MaRaud3r Posted June 26, 2020 Share Posted June 26, 2020 Please consider letting us put BRM 90mm on the inner pods again. Its such a nice loadout for SEAD, etc. It might not be super realistic, but at the end of the day, this is just a game :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uboats Posted June 26, 2020 Share Posted June 26, 2020 will consider checked j-10, it has rockets mounted at inner stations. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] My DCS Mods, Skins, Utilities and Scripts | Windows 10 | i7-4790K | GTX 980Ti Hybrid | 32GB RAM | 3TB SSD | | TM Warthog Stick | CH Pro Throttle + Pro Pedal | TIR5 Pro | TM MFD Cougar | Gun Camera: PrtScn | Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike_Romeo Posted June 26, 2020 Share Posted June 26, 2020 +1 With rocket on the inner pylons it would be a much better multirole figher. My skins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joca133 Posted June 26, 2020 Share Posted June 26, 2020 +2 that would be awesome! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terrorban Posted June 26, 2020 Share Posted June 26, 2020 will consider checked j-10, it has rockets mounted at inner stations. That is a good point. I hope you guys do reconsider. :) Current Hangar : A-10C II ¦ AJS-37 ¦ A/V-8B ¦ F-14A/B ¦ F/A-18C ¦ FC3 ¦ JF-17 ¦ Ka-50 ¦ Mi-8 ¦ M2000-C ¦ SA342 ¦ UH-1H Other Modules : Combined Arms ¦ Persian Gulf TRAINED - LEARNING - UNTOUCHED - ABANDONED Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paco2002 Posted June 26, 2020 Share Posted June 26, 2020 +1 With rocket on the inner pylons it would be a much better multirole figher. Yes, but it will surge the engines I would say, it should be able to use it, if you put the throttle to idle whe you shoot the rocket. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xeno426 Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 If the issue is smoke ingestion, I hope the affects can be modeled so we have to be careful in employment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mustang25 Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 If the issue is smoke ingestion, I hope the affects can be modeled so we have to be careful in employment. Engine surge was implemented in the last patch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xeno426 Posted June 27, 2020 Share Posted June 27, 2020 Engine surge was implemented in the last patch. Oh, sweet, Missed that. Haven't had a chance to fly in a couple weeks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiger-II Posted June 28, 2020 Share Posted June 28, 2020 The intake is above the smoke plume. The other consideration is local aerodynamic effects. It could be the local airflow causes the smoke to move towards the intake, exacerbating the situation. Motorola 68000 | 1 Mb | Debug port "When performing a forced landing, fly the aircraft as far into the crash as possible." - Bob Hoover. The JF-17 is not better than the F-16; it's different. It's how you fly that counts. "An average aircraft with a skilled pilot, will out-perform the superior aircraft with an average pilot." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe90 Posted June 29, 2020 Share Posted June 29, 2020 Does this also mean we can have the C701 IR and TV variants on pylons 3 & 5? And maybe dual racks on pylons 2 & 6? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terrorban Posted June 29, 2020 Share Posted June 29, 2020 Does this also mean we can have the C701 IR and TV variants on pylons 3 & 5? And maybe dual racks on pylons 2 & 6? No Current Hangar : A-10C II ¦ AJS-37 ¦ A/V-8B ¦ F-14A/B ¦ F/A-18C ¦ FC3 ¦ JF-17 ¦ Ka-50 ¦ Mi-8 ¦ M2000-C ¦ SA342 ¦ UH-1H Other Modules : Combined Arms ¦ Persian Gulf TRAINED - LEARNING - UNTOUCHED - ABANDONED Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe90 Posted June 29, 2020 Share Posted June 29, 2020 Is there good reason why we cannot have C-701 dual racks on pylons 2 & 6 and single on 3 & 5? SD-10A: Length: 3934 mm Diameter: 203 mm Wing span: 670 mm Fin span: 752 mm Weight: 199 kg Propulsion: Solid dual-thrust rocket motor with lofted profile Range: 100 km Altitude: 21 km C-701: Length: 2507 mm Diameter: 180 mm Wingspan: 587 mm(450 mm when folded) Weight: 117 kg Warhead: 29 kg (semi armor-piercing) Speed: > 0.8 Mach Cruise altitude: 15 - 20 metre Range: 25 km Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xeno426 Posted June 29, 2020 Share Posted June 29, 2020 Probably related to the launch rail, which needs to split the data appropriately to the missiles. For instance, just because an aircraft can carry the twin AIM-120 launchers doesn't mean anything about the AGM-65, because that requires the LAU-88 for multiple missiles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J20Stronk Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 (edited) Is there good reason why we cannot have C-701 dual racks on pylons 2 & 6 and single on 3 & 5? SD-10A: Length: 3934 mm Diameter: 203 mm Wing span: 670 mm Fin span: 752 mm Weight: 199 kg Propulsion: Solid dual-thrust rocket motor with lofted profile Range: 100 km Altitude: 21 km C-701: Length: 2507 mm Diameter: 180 mm Wingspan: 587 mm(450 mm when folded) Weight: 117 kg Warhead: 29 kg (semi armor-piercing) Speed: > 0.8 Mach Cruise altitude: 15 - 20 metre Range: 25 km Different launch rails. The rails for the SD-10/PL-12 are PF-12s. C-701 and PL-5 use smaller P-9W rails. The dual pylon, AFAIK only uses PF-12s. Not sure if there is a dual rail P-9W. This may also be why we can't mount SD-10, PL-5 or C-701 on the inner stations; it is unknown if the inner pylon can mount the rails on them. Edited June 30, 2020 by J20Stronk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AeriaGloria Posted June 30, 2020 Share Posted June 30, 2020 This is the first time I’ve heard someone mention the name of the rails! I was just thinking if the SD-10 dual rack actually has two of the PF-12 rails attached and that the only unique part is the V bracket And I never realized C-701 uses sidewinder rack, how interesting. Maybe I need to use it more Black Shark Den Squadron Member: We are open to new recruits, click here to check us out or apply to join! https://blacksharkden.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shrike88 Posted July 1, 2020 Share Posted July 1, 2020 +1 thanks for the consideration UBoats. Would really be a game changer on certain load outs and multi role capability Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kup Posted July 1, 2020 Share Posted July 1, 2020 +1 for BRM Jf-17, AV-8B N/A, F-16 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blinky.ben Posted July 1, 2020 Share Posted July 1, 2020 +1 here also Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exile5121 Posted July 4, 2020 Share Posted July 4, 2020 any updates? noticed that bombs were added to 3/5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrypticVillain Posted July 11, 2020 Share Posted July 11, 2020 I would also love to see brm's on the inner pylons again as well! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike_Romeo Posted July 15, 2020 Share Posted July 15, 2020 After the bombs were added to the inner pylons in the last OB update I have to ask if rockets on inner pylons are still a thing or can we stop dreaming now ? My skins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FoxTrotAlpha691 Posted July 15, 2020 Share Posted July 15, 2020 After the bombs were added to the inner pylons in the last OB update I have to ask if rockets on inner pylons are still a thing or can we stop dreaming now ? +1 on that, I noticed the bombs on inner pylons but not the rockets this time, is the dream dead @uboats? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exile5121 Posted July 17, 2020 Share Posted July 17, 2020 any news on this front? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike_Romeo Posted July 17, 2020 Share Posted July 17, 2020 negativ but there is still hope for this: My skins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts