Jump to content

GM1?


JuliMonkey

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...

I dont know anything about EDs plans about that but I would assume that in this time nitrous oxide was pretty expensive to produce so I dont think it was very common in battle. Especially in the late phases of war, when the Luftwaffe and its resources and possiblities were corroded more and more.

But indeed I would also like to see the advantage for the already very performant engine.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Gainward RTX 2080 OC | i7 8700K OC | 32GB G.Skill RipJaws V DDR4 3600 MHz | MSI Z370-A PRO | Samsung 970 EVO 500GB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ta-152H-1 used GM1, or high Bfs model like Bf-109G-1

Fw 190D-9 never (may be some experimental D-9 plane but do not think so)

F-15E | F-14A/B

P-51D | P-47D | Mosquito FB Mk VI |Spitfire | Fw 190D | Fw 190A | Bf 109K |  WWII Assets Pack

Normandy 2 | The Channel | Sinai | Syria | PG | NTTR | South Atlantic 

F/A-18 | F-86 | F-16C | A-10C | FC-3 | CA | SC |

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
they cant (D-9) and even if it could it would be useless below 5000-6000m compared to the mw-50

 

I dont think, that its useless below this altitude. It works the same way but the air pressure in low altitudes is already high enough to generate a good manifold pressure. Therefore an additional enhancement could not be used for long and could damage the engine easily.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Gainward RTX 2080 OC | i7 8700K OC | 32GB G.Skill RipJaws V DDR4 3600 MHz | MSI Z370-A PRO | Samsung 970 EVO 500GB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...