Jump to content

[WIP] JF-17 DataLink


[PTF]Ali

Recommended Posts

F-16 has Link 16; JF-17 has Link 17 (yes, really).

 

 

JF-17 has the more advanced datalink, and can't interop with Link 16.

 

 

JF-17 is NOT seeing F-16 targets, but AWACS datalink targets.

 

 

AFAIK it's not possible at this time for the JF-17 to directly datalink with another non-JF-17 aircraft. AWACS required (E-3A or A-50, but it might work with E-2D as well - not tried).

Motorola 68000 | 1 Mb | Debug port

"When performing a forced landing, fly the aircraft as far into the crash as possible." - Bob Hoover.

The JF-17 is not better than the F-16; it's different. It's how you fly that counts.

"An average aircraft with a skilled pilot, will out-perform the superior aircraft with an average pilot."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

F-16 F-18 use Link16 while Jf-17 use Link-17, they are different systems , so they can not cooperate with each other.

 

Fow now, U can use an E-2 or E-3 as a birdge since AWACS can operate both system, it will distribute contact info into both network.

 

Note: A50 use a different DL protocol, and currently it has some problem link with jeff, so we use the SADL awacs instead for a temporary solution.

Deka Ironwork Tester Team

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SADL AWACS? Which one is that?

Motorola 68000 | 1 Mb | Debug port

"When performing a forced landing, fly the aircraft as far into the crash as possible." - Bob Hoover.

The JF-17 is not better than the F-16; it's different. It's how you fly that counts.

"An average aircraft with a skilled pilot, will out-perform the superior aircraft with an average pilot."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure I had it working with an A-50. Let me check the mission I set up!

 

EDIT2: It's not working.


Edited by Tiger-II

Motorola 68000 | 1 Mb | Debug port

"When performing a forced landing, fly the aircraft as far into the crash as possible." - Bob Hoover.

The JF-17 is not better than the F-16; it's different. It's how you fly that counts.

"An average aircraft with a skilled pilot, will out-perform the superior aircraft with an average pilot."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure I had it working with an A-50. Let me check the mission I set up!

 

EDIT2: It's not working.

 

it will not my friend they are different systems with different network even with AWACS as Hub that will include every fighter connected to AWACS not just JF-17 and F-16

 

JF-17 17-Link F-16 16-link i dont think this will happen that is why in real life all squadrons are specific with certain kind of fighters ... u can do some Tactical rules with different Fighters but with same system like F/A-18 can do AWACS Rule from high alt at the same Time F-16 flying in low Alt

 

but u can't replace F/A-18 with JF-17 in this rule ... it will do a different Job like supporting First Wall Formation in defense positions with long shots to do extra push but not Datalink support

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So just add E-3A on red side?

Motorola 68000 | 1 Mb | Debug port

"When performing a forced landing, fly the aircraft as far into the crash as possible." - Bob Hoover.

The JF-17 is not better than the F-16; it's different. It's how you fly that counts.

"An average aircraft with a skilled pilot, will out-perform the superior aircraft with an average pilot."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

F-16 has Link 16; JF-17 has Link 17 (yes, really).

 

 

JF-17 has the more advanced datalink, and can't interop with Link 16.

 

 

JF-17 is NOT seeing F-16 targets, but AWACS datalink targets.

 

 

AFAIK it's not possible at this time for the JF-17 to directly datalink with another non-JF-17 aircraft. AWACS required (E-3A or A-50, but it might work with E-2D as well - not tried).

 

Not really. Jeff can see F16 on its datalink without Awacs. Tried and tested

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it will not my friend they are different systems with different network even with AWACS as Hub that will include every fighter connected to AWACS not just JF-17 and F-16

 

JF-17 17-Link F-16 16-link i dont think this will happen that is why in real life all squadrons are specific with certain kind of fighters ... u can do some Tactical rules with different Fighters but with same system like F/A-18 can do AWACS Rule from high alt at the same Time F-16 flying in low Alt

 

but u can't replace F/A-18 with JF-17 in this rule ... it will do a different Job like supporting First Wall Formation in defense positions with long shots to do extra push but not Datalink support

 

 

Jf-17 is receiving F16 Radar contacts, There is no problem with Link 16 and link 17, Only F16 is not getting Jf-17 radar contacts. Is Jf17 datalink output is bugged or work in progress? I want to connect Jf17 and F16 without awac, It is working but F16 is not receiving my JF17 radar contacts

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

F-16 has Link 16; JF-17 has Link 17 (yes, really).

 

 

JF-17 has the more advanced datalink, and can't interop with Link 16.

 

 

JF-17 is NOT seeing F-16 targets, but AWACS datalink targets.

 

 

AFAIK it's not possible at this time for the JF-17 to directly datalink with another non-JF-17 aircraft. AWACS required (E-3A or A-50, but it might work with E-2D as well - not tried).

 

Negative, Jf-17 is receiving F16 Radar contacts without awacs, There is no problem with Link 16 and link 17, Only F16 is not getting Jf-17 radar contacts. Is Jf17 datalink output is bugged or work in progress? I want to connect Jf17 and F16 without awac, It is working but F16 is not receiving my JF17 radar contacts

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Datalink Problem

 

Hi, Recently i noticed F16 is not receving Datalink contacts from link17 Jf17 on the other hand Jf17 is receiving every radar contact from F16 without awac,

My aim is that is there anyway F16 can receive Jf17 contacts without awac even Jf17 is getting radar contacts of f16 without AWAC. Thanks

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Negative, Jf-17 is receiving F16 Radar contacts without awacs, There is no problem with Link 16 and link 17, Only F16 is not getting Jf-17 radar contacts. Is Jf17 datalink output is bugged or work in progress? I want to connect Jf17 and F16 without awac, It is working but F16 is not receiving my JF17 radar contacts

 

dont repeat the answer my friend ..... can u show my how did u perform this test ???

 

u said that JF-17 can see F-16 targets ... what did u do to confirm that ???

 

its not about Bugged or something its a different systems with different codes

 

Edit : read this

 

https://quwa.org/2016/04/05/link-17-pakistans-homegrown-data-link-system/


Edited by Chiron
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the JF-17 is equipped with Link16/MIDS, so there shouldn't be any datalinking between them at all.

Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit

 

DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!

 

Tornado3 small.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think the JF-17 is equipped with Link16/MIDS, so there shouldn't be any datalinking between them at all.[/QU

 

Negative, Jf-17 is receiving F16 Radar contacts without awacs, There is no problem with Link 16 and link 17, Only F16 is not getting Jf-17 radar contacts. Is Jf17 datalink output is bugged or work in progress? I want to connect Jf17 and F16 without awac, It is working but F16 is not receiving my JF17 radar contacts

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dont repeat the answer my friend ..... can u show my how did u perform this test ???

 

u said that JF-17 can see F-16 targets ... what did u do to confirm that ???

 

its not about Bugged or something its a different systems with different codes

 

Edit : read this

 

https://quwa.org/2016/04/05/link-17-pakistans-homegrown-data-link-system/

 

We are testing JF17 datalink in Satal Diamond match where there is no awac, We tested Jf-17 is receiving F16 Radar contacts without awacs just F16 is not receiving Jf-17 radar data. So tell me how jf17 receiving f16 data without awac but f16 is not, There is clearly problem? And before further discussion can you introduce yourself because i want to ask deka ironwork support.


Edited by AliPG

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...