asla36 Posted February 12, 2018 Share Posted February 12, 2018 Interesting. Can anyone explain the "second HUD" (in front) without a reflector glass? DCS: MiG-23 [sIGPIC] [/sIGPIC] Make it happen, and take my money! :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxbat155 Posted February 12, 2018 Share Posted February 12, 2018 (edited) This is synchronization unit between radar and ASP-5. This colimator displays target silhouette according radar signals and together with ASP-5 grid allow gun fire at the not visible target at distance up to 2000 m. Edited February 12, 2018 by foxbat155 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OverStratos Posted February 12, 2018 Author Share Posted February 12, 2018 (edited) This is synchronization unit between radar and ASP-5. This colimator displays target silhouette according radar signals and together with ASP-5 grid allow gun fire at the not visible target at distance up to 2000 m. In fact, the sight starts to display target lead information at about 1200mts because the cannons are acurrate up to 1500mts. without a reflector glass? The reflector glasses have been omitted in the pictures, but both sights have them. Edited February 12, 2018 by OverStratos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Akatsuki Posted February 12, 2018 Share Posted February 12, 2018 (edited) From Razbam FB page: I'm hyped now! Edited February 12, 2018 by Akatsuki Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OverStratos Posted February 12, 2018 Author Share Posted February 12, 2018 Who asked for updates? :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jester986 Posted February 12, 2018 Share Posted February 12, 2018 Who asked for updates? :D Always appreciated! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAD-MM Posted February 12, 2018 Share Posted February 12, 2018 Nice one...looking forward.. Once you have tasted Flight, you will forever walk the Earth with your Eyes turned Skyward. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] 9./JG27 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tryphon77 Posted February 13, 2018 Share Posted February 13, 2018 What a beautiful bird...You are making an amazing work Guys!! Keep it up :-) One quick picky question for Overstratos : Are you going to smooth out the lines of the rear canopy bow ? looks a little bit angular shaped. Sorry to bother you with that. It is just that i am a HUGE fan of mig 17 and 19 ;-) best regards, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asla36 Posted February 13, 2018 Share Posted February 13, 2018 In fact, the sight starts to display target lead information at about 1200mts because the cannons are acurrate up to 1500mts. The reflector glasses have been omitted in the pictures, but both sights have them. Ok, TY! That clears it up, and makes the aircraft even more interesting. A 2 layer HUD is an awesomely clunky prospect, and I love it! DCS: MiG-23 [sIGPIC] [/sIGPIC] Make it happen, and take my money! :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Volator Posted February 13, 2018 Share Posted February 13, 2018 As it was said before, the MiG-19P that´s going to be made is a late series MiG-19P with RP-5 Radar and R-3S AA missile integration. Because of the strong similarities between the P and PM variants, it would require a lot less effort to make also a MiG-19PM than a MiG-19S, so we may go for a MiG-19PM after the MiG-19P, I re-read the initial post and happily noticed that there is a chance for a -PM after the -P, which would be great from my point of view. One would have to figure out though how to fight in a multiplayer environment with no guns and only four rather sluggish AA-1/RS-2/K-5 ;) 1./JG71 "Richthofen" - Seven Eleven Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
probad Posted February 13, 2018 Share Posted February 13, 2018 radar target relative altitude symbology in the screencap is reversed from what we see in the mig-21, is that correct or a mislabel? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OverStratos Posted February 13, 2018 Author Share Posted February 13, 2018 Yeah, I think I put those wrong. That´s what happen when you´re doing one thing thinking in another.:D Thanks probad radar target relative altitude symbology in the screencap is reversed from what we see in the mig-21, is that correct or a mislabel? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brigg Posted February 13, 2018 Share Posted February 13, 2018 From Razbam FB page: I'm hyped now! hell yeah baby Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joker69 Posted February 13, 2018 Share Posted February 13, 2018 Simply amazing... I'll buy this module as the others. :thumbup: The metal parts are incredible.. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/ https://www.facebook.com/groups/139168989452694/about/ ASUS ROG - TM Hotas Warthog - TM Hotas Cougar - TM F-18 Grip - Oculus Rift S - Track IR 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
javelina1 Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 Gawd! incredible work! MSI MAG Z790 Carbon, i9-13900k, NH-D15 cooler, 64 GB CL40 6000mhz RAM, MSI RTX4090, Yamaha 5.1 A/V Receiver, 4x 2TB Samsung 980 Pro NVMe, 1x 2TB Samsung 870 EVO SSD, Win 11 Pro, TM Warthog, Virpil WarBRD, MFG Crosswinds, 43" Samsung 4K TV, 21.5 Acer VT touchscreen, TrackIR, Varjo Aero, Wheel Stand Pro Super Warthog, Phanteks Enthoo Pro2 Full Tower Case, Seasonic GX-1200 ATX3 PSU, PointCTRL, Buttkicker 2, K-51 Helicopter Collective Control Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarabostes Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 Till now i bought Mirage2000 and Av8B from Razbam...nice work guys...if u do a Romanian air force skin for Mig 19 (Romania had 10 Mig19 PM and 17 Mig19 P) I will buy this module from day one....if u dont...I will buy the next day :)) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Akatsuki Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 From Razbam FB page. Seem to be all the clickable area : Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dirty Rotten Flieger Posted February 20, 2018 Share Posted February 20, 2018 Really excited about this jet. I love 2nd and 3rd gen stuff. I'm still upset about Razbam Mig 23 getting cancelled. Strange to see that the radar symbology for target above and target below is opposite to the Mig 21bis. Am I mistaken? I thought the Mig 21 has a "-" with a tail pointing up if the target is above and tail pointing down if target is below... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
firmek Posted February 20, 2018 Share Posted February 20, 2018 From Razbam FB page. Seem to be all the clickable area : Look great though I really hope RAZBAM makes a proper bindings for all that 2 and 3 position switches ;) F/A-18, F-16, F-14, M-2000C, A-10C, AV-8B, AJS-37 Viggen, F-5E-3, F-86F, MiG-21bis, MiG-15bis, L-39 Albatros, C-101 Aviojet, P-51D, Spitfire LF Mk. IX, Bf 109 4-K, UH-1H, Mi-8, Ka-50, NTTR, Normandy, Persian Gulf... and not enough time to fully enjoy it all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
probad Posted February 20, 2018 Share Posted February 20, 2018 Strange to see that the radar symbology for target above and target below is opposite to the Mig 21bis. acknowledged in an earlier post Yeah, I think I put those wrong. That´s what happen when you´re doing one thing thinking in another. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Martin- Posted March 1, 2018 Share Posted March 1, 2018 Dear Overstratos, I was wondering if you could together with your promising Mig-19p release an AI RB-47 reconnaissance plane derived from the B-47 bomber. A plane on its own in DCS is not as enjoyable, as experience showed us. Although it will be great to fly your Mig-19p against say F-5s, and if you take inspiration from how Mig-15 and L-39 are modeled (cockpit, flight and damage models) many would fall in love with your plane anyway, having an actual target to intercept in this interceptor would be needed to convince many others to get it, and more importantly, to stay with it. I would imagine that a release trailer where a Mig-19p is intercepting an RB-47 as its tail gun is shooting back would get a lot of attention. If you think that it is not your responsibility and the ED's job, given how far the time span they cover is stretched, I would argue that 3D party developers should start supplementing their planes with additional AI assets. We still have no bomber to intercept in our Mig-15. Finally, the RB-47 reconnaissance plane is absolutely the most realistic target for interception, having flown reconnaissance missions around the Soviet Union from 1952 to 1965; in fact, one being shot down by a very Mig-19. Thank you for considering this suggestion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
firmek Posted March 1, 2018 Share Posted March 1, 2018 Dear Overstratos, :thumbup: I was wondering if you could together with your promising Mig-19p release an AI RB-47 reconnaissance plane derived from the B-47 bomber. A plane on its own in DCS is not as enjoyable, as experience showed us. Although it will be great to fly your Mig-19p against say F-5s, and if you take inspiration from how Mig-15 and L-39 are modeled (cockpit, flight and damage models) many would fall in love with your plane anyway, having an actual target to intercept in this interceptor would be needed to convince many others to get it, and more importantly, to stay with it. I would imagine that a release trailer where a Mig-19p is intercepting an RB-47 as its tail gun is shooting back would get a lot of attention. If you think that it is not your responsibility and the ED's job, given how far the time span they cover is stretched, I would argue that 3D party developers should start supplementing their planes with additional AI assets. We still have no bomber to intercept in our Mig-15. Finally, the RB-47 reconnaissance plane is absolutely the most realistic target for interception, having flown reconnaissance missions around the Soviet Union from 1952 to 1965; in fact, one being shot down by a very Mig-19. Thank you for considering this suggestion. :thumbup: I'm not sure if RB-47 should be a top on priority list for AI modules but I couldn't agree more with your comment. It's hard to over stress it - DCS critically needs ground, air and finally naval AI units from 50's and 60's. There is almost no content for MiG-15 and Sabre. Those from mission creators that didn't gave up and are doing everything possible to create some interesting play-ground for those planes are forced to solutions as using C-130 to portray the B-29... I really hope the situation improves and some of AI units are already worked on in parallel to MiG-19. Otherwise we get yet another module with no proper environment to fly it in. Actually, the ultimate goal should be for DCS to create an immersive air warfare environment simulation - aside of just providing great air frames representation (modules). F/A-18, F-16, F-14, M-2000C, A-10C, AV-8B, AJS-37 Viggen, F-5E-3, F-86F, MiG-21bis, MiG-15bis, L-39 Albatros, C-101 Aviojet, P-51D, Spitfire LF Mk. IX, Bf 109 4-K, UH-1H, Mi-8, Ka-50, NTTR, Normandy, Persian Gulf... and not enough time to fully enjoy it all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D4n Posted March 2, 2018 Share Posted March 2, 2018 Wow looks nice! :D Was the MiG-19 the first russian radar aircraft? xD DCS Wishlist: 2K11 Krug SA-4 Ganef SAM, VR-TrackIR icons next to player names in score-chart PvP: 100+ manual player-kills with Stingers on a well known dynamic campaign server - 100+ VTOL FARP landings & 125+ hours AV-8B, F-14 crew, royal dutch airforce F-16C - PvP campaigns since 2013 DCS server-admins: please adhere to a common sense gaming industry policy as most server admins throughout the industry do. (After all there's enough hostility on the internet already which really doesn't help anyone. Thanks.) Dell Visor VR headset, Ryzen 5 5600 (6C/12T), RTX 2060 - basic DCS-community rule-of-thumb: Don't believe bad things that a PvP pilot claims about another PvP pilot without having analyzed the existing evidence Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxbat155 Posted March 2, 2018 Share Posted March 2, 2018 (edited) No, first Soviet aircraft in service with radar ( no experimental aircraft ) was Yak-25 with temporary RP-1 radar installation ( official service start date 08.09.1953 ), later from 1955 this aircraft got intended for her new RP-6. Few months after Yak in late 1954 MiG-17P ( based on original MiG-17 construction and RP-1 Izumrud radar ) show up, changed from december 1955 by MiG-17PF ( based on MiG-17F construction ) with the same radar on the beginning, later with deeply modernized RP-1 called RP-5 ( this radar we will have in Razbam's MiG-19 ). Edited March 2, 2018 by foxbat155 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D4n Posted March 2, 2018 Share Posted March 2, 2018 So the MiG-17 was the first mass-produced radar-aircraft? Or was it Yak-25 with RP-6 ? DCS Wishlist: 2K11 Krug SA-4 Ganef SAM, VR-TrackIR icons next to player names in score-chart PvP: 100+ manual player-kills with Stingers on a well known dynamic campaign server - 100+ VTOL FARP landings & 125+ hours AV-8B, F-14 crew, royal dutch airforce F-16C - PvP campaigns since 2013 DCS server-admins: please adhere to a common sense gaming industry policy as most server admins throughout the industry do. (After all there's enough hostility on the internet already which really doesn't help anyone. Thanks.) Dell Visor VR headset, Ryzen 5 5600 (6C/12T), RTX 2060 - basic DCS-community rule-of-thumb: Don't believe bad things that a PvP pilot claims about another PvP pilot without having analyzed the existing evidence Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts