Xilon_x Posted October 31, 2018 Share Posted October 31, 2018 Make sure to add it to the game this time :thumbup: (but not that one) honestly I prefer "FireFox" and more characteristic then clint eastwood and a myth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaz56 Posted October 31, 2018 Share Posted October 31, 2018 search google for VSN_UFO for a flyable ufo mod, fly's ok but landings are fun/different. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eight Ball Posted October 31, 2018 Author Share Posted October 31, 2018 thanks but as I said in my first post Yes, I know, there's an UFO mod available. What better way to shatter the element of surprise than to have "required mod: VSN UFO" when sharing a mission... And yes, I know what the S in DCS stands for. Find The Links To All My Mods And Liveries Here (in the gallery) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xilon_x Posted October 31, 2018 Share Posted October 31, 2018 (edited) Edited October 31, 2018 by Xilon_x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David OC Posted November 1, 2018 Share Posted November 1, 2018 REAL is REAL LIFE not FAKE not FALSE but TRUE STORY OF LIFE REAL in italian lenguagge "name subject"-- REALE . i7-7700K OC @ 5Ghz | ASUS IX Hero MB | ASUS GTX 1080 Ti STRIX | 32GB Corsair 3000Mhz | Corsair H100i V2 Radiator | Samsung 960 EVO M.2 NVMe 500G SSD | Samsung 850 EVO 500G SSD | Corsair HX850i Platinum 850W | Oculus Rift | ASUS PG278Q 27-inch, 2560 x 1440, G-SYNC, 144Hz, 1ms | VKB Gunfighter Pro Chuck's DCS Tutorial Library Download PDF Tutorial guides to help get up to speed with aircraft quickly and also great for taking a good look at the aircraft available for DCS before purchasing. Link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xilon_x Posted November 1, 2018 Share Posted November 1, 2018 (edited) Physics Analysis Of TR-3B From FoucheMedia FoucheMedia@satx.rr.com 11-9-00 Thought you might be interested in an article posted by John Kooiman about the TR-3B gravity warping technology. I will depend on my esteemed friends and colleges who actually understand physics to rebut or support his premise. Love to hear your thoughts. After the revelation about the USAF's saucer programs in the last few months, things are getting more interesting. Especially as I stated 3 years ago that we had researched, reverse engineered, and built many saucer type prototypes since the 50s.Many readers of this list are probably already familiar with Edgar Fouche's description of the USA's Top Secret TR-3B triangular shaped nuclear powered aerospace craft. If not, read about it here: http://fouchemedia.com/arap/speech.htm Mr. Fouche describes the TR-3B's propulsion system as follows: "A circular, plasma filled accelerator ring called the Magnetic Field Disrupter, surrounds the rotatable crew compartment and is far ahead of any imaginable technology... The plasma, mercury based, is pressurized at 250,000 atmospheres at a temperature of 150 degrees Kelvin, and accelerated to 50,000 rpm to create a super-conductive plasma with the resulting gravity disruption. The MFD generates a magnetic vortex field, which disrupts or neutralizes the effects of gravity on mass within proximity, by 89 percent... The current MFD in the TR-3B causes the effect of making the vehicle extremely light, and able to outperform and outmaneuver any craft yet ...My sources say the performance is limited only the stresses that the human pilots can endure. Which is a lot, really, considering along with the 89% reduction in mass, the G forces are also reduced by 89%. The crew of the TR-3B should be able to comfortable take up to 40Gs... Reduced by 89%, the occupants would feel about 4.2 Gs. The TR-3Bs propulsion is provided by 3 multimode thrusters mounted at each bottom corner of the triangular platform. The TR-3 is a sub-Mach 9 vehicle until it reaches altitudes above l20,000 feet - then who knows how fast it can go!..." I was skeptical of Mr. Fouche's claims when I first read them, as I'm sure that many of you are, but I was interested enough to do further research on what happens when you spin a plasma at high speeds in a ring (toroidal) configuration. I came across a physics article (sorry, I can't seem to locate the source right now) that described this exact configuration. The article said that, surprisingly, the charged particles of the plasma don't just spin uniformly around the ring, but they tend to take up a synchronized, tightly pitched, helical (screw thread) motion as they move around the ring. This can be understood in a general way as follows: the charged particles moving around the ring act as a current that in turn sets up a magnetic field around the ring. It is a well-known fact that electrons (or ions) tend to move in a helical fashion around magnetic field lines. Although it is a highly complex interaction, it only requires a small leap of faith to believe that the end result of these interactions between the moving charged particles (current) and associated magnetic fields results in the helical motion described above. In other words, the charged particles end up moving in very much the same pattern as the current on a wire tightly wound around a toroidal core. I thought that this was an interesting fact, but didn't see how it could possibly relate to antigravity, until I ran across the following article: "Guidelines to Antigravity" by Dr. Robert Forward, written in 1962 (available at: http://www.whidbey.com/forward/pdf/tp007.pdf). Dr. Forward's article describes several little known aspects of Einstein's General Relativity Theory that indicate how moving matter can create unusual gravitational effects. When I saw Figure 5 in Dr. Forward's article, the pieces of the puzzle all fell together. I instantly saw how the moving matter pattern that Dr. Forward describes as necessary to generate a gravitational dipole was exactly the same as the plasma ring pattern described in the physics article discussed above! If Fouche's description is even close to correct, then the TR-3B utilizes this little known loophole in General Relativity Theory to create it's antigravity effects! Even though the TR-3B can only supposedly cancel 89% of gravity (and inertia) today, there is no reason why the technology can't be improved to exceed 100% and achieve true antigravity capability! In theory, this same moving matter pattern could be mechanically reproduced by mounting a bunch of small gyroscopes all around the larger ring, with their axis on the larger ring, and then spinning both the gyroscopes and the ring at high speeds. However, as Dr. Forward points out any such mechanical system would probably fly apart before any significant antigravity effects could be generated. However, as Dr. Forward states, "By using electromagnetic forces to contain rotating systems, it would be possible for the masses to reach relativistic velocities; thus a comparatively small amount of matter, if dense enough and moving fast enough, could produce usable gravitational effects." The requirement for a dense material moving at relativistic speeds would explain the use of Mercury plasma (heavy ions). If the plasma really spins at 50,000 RPM and the Mercury ions are also moving in a tight pitched spiral, then the individual ions would be moving probably hundreds, perhaps thousands of times faster than the bulk plasma spin, in order to execute their "screw thread" motions. It is quite conceivable that the ions could be accelerated to relativistic speeds in this manner. I am guessing that you would probably want to strip the free electrons from the plasma, making a positively charged plasma, since the free electrons would tend to counter rotate and reduce the efficiency of the antigravity device. One of Einstein's postulates of GR says that gravitational mass and inertial mass are equivalent. This is consistent with Mr. Fouche's claim that inertial mass within the plasma ring is also reduced by 89%. This would also explain why the vehicle is triangular shaped. Since it still requires conventional thrusters for propulsion, the thrusters would need to be located outside of the "mass reduction zone" or else the mass of the thruster's reaction material would also be reduced, making them terribly inefficient. Since it requires a minimum of 3 legs to have a stable stool, it follows that they would need a minimum of 3 thrusters to have a stable aerospace platform. Three thrusters, located outside of the plasma ring, plus appropriate structural support, would naturally lead to a triangular shape for the vehicle. I was extremely skeptical of Mr. Fouche's claimed size for the TR-3B, of 600 feet across. At first, I thought that this must be a typo. Why would anyone in their right mind build a "Tactical Reconnaissance" vehicle 2 football fields long? They must be nuts! However, the answer to this may also be found in Dr. Forward's paper. As Dr. Forward's puts it, "...even the most optimistic calculations indicate that very large devices will be required to create usable gravitational forces. Antigravity...like all modern sciences, will require special projects involving large sums of money, men, and energy." FYI: This article has been posted to KeelyNet. You have permission to post it on your Web site, as long as proper creditation is provided. Edited November 1, 2018 by Xilon_x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mustang Posted November 1, 2018 Share Posted November 1, 2018 Wow feels like I've stumbled into a GLP thread lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eight Ball Posted November 1, 2018 Author Share Posted November 1, 2018 Xilon X, please, if you want to discuss UFO, create a thread in the chit chat, This is about DCS world, not real world. Find The Links To All My Mods And Liveries Here (in the gallery) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xilon_x Posted November 1, 2018 Share Posted November 1, 2018 (edited) ok i open new post TR-3B JOLLY veicle in DCS code name BLACK MANTA Edited November 1, 2018 by Xilon_x Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MiG21bisFishbedL Posted November 1, 2018 Share Posted November 1, 2018 Reformers hate him! This one weird trick found by a bush pilot will make gunfighter obsessed old farts angry at your multi-role carrier deck line up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tippis Posted November 1, 2018 Share Posted November 1, 2018 It's called the MiG-21. It is a flying object, after all, but its principles of flight are as yet unidentified. So it's close enough. ❧ ❧ Inside you are two wolves. One cannot land; the other shoots friendlies. You are a Goon. ❧ ❧ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MiG21bisFishbedL Posted November 1, 2018 Share Posted November 1, 2018 It's called the MiG-21. It is a flying object, after all, but its principles of flight are as yet unidentified. So it's close enough. Darts are an identified object, though. Reformers hate him! This one weird trick found by a bush pilot will make gunfighter obsessed old farts angry at your multi-role carrier deck line up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xilon_x Posted November 1, 2018 Share Posted November 1, 2018 U.F.O. Unidentified Flying Object but but exist also.... U.S.O. Unidentified Submerged Objects Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coxy_99 Posted November 1, 2018 Share Posted November 1, 2018 I thought server warping was ufo's already in dcs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jester986 Posted November 1, 2018 Share Posted November 1, 2018 Wrote a long physics explanation as to why this is all garbage out of boredom. Deleted it all because it would be the same as arguing with a flat earther. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts