GumidekCZ Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 Created simple mission with M2000C (can be any a/c type) at HOT ascpect on AWACS (E-2 or E-3), alt 6000 feet. AWACS active with range from hostile around 65nm. Me monitoring SA page. At first DL contact appeard, but suddenly around 56nm, DL contact dissapeard. It took quite a time to reappear. I have absolute no clue why. I admit, that I dont know if this is AWACS bug or F/A-18C.FA-18C_SA_DL_BUG.trkF18_AWACS_DL_BUG.miz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fjacobsen Posted April 19, 2020 Share Posted April 19, 2020 I don´t know anything about AWACS radars, but I assume that they aren´t wonder radars either. They most probaly have a scan zone with blind spots depending on altitude and distance of possible contacts. I don´t think they have a full 360x360° scan sphere. i7-10700K 3.8-5.1Ghz, 32GB RAM, RTX 4070 12GB, 1 x 1 TB SSD, 2 x 2TB SSD2 TB, 1 x 2 TBHDD 7200 RPM, Win10 Home 64bit, Meta Quest 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Razor18 Posted April 20, 2020 Share Posted April 20, 2020 I guess basically they do, but as long as they are in a turn, they have some blind spots. Of course it depends whether DCS modells it properly, if at all. But there is no 360x360° scan zone... :smartass: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ED Team NineLine Posted April 20, 2020 ED Team Share Posted April 20, 2020 SO what I saw in the track was the first orbit of the E-3, when it was pointed away from the Mirage, it seems to lose contact, but on the second orbit, when the Mirage was much closer, 50nm or so, it didn't seem to lose contact pointed away. Will look into this as see if its a bug or not. Thanks. Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ED Team NineLine Posted April 20, 2020 ED Team Share Posted April 20, 2020 That was quick, so just talked to the team, most likely what we are seeing is a blind spot in that the E-3 can scan 360 on the horizontal plane, but has some limitations on the vertical plane, and because of that, in a bank, this can limit the horizontal plane scan. The E3 was quite a bit higher altitude than the mirage, so add that to the bank angle of the orbit and you can get what you see in the track. Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GumidekCZ Posted April 21, 2020 Author Share Posted April 21, 2020 That was quick, so just talked to the team, most likely what we are seeing is a blind spot in that the E-3 can scan 360 on the horizontal plane, but has some limitations on the vertical plane, and because of that, in a bank, this can limit the horizontal plane scan. The E3 was quite a bit higher altitude than the mirage, so add that to the bank angle of the orbit and you can get what you see in the track. Thank very much and to team for quick response. Can we get an info about every AWACS in game with its vertical limits? I mean the vertical angle he can scan. This IS VERY important thing if you are planning (in ME) your mission and radar coverage. This is last thing you want experience as a fighter doing advanced tactics, than suddenly loose your DL contact due to turning AWACS.:helpsmilie: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oceandar Posted April 21, 2020 Share Posted April 21, 2020 Real life AWACS could lost contact, I remember reading story of 2 F-15's vs 2 MiG-29's in Balkan Op. AWACS didnt see the MiG all the time. Mastering others is strength. Mastering yourself is true power. - Lao Tze Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GumidekCZ Posted May 17, 2020 Author Share Posted May 17, 2020 (edited) NOT [AS IT IS] Found it, wrong elevation limits values (only -15/+10 degree) in DCS Lua code, and found more things are wrong in code, like missile sensors FOV defined as full 180 degree. In real world, E-3C and E-2D have ground stabilized AESA radar in all 3 axes, so standard turn bank angle is not a limit. AESA radar have ability to set almost any elevation angle (like -70/+70 degrees). Even wings cant obscure target, because the radar array is much wider than length of wing profile. On top of that both E-2D and E-3C has an ability of detecting cruise missiles at long ranges. https://www.forecastinternational.com/archive/disp_old_pdf.cfm?ARC_ID=72 APS-138. This variant introduced the low side-lobe antenna (Total Radiation Aperture Control Antenna (TRAC-A)) first delivered in late 1982, and was designed to track cruise missiles at long distances (150 nm). Also I think, that E-2C in DCS should be equipped with AN/APS-145 radar, intstaled from year 1991. Now found, that in scripts DCS have defined E-2C with APS-138 UHF doppler radar , but in game and in Enycopedia it shows E-2D Advanced Hawkeye, equiped with AESA AN/APY-9. One small note at the end: Russia A-50 AWACS have in DCS defined vertical limits by -30 and +30 degree (vs E-2D and E-3C with only -15 and +10 degree)!!! Edited May 17, 2020 by GumidekCZ found new info Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GumidekCZ Posted May 21, 2020 Author Share Posted May 21, 2020 Hello? Is there anybody out there? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ED Team NineLine Posted May 27, 2020 ED Team Share Posted May 27, 2020 I've flagged with a dev to look at. Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hein22 Posted May 27, 2020 Share Posted May 27, 2020 NOT [AS IT IS] Found it, wrong elevation limits values (only -15/+10 degree) in DCS Lua code, and found more things are wrong in code, like missile sensors FOV defined as full 180 degree. In real world, E-3C and E-2D have ground stabilized AESA radar in all 3 axes, so standard turn bank angle is not a limit. AESA radar have ability to set almost any elevation angle (like -70/+70 degrees). Even wings cant obscure target, because the radar array is much wider than length of wing profile. On top of that both E-2D and E-3C has an ability of detecting cruise missiles at long ranges. https://www.forecastinternational.com/archive/disp_old_pdf.cfm?ARC_ID=72 APS-138. This variant introduced the low side-lobe antenna (Total Radiation Aperture Control Antenna (TRAC-A)) first delivered in late 1982, and was designed to track cruise missiles at long distances (150 nm). Also I think, that E-2C in DCS should be equipped with AN/APS-145 radar, intstaled from year 1991. Now found, that in scripts DCS have defined E-2C with APS-138 UHF doppler radar , but in game and in Enycopedia it shows E-2D Advanced Hawkeye, equiped with AESA AN/APY-9. One small note at the end: Russia A-50 AWACS have in DCS defined vertical limits by -30 and +30 degree (vs E-2D and E-3C with only -15 and +10 degree)!!! Very interesting, thanks for sharing. I have subscribed to this thread to know news from the devs. Stay safe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts