Jump to content

Hornet Acceleration and Altitude


Horns

Recommended Posts

I'm trying to get a feel for what to expect from the Hornet's flight characteristics, so the questions below are framed to allow me to compare it to the Viggen. I know the Hornet is typically flown much higher but I may fly familiar Viggen-style strike missions while I get used to the new bird, and then work on adjusting to the Hornet's typical mission profile.

 

1. What is the Hornet's approximate max speed at sea level?

 

2. How does the Hornet's acceleration from 350 to 550 knots compare to the Viggen 650 to 1000 km/h?

 

3. Is the Hornet stable, maneuverable and responsive enough to employ at very low altitude (30 feet over flat terrain, 20 feet over ocean) at cruise speed?

 

4. What is the Hornet's usual operating altitude for A/A, A/G and moving between waypoints?

 

Thanks for reading.

 

 

Modules: [A-10C] [AJS 37] [AV8B N/A] [F-5E] [F-14] [F/A-18C] [FC3] [Ka-50] [M-2000C] [Mig-21 bis] [NTTR] [PG] [SC]

Intel i7-12700F, Nvidia GTX 3080, MSI MPG Z690 Carbon WiFi, 32GB DDR4 @ 1600 MHz, SteelSeries Apex Pro, Razer Basilisk 3

VKB Gunfighter 3 w/ F-14 grip, Thrustmaster Warthog throttle, Thrustmaster MFD Cougars x2, MFG Crosswind,

DSD Flight Series button controller, XK-24, Oculus Rift (HM-A)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All these figures would probably vary quite heavily with weight?

| i9 12900K |  64GB DDR5-6000 | STRIX RTX 4090 OC | LG 38GN950 38" |

| Hanns-G HT225HPB | TIR 5 & Varjo Aero | Virpil Throttle & Stick | TM TPRs |

You don't stop playing because you grow old, you grow old because you stop playing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All these figures would probably vary quite heavily with weight?

 

You may have a point. Can anyone advise what a standard strike mission loadout might be for the Hornet?

 

 

Modules: [A-10C] [AJS 37] [AV8B N/A] [F-5E] [F-14] [F/A-18C] [FC3] [Ka-50] [M-2000C] [Mig-21 bis] [NTTR] [PG] [SC]

Intel i7-12700F, Nvidia GTX 3080, MSI MPG Z690 Carbon WiFi, 32GB DDR4 @ 1600 MHz, SteelSeries Apex Pro, Razer Basilisk 3

VKB Gunfighter 3 w/ F-14 grip, Thrustmaster Warthog throttle, Thrustmaster MFD Cougars x2, MFG Crosswind,

DSD Flight Series button controller, XK-24, Oculus Rift (HM-A)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The f18 natops manual should have the info. Can't think of it off the top of my head though.

Owned: Ryzen 3900x, MSI AMD 470x mobo, 32gb 3200MHz ram, Gtx 1660 Ti, 970 Evo Plus 500GB, MsFFB2, TIR5, TMWH+18c Stick, MFG Crosswinds, Buttkicker/SSA, WinWing F-18C . Next is VR for simpit

Art Of The Kill:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To whom it may concern,

I am an idiot, unfortunately for the world, I have a internet connection and a fondness for beer....apologies for that.

Thank you for you patience.

 

 

Many people don't want the truth, they want constant reassurance that whatever misconception/fallacies they believe in are true..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The f18 natops manual should have the info. Can't think of it off the top of my head though.

 

Cheers. I have looked through the natops manual for flight envelope specifics and diagrams as well as loadout information, haven't found anything yet but I will keep looking.

 

 

Thanks, that does help a lot, that answers the question about acceleration and it also tells me that if I want decent speeds I'd better stick to the altitudes where the Hornet performs best.

  • Like 1

 

 

Modules: [A-10C] [AJS 37] [AV8B N/A] [F-5E] [F-14] [F/A-18C] [FC3] [Ka-50] [M-2000C] [Mig-21 bis] [NTTR] [PG] [SC]

Intel i7-12700F, Nvidia GTX 3080, MSI MPG Z690 Carbon WiFi, 32GB DDR4 @ 1600 MHz, SteelSeries Apex Pro, Razer Basilisk 3

VKB Gunfighter 3 w/ F-14 grip, Thrustmaster Warthog throttle, Thrustmaster MFD Cougars x2, MFG Crosswind,

DSD Flight Series button controller, XK-24, Oculus Rift (HM-A)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

According RW datas the hornet with 402 engine (max thrust, 2aim 9, 2aim 120, 60%fuel) accelerates:

 

at 5k ft from M0.8 to M1.08 in 21seconds.

at 20k ft from M0.8 to M1.2 in 34.6 seconds

at 35k ft from M0.8 to M1.2 in 55.8 seconds

 

I can see 2 possibilities how this test was done:

 

1) steady flight at M0.8 and test altitude. In that case the dcs f18 performs.

 

at 5k ft from M0.8 to M1.08 in 24.8seconds (+3.8sec).

at 20k ft from M0.8 to M1.2 in 39.2 seconds (+4.6sec)

at 35k ft from M0.8 to M1.2 in 62.2 seconds (+6.4sec).

 

2) acceleration from below tested speed thru the speed range. In that case results in dcs are as follows

 

at 5k ft from M0.8 to M1.08 in 22.5seconds (+1.5sec).

at 20k ft from M0.8 to M1.2 in 35.8 seconds (+1.2 sec)

at 35k ft from M0.8 to M1.2 in 58.5 seconds (+2.7 sec)

 

Does anybody know how those tests are done rw?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3. Is the Hornet stable, maneuverable and responsive enough to employ at very low altitude (30 feet over flat terrain, 20 feet over ocean) at cruise speed?

Nope. Still suffers from the suck-down-phenomenon at very low altitude.

i7-7700K 4.2GHz, 16GB, GTX 1070 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According RW datas the hornet with 402 engine (max thrust, 2aim 9, 2aim 120, 60%fuel) accelerates:

 

at 5k ft from M0.8 to M1.08 in 21seconds.

at 20k ft from M0.8 to M1.2 in 34.6 seconds

at 35k ft from M0.8 to M1.2 in 55.8 seconds

 

I can see 2 possibilities how this test was done:

 

1) steady flight at M0.8 and test altitude. In that case the dcs f18 performs.

 

at 5k ft from M0.8 to M1.08 in 24.8seconds (+3.8sec).

at 20k ft from M0.8 to M1.2 in 39.2 seconds (+4.6sec)

at 35k ft from M0.8 to M1.2 in 62.2 seconds (+6.4sec).

 

2) acceleration from below tested speed thru the speed range. In that case results in dcs are as follows

 

at 5k ft from M0.8 to M1.08 in 22.5seconds (+1.5sec).

at 20k ft from M0.8 to M1.2 in 35.8 seconds (+1.2 sec)

at 35k ft from M0.8 to M1.2 in 58.5 seconds (+2.7 sec)

 

Does anybody know how those tests are done rw?

 

If those figures are right - the Hornet is underperforming between 5% and 10% which is surprisingly a large gap to published figures...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...