Wish List: BF109 Gunpods and rockets? - Page 2 - ED Forums
 


Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-10-2018, 04:08 PM   #11
Falcoblu
Senior Member
 
Falcoblu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Aosta, Italia
Posts: 2,770
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reflected View Post
Although I would never equip mine with them, I say bring them on!
Instead I if they were available, I would gladly use them against bomber formations.

Among other things in the cockpit there is already the appropriate selector, who knows if they will ever implement them ..

Falcoblu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-10-2018, 07:43 PM   #12
Pasquale1986
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Cologne, European Union
Posts: 346
Default

Yup, and abuse them for some ground pounding
__________________
Main Modules: F/A-18C, AJS-37 Viggen

Personal Wishlist: F-117A
Pasquale1986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2018, 11:17 AM   #13
Falcoblu
Senior Member
 
Falcoblu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Aosta, Italia
Posts: 2,770
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pasquale1986 View Post
Yup, and abuse them for some ground pounding
However it is better to have them than not to have them, then everyone decides whether to use the pods with cannons or not to use them.

Among other things, they are very useful for ground attack as well as for bomber formations.
Falcoblu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2018, 11:29 AM   #14
DefaultFace
Member
 
DefaultFace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 530
Default

Yes will be very helpful for killing B-17s that lose wings to 2 50 cal bullets anyway...
__________________
9./JG27

"If you can't hit anything, it's because you suck. If you get shot down, it's because you suck. You and me, we know we suck, and that makes it ok." - Worst person in all of DCS

"In the end, which will never come, we will all be satisifed... we must fight them on forum, we will fight them on reddit..." - Dunravin
DefaultFace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2018, 12:26 PM   #15
Pasquale1986
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Cologne, European Union
Posts: 346
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falcoblu View Post
However it is better to have them than not to have them, then everyone decides whether to use the pods with cannons or not to use them.

Among other things, they are very useful for ground attack as well as for bomber formations.
Exactly

Quote:
Originally Posted by DefaultFace View Post
Yes will be very helpful for killing B-17s that lose wings to 2 50 cal bullets anyway...
More is more Anyway, i am certain that in the in the long haul the DM of the B-17G will be adjustet to realistic levels

Wags was pretty clear on their intention to continue the WWII branch
__________________
Main Modules: F/A-18C, AJS-37 Viggen

Personal Wishlist: F-117A
Pasquale1986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2018, 02:52 PM   #16
Falcoblu
Senior Member
 
Falcoblu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Aosta, Italia
Posts: 2,770
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DefaultFace View Post
Yes will be very helpful for killing B-17s that lose wings to 2 50 cal bullets anyway...
Obviously the speech is related to the new model of damage that will come out, the current one is clear that it does not correspond to the real situation.
Falcoblu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2018, 02:53 PM   #17
Falcoblu
Senior Member
 
Falcoblu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Aosta, Italia
Posts: 2,770
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pasquale1986 View Post
More is more Anyway, i am certain that in the in the long haul the DM of the B-17G will be adjustet to realistic levels

Wags was pretty clear on their intention to continue the WWII branch
Exactly
Falcoblu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2018, 10:42 AM   #18
Falcoblu
Senior Member
 
Falcoblu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Aosta, Italia
Posts: 2,770
Default

It would also be interesting if they did the version with 20mm since in reality it was usual to make changes in the factory and in the field, the so-called "UmrustBausatze" , maybe as an option...

Falcoblu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2018, 01:00 PM   #19
DefaultFace
Member
 
DefaultFace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 530
Default

I believe the conclusion was that this was not the case in the K4 or only on a test basis. In any case it wasn’t well recorded. Best you can hope for in this regard is a G10.
__________________
9./JG27

"If you can't hit anything, it's because you suck. If you get shot down, it's because you suck. You and me, we know we suck, and that makes it ok." - Worst person in all of DCS

"In the end, which will never come, we will all be satisifed... we must fight them on forum, we will fight them on reddit..." - Dunravin
DefaultFace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2018, 03:04 PM   #20
Falcoblu
Senior Member
 
Falcoblu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Aosta, Italia
Posts: 2,770
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DefaultFace View Post
I believe the conclusion was that this was not the case in the K4 or only on a test basis. In any case it wasn’t well recorded. Best you can hope for in this regard is a G10.
It is probable that it went so, obviously they did not consider the 20mm speech also valid for the K4.

Having a G6/G10 would be very interesting but I think we'll never see it ..

Falcoblu is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
#bf109, #bf109-k4, #k4, #mg151, #payloads

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:28 AM. vBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys. Powered by vBulletin®.
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.