Project Name: A-10C II

What's an A-10C II? I think that's the first question I'm going to have when I look at the store page, the main menu, or the unit in the Mission Editor.

It just doesn't feel right for the upgrade project, as this name sounds arbitrary. If this is real nomenclature, then obviously this topic is in error.

I think there are perhaps better naming conventions than putting roman numerals after the module name. Examples:

1. Sub variants of the aircraft model (most closely matching): Examples include Block, Lot, and Mark numbers for the subject aircraft. These are already used on other projects like the Viper, Hornet, FW-190, Spitfire, Albatros, etc.. In the case of the Warthog, the obvious answer would be Suite number.

2. Project year: The Admiral Kuznetsov update can be see in the ME with the year in parenthesis behind the unit name. "CV 1143.5 Admiral Kuznetsov (2017)"

3. USAF Upgrade Program name, nickname: Examples include: Rewing, Hog-Up, Precision Engagement. I even like the fictitious "Tank Killer" title more than I like "II."

4. Usual software convention: Version 2, v2. "2.0"

Just some thoughts to reduce a little confusion. I know it's already late in the development stage, as there's already been an announcement and we're near release.

Last weekends development progress seems to have it titled as the A10c II Tank Killer...

As long as ED doesn’t call “A-10C II Tank Killer” (which is MEGA CRINGE, ED) I’m happy

As long as ED doesn’t call “A-10C II Tank Killer” (which is MEGA CRINGE, ED) I’m happy

Exactly why I made the OP. I think that's going to be the case.