Have the Hornet devs moved back from the Viper? - ED Forums
 


Notices

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-06-2019, 06:24 PM   #1
Arctander
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 242
Default Have the Hornet devs moved back from the Viper?

As in the title we have not been told that they have, and it has been 8 weeks now (iirc) since we were told they had (edit: been moved to help with the Viper)

Have they ALL moved back?

And if not, what is the backstop ED can give us (last date at which they will be working on the Viper before being moved back irrespective of Viper status).

Last edited by Arctander; 11-06-2019 at 09:56 PM. Reason: Clarified first line
Arctander is online now  
Old 11-06-2019, 06:34 PM   #2
probad
Senior Member
 
probad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 2,146
Default

great, everyone's a manager
__________________
hahaha hey look at me i surely know more about aviation and coding than actual industry professionals hired for their competency because i have read jalopnik and wikipedia i bet theyve never even heard of google LOL
probad is offline  
Old 11-06-2019, 06:38 PM   #3
QuiGon
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Germany
Posts: 11,652
Default

Folks, how about letting the devs work as they seem fit to do what works best instead of all this remote managing from people who have no clue of the actual work?

Quote:
Originally Posted by probad View Post
great, everyone's a manager
Indeed...
__________________
Intel i7-4790K @ 4x4GHz + 16 GB DDR3 + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + Windows 10 64Bit

DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!

QuiGon is offline  
Old 11-06-2019, 06:39 PM   #4
Arctander
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 242
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by probad View Post
great, everyone's a manager
Funnily enough, yes I am. But I’m also a paying customer who is concerned that the product I paid for is not being worked on to the best of the companies ability.

As a comparison example, If had I paid money for building work, and the building work was going slowly, and my next door neighbour had building work being done that started after mine and I can see it’s the same guys, I would be asking exactly the same question, as would you. Why should ED be protected from others from answering such a straight forward and open question?

Last edited by Arctander; 11-06-2019 at 06:43 PM.
Arctander is online now  
Old 11-06-2019, 07:32 PM   #5
Hawkeye_UK
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 63
Default

I think its unfair to say about manager's - this is a forum and people can raise or voice their feelings/thoughts.

However this has been raised before in terms of concerns. I think the context to this is that people easily forget the community was told earlier this year that the F16 development would in no way affect the rollout or Early Access status of the F18. At the time i think it was fair to say a few of us rolled our eyes and thought that wouldn't be the case which has since proven to be correct.

It is also fair to say that since the end of July there has not really been any major advancements in the Hornet systems for early access and that is a full quarter. There are many outstanding issues and systems that need development, the TGP has had nothing more done and it is currently very basic with key features missing, even the HUD marker. We all know the key systems the hornet drivers are waiting on being TWS, AG radar, TGP completion etc.

The issue as i always say is ED's communication is generally very poor on milestone developments, even if they said Q3/Q4 target date for this or that system its not the time taken its the apparent lack of direction and treating paying customers like mushrooms. This was highlighted about a month ago and we got a brief statement on plans for both the hornet and the viper.

Whilst we are appreciative of this great simulation we should also remember that this is not BMS or community developed and given that it is payware ED should quite rightly have to communicate to their customers like any other commercial venture. It is also correct that they are brought to task when they go back on their promises or don't deliver a system.

Releasing the Viper has clearly annoyed some customers given the broken promise of it not impacting the Hornet. I have also noted numerous people saying that they will no longer purchase the Viper EA because its supporting ED's policy of moving on and not finishing modules, encouraging endless EA and chasing the next cash source - that said without support remember what happened to Mircoprose.....
__________________
---------------------------------------------------------------

DCS | F14B | AV8B | F18C | A10C | Viggen | SU27 | F15 | MI8 | Huey | KA50 | Persian Gulf | Nevada | Normandy

Water Cooled i7 9700K @ 5.1Ghz | RTX2080 Ultra | 32GB DDR4 3200 MHz | 500GB SSD m2 | Oculus Rift S | TM Warthog | Saitek X52 Pro | Saitek Side Panel | Steel Series Arctis 7 Heaphones
Hawkeye_UK is offline  
Old 11-06-2019, 07:36 PM   #6
Arctander
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Posts: 242
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawkeye_UK View Post
I think its unfair to say about manager's - this is a forum and people can raise or voice their feelings/thoughts.

However this has been raised before in terms of concerns. I think the context to this is that people easily forget the community was told earlier this year that the F16 development would in no way affect the rollout or Early Access status of the F18. At the time i think it was fair to say a few of us rolled our eyes and thought that wouldn't be the case which has since proven to be correct.

It is also fair to say that since the end of July there has not really been any major advancements in the Hornet systems for early access and that is a full quarter. There are many outstanding issues and systems that need development, the TGP has had nothing more done and it is currently very basic with key features missing, even the HUD marker. We all know the key systems the hornet drivers are waiting on being TWS, AG radar, TGP completion etc.

The issue as i always say is ED's communication is generally very poor on milestone developments, even if they said Q3/Q4 target date for this or that system its not the time taken its the apparent lack of direction and treating paying customers like mushrooms. This was highlighted about a month ago and we got a brief statement on plans for both the hornet and the viper.

Whilst we are appreciative of this great simulation we should also remember that this is not BMS or community developed and given that it is payware ED should quite rightly have to communicate to their customers like any other commercial venture. It is also correct that they are brought to task when they go back on their promises or don't deliver a system.

Releasing the Viper has clearly annoyed some customers given the broken promise of it not impacting the Hornet. I have also noted numerous people saying that they will no longer purchase the Viper EA because its supporting ED's policy of moving on and not finishing modules, encouraging endless EA and chasing the next cash source - that said without support remember what happened to Mircoprose.....
Thanks for a great response.
Arctander is online now  
Old 11-08-2019, 07:43 PM   #7
Akula
Member
 
Akula's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 314
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawkeye_UK View Post
I think its unfair to say about manager's - this is a forum and people can raise or voice their feelings/thoughts.

However this has been raised before in terms of concerns. I think the context to this is that people easily forget the community was told earlier this year that the F16 development would in no way affect the rollout or Early Access status of the F18. At the time i think it was fair to say a few of us rolled our eyes and thought that wouldn't be the case which has since proven to be correct.

It is also fair to say that since the end of July there has not really been any major advancements in the Hornet systems for early access and that is a full quarter. There are many outstanding issues and systems that need development, the TGP has had nothing more done and it is currently very basic with key features missing, even the HUD marker. We all know the key systems the hornet drivers are waiting on being TWS, AG radar, TGP completion etc.

The issue as i always say is ED's communication is generally very poor on milestone developments, even if they said Q3/Q4 target date for this or that system its not the time taken its the apparent lack of direction and treating paying customers like mushrooms. This was highlighted about a month ago and we got a brief statement on plans for both the hornet and the viper.

Whilst we are appreciative of this great simulation we should also remember that this is not BMS or community developed and given that it is payware ED should quite rightly have to communicate to their customers like any other commercial venture. It is also correct that they are brought to task when they go back on their promises or don't deliver a system.

Releasing the Viper has clearly annoyed some customers given the broken promise of it not impacting the Hornet. I have also noted numerous people saying that they will no longer purchase the Viper EA because its supporting ED's policy of moving on and not finishing modules, encouraging endless EA and chasing the next cash source - that said without support remember what happened to Mircoprose.....


Excellent reply and well warranted. To demonize the criticisms of paying customers is just sad.
Akula is offline  
Old 11-08-2019, 08:01 PM   #8
JAKAL
Member
 
JAKAL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: ITALY
Posts: 354
Default

I also like EA, which is why I bought all the modules under development. But as a customer, I'd like to have the updates released faster.
With the advent of the Viper, I also believed that updates on the various systems, including the Hornet, took place more quickly.
I hope for the future in the most consistent update release.
Go ahead ED!
JAKAL is offline  
Old 11-08-2019, 08:50 PM   #9
Ayabe
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Akula View Post
Excellent reply and well warranted. To demonize the criticisms of paying customers is just sad.

I'm not sure why they just don't go full on Star Citizen at this point, there are enough sycophants to make it work, release some $5000 skin jobs and people will be bending over backwards to thank them.


The deal I can't let go of is that ED has basically admitted that the the $70 or whatever each of us paid for the F-18 was never going to be enough money to complete the project and the only way for this to move forward is to keep shelling out for further projects - which also have no hope of ever being completed.



So keep feeding the monkey or you get nothing.
Ayabe is offline  
Old 11-08-2019, 12:17 PM   #10
norbot
Member
 
norbot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Germany
Posts: 735
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by probad View Post
great, everyone's a manager
Yes, even a facility manager is a manager. In Germany janitors call themselves "facility manager" lately...
__________________
A-10C, AV-8B, F-5E, F-16C, F/A-18C, Yak-52, NTTR, Persian Gulf, FW 190 A-8, FW 190 D-9, Spitfire LF Mk. IX, Normandy + WWII Assets Pack

Last edited by norbot; 11-08-2019 at 12:24 PM.
norbot is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:13 AM. vBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys. Powered by vBulletin®.
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.