughable with this nonsense.

Satarosa, you're asking for features that were never intended to be in them in the first place, necessitating creation from scratch development. ''Oh, it's not MUCH just blah blah blah''.

If you want a fully simulated aircraft, don't use a simplified aircraft created 10+ years ago. Easy. ''But it doesn't have muh favorites available'' yeah, that's life.
You don’t have right to tell the people how they must think or write things in your favor way of thinking. The most you can do is stay away of the thread.
__________________
pepin1234 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:03 AM. vBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys. Powered by vBulletin®.
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.