Wouldn't be too hard to do a Mig-17, would it? - Page 4 - ED Forums
 


Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-09-2018, 08:23 AM   #31
PLAAF
Member
 
PLAAF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 101
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kelpie View Post
That's true but since DCS doesn't have the F-3 as an option then it'll be all on it's own. Now if DCS were to get the F-3 made for AI at least then I'm all in.

Not just F-3.
There are 2 more well know fighters are capable of taking on MiG-17 on equal terms. Dassault Mystere 4 and the Hawker Hunter. They are both designed and released at the same era.

It will be awesome if we get MiG-17PM. It has both gun and missiles as well as a radar and a RWR.
__________________

ASM for Su-27 in DCS

Last edited by PLAAF; 02-16-2018 at 04:19 AM.
PLAAF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2018, 02:44 AM   #32
tryphon77
Junior Member
 
tryphon77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: France
Posts: 45
Default

I would love to have a mig 17F. I would pay a million for it...seriously! Now my question since 2014 was why the hell did belsimtek developed the mig-15?? Yeah i know it pairs up better with the F-86 but the 17 would have been so much more interesting with a tons of interesting historic mission to realize with it...
Still a fan of the mig-15 module though ;-)
tryphon77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2018, 09:41 PM   #33
Buzzles
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Northern Europe
Posts: 2,595
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tryphon77 View Post
I would love to have a mig 17F. I would pay a million for it...seriously!
Really? Module development costs fall in your price range then! ED take on private clients you know
Buzzles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2018, 01:31 PM   #34
PLAAF
Member
 
PLAAF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 101
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tryphon77 View Post
I would love to have a mig 17F. I would pay a million for it...seriously! Now my question since 2014 was why the hell did belsimtek developed the mig-15?? Yeah i know it pairs up better with the F-86 but the 17 would have been so much more interesting with a tons of interesting historic mission to realize with it...
Still a fan of the mig-15 module though ;-)

MiG-17F is not that much of a step up from the MiG-15.
IMHO, MiG-17PF is the only way to go. It has radar, rwr, cannon and may be missiles (K-5 and K-55) as well. It will be a perfect match for future F-86L.
__________________

ASM for Su-27 in DCS

Last edited by PLAAF; 02-20-2018 at 11:08 AM.
PLAAF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2018, 09:00 PM   #35
Kev2go
Senior Member
 
Kev2go's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,218
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PLAAF View Post
Not just F-3.
There are 2 more well know fighters are capable of taking on MiG-17 on equal terms. Dassault Mystere 4 and the Hawker Hunter. They are both designed and released at the same era.

It will be awesome if we get MiG-17PM. It has both gun and missiles as well as a radar and a RWR.
Mystere 4 would be more on par Korean war era Planes. Even then statisticaly speaking its still not the best Seriously ITs climb rate is worse than a F86F sabre. and its max top speed is 8 km.h slower than it also. But even then the sabre still has the gar8 sidewinder option unlike like the Mystere. otherwise Mystere 4 will be a better fighter/bomber... sure.


Hawker Hunter mk 6 on the other hand would be. Mig17F would have to rely on maneuvaerability , but Hunter on the other hand has a better climb rate, and acceleration, but not as maneuverable.
__________________





Build:


Spoiler:


Windows 10 64 bit,

Case/Tower: Corsair Graphite 760tm ,Asus Strix Z370- E Motherboard, Intel Core i7 8700k ( Noctua NH14S cooler),Crucial Ballistix DDR4 16gb ram (2400 mhz) , (Asus strix oc edition) Nvidia Gtx 1080 8gb , Evga g2 850 watt psu, Hardrives ; WD 1TB HDD, Samsung evo 850 pro 1TB SSD, Samsung evo 850 pro 512 gb SSD

Kev2go is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2019, 06:35 PM   #36
Harley Davidson
Junior Member
 
Harley Davidson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: West coast Canada
Posts: 85
Default

Yup.... Mig -17 take my cash
Harley Davidson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2019, 04:57 PM   #37
shadepiece
Junior Member
 
shadepiece's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 92
Default

I'd buy a 17 so fast!
__________________
Fire only at close range, and only when your opponent is properly in your sights.

-Hauptmann Oswald Boelcke, Jasta 2
shadepiece is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2019, 03:12 AM   #38
upyr1
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: oklahoma
Posts: 346
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Charly_Owl View Post
I think the question should be "Would anyone fork $60 for a MiG-17 when they already have the MiG-15?" instead of "Should Belsimtek develop a MiG-17?".
I'd probably get a MiG-17 when it is on sale, which is when I normally buy things. Anyhow, the real question being asked here is how much of the code could be reused? If someone would have to start from ground up basically to write an MiG-17F module then clearly they will have to charge $60 but if they can get a good MiG-17 by just changing a few variables and updating the cockpit.
upyr1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2019, 06:09 PM   #39
Zius
Member
 
Zius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 216
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PLAAF View Post
MiG-17F is not that much of a step up from the MiG-15.
IMHO, MiG-17PF is the only way to go. It has radar, rwr, cannon and may be missiles (K-5 and K-55) as well. It will be a perfect match for future F-86L.

On the contrary. The MiG-17F improves on all the qualities of the MiG-15, making it the ultimate (?) gunfighter. The MiG-17PF on the other hand adds a very primitive radar and useless missiles.


There is now also Razbam's MiG-19 to consider. It has the radar and missiles. It's not as manoeverable as the MiG-15, but it is much faster... Looking forward to the promised MiG-19S.
__________________
Modules: Bf 109, C-101, CE-II, F-5, Gazelle, Huey, Ka-50, Mi-8, MiG-15, MiG-19, MiG-21, Albatros, Viggen, Mirage 2000, Hornet, Yak-52, FC3
Zius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2019, 06:43 PM   #40
zhukov032186
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Fort Worth, Tx
Posts: 1,878
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaktaz View Post
Mig-17 is very similar to Mig-15. It's flight model would be different, engine management would be different, and the gunsight more advanced, but would it take as long as a typical module to do? Belsimtek seems to release modules at a good consistent pace, and I would love to see the early jets expanded into a more relevant era.
''It's very similar''
*proceeds to list key differences amounting to everything*

What do you think is different between any two aircraft besides the flight model, engine, and systems? That's like... the main things that take years to do
__________________
Zhukov attacks *FORUM USER* with Legendary Trollsword!
*FORUM USER* Constitution save roll.... Fail!
*FORUM USER* afflicted with ''Hurt Feelz'', -1 Concentration for two rounds
zhukov032186 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:34 AM. vBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys. Powered by vBulletin®.
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.