onib89 Posted April 16, 2019 Share Posted April 16, 2019 -GBU-54 Laser JDAM's -Cockpit and external graphics -Nose illum fix -TGP slew shaking fix Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LooseSeal Posted April 17, 2019 Share Posted April 17, 2019 Ooh.. is this for Santa!? (Sorry, couldn't resist) But really... we all want these things. The graphics are being done, but it takes time... - i7-7700k - 32GB DDR4 2400Mhz - GTX 1080 8GB - Installed on SSD - TM Warthog DCS Modules - A-10C; M-2000C; AV8B; F/A-18C; Ka-50; FC-3; UH-1H; F-5E; Mi-8; F-14; Persian Gulf; NTTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nessuno0505 Posted April 17, 2019 Share Posted April 17, 2019 AFAIK all is in progress, except laser JDAM that are not expected to be added because a-10c is feature complete Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hammerfly Posted April 17, 2019 Share Posted April 17, 2019 Ooh.. is this for Santa!? (Sorry, couldn't resist) But really... we all want these things. The graphics are being done, but it takes time... Why yes, yes it is for Santa. I've been wanting a new office. (Sorry, I, too, couldn't resist. Santa is my part time gig.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ac5 Posted April 17, 2019 Share Posted April 17, 2019 All very nice but don't forget also the busted sound since 2.5.4 stable.... https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=230832 Mainboard: ASUS Maximus X Hero Intel Z 370 CPU: Intel Core i7-8086K @ 4.0 GHz Memory: 32GB Corsair Dominator Platinum DDR4-3000 Graphics Card: ASUS NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 10GB Monitor ASUS PA 329 32" @ 4K 1 SSD Samsung 860 PRO 256 GB 1 SSD Samsung 860 PRO 4 TB Windows 10 - 64 V. 2004 CH Pro combatstick, throttle and pedals Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EasyEB Posted April 17, 2019 Share Posted April 17, 2019 AFAIK all is in progress, except laser JDAM that are not expected to be added because a-10c is feature complete We did get the GBU-31V3 not that long ago... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silver_Dragon Posted April 17, 2019 Share Posted April 17, 2019 Remember A-10C has only Baseline 3 suite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoopy Posted April 17, 2019 Share Posted April 17, 2019 We did get the GBU-31V3 not that long ago... Which we shouldn’t have with the suite we have in DCS World. Remember A-10C has only Baseline 3 suite. With some suite 5 isms as well v303d Fighter Group Discord | Virtual 303d Fighter Group Website | v303rd Fighter Group Twitter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
falconbr Posted April 17, 2019 Share Posted April 17, 2019 - Correct maverick "keyhole" implementation, - Correct maverick pointing cross behavior. Best regards, falconbr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs76 Posted June 12, 2019 Share Posted June 12, 2019 I'd love to have better TAD symbology/functionality. I would even pay loads of money for a more modern A-10 with the HMIT. It could be a separate module for what I care. However, I suppose we won't have any of this within the next decade unless there is public material available which the developers could actually use. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arink429 Posted June 12, 2019 Share Posted June 12, 2019 For me: Important wishes: -Chocks Other minor wishes: -External air for starting -Enhanced pilod movement (as F-14 does) -Ability for hyd pump engagement on ground (for ground checks) -Raindrops. ASUS ROG MAXIMUS X HERO WiFi AC / i7-8700K@5.0 GHz / 2xM.2 Toshiba OCZ RD400 1Tb / 4xCorsair 8Gb (32Gb) DDR4@3000 MHz / 2xGeforce GTX 1080 Ti + 1Geforce GTX 680 / SoundBlaster Fatal1ty / Windows 10 Home x64 / TM Warthog / TM TPR Pedals / Oculus Rift / Samsung UE32EH5000W Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuzzU Posted June 12, 2019 Share Posted June 12, 2019 If the A-10C isn't complete after all these years. What chance does the Hornet have for being complete? Buzz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoopy Posted June 12, 2019 Share Posted June 12, 2019 (edited) I'd love to have better TAD symbology/functionality. I would even pay loads of money for a more modern A-10 with the HMCS. It could be a separate module for what I care. However, I suppose we won't have any of this within the next decade unless there is public material available which the developers could actually use. fixed this for you. I would leave a suite 7 plus with HMCS and it include all the symbology that can appear on the TAD and HMCS. I’ve got a handful of other things that are wrong on the current version I’d like to see fixed but the A-10C, at least appears to be anyways, ED’s lowest priority module. For me: Important wishes: -Chocks - agree Other minor wishes: -External air for starting - why we NEVER use external air to start up -Enhanced pilod movement (as F-14 does) - good luck, none of EDs modules have head movement like the 14 -Ability for hyd pump engagement on ground (for ground checks) - ground checks with pilots is never done with APG hydraulic power or hydraulic test stands. Only with engines running prior to lunch -Raindrops. - should be part of the updated cockpit and external model. Edited June 12, 2019 by Snoopy v303d Fighter Group Discord | Virtual 303d Fighter Group Website | v303rd Fighter Group Twitter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gruw Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 Editable layout in order to draw killboxes and roz and others, and threat circles on the TAD would not be bad at all! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs76 Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 Editable layout in order to draw killboxes and roz and others, and threat circles on the TAD would not be bad at all! Creating areas like killboxes in the TAD is already possible by creating waypoints for the corners and adding them to a flight plan. You just need to add one WP as first and last to get a nice closed shape. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoopy Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 (edited) Creating areas like killboxes in the TAD is already possible by creating waypoints for the corners and adding them to a flight plan. You just need to add one WP as first and last to get a nice closed shape. Yes but that’s not how it’s done real world. Edited June 14, 2019 by Snoopy v303d Fighter Group Discord | Virtual 303d Fighter Group Website | v303rd Fighter Group Twitter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KamiraHusky Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 I too would pay ££'s for an updated suite, heck even a new module, the 'hog was my first and is still my most loved module, even with the F18 and F14 in my virtual hanger. Something about loading up a heavy, slow, beast of a plane to deliver tactical strikes where they're needed while still relying on the rest of your forces to provide air cover on your way in and out instead of being some multi-role, do it all yourself supersonic dart, it just feels a bit more authentic and I can enjoy the atmosphere more in our slow old beast. Brrrrt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuzzU Posted June 13, 2019 Share Posted June 13, 2019 I think I would too. A graphics update and all bugs fixed along with any missing systems. Not a full module price but something for those who already own it and then raise the basic price for those new to buying it. Maybe a new campaign too. The old girl deserves it. Buzz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Puma Posted June 14, 2019 Share Posted June 14, 2019 A-10C suite 7 as a module is a great idea. Ive always struggled understandying why ED would upgrade if they cant monetize it. But once f-18 and f-16 are settling down theyll have all the core code close so an A-10 addon is at least business-wise conceivable. Custom Pit 476 Recruiting i9-12900KF, 32 GB DDR5, Gigabyte Aorus Z690 Master, Gigabyte RTX 2080 Ti, 1TB Sabrent Roket 4+ 2x750GB RAID-0, TrackIR 5 /w clip, CRG9 49” Curved Ultrawide Flight Display+15" Touchscreen+17" Gauges display, Thrustmaster Warthog+7.5cm, Saitek Pro Combat Pedals, Streamdeck, Butt Kicker and pneumatic G-Seat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emmy Posted June 14, 2019 Share Posted June 14, 2019 Everything I’ve read from ED says that their development contract under which they created the ANG trainer and from which we got the module, prohibits upgrades beyond what we now have. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] http://www.476vfightergroup.com/content.php High Quality Aviation Photography For Personal Enjoyment And Editorial Use. www.crosswindimages.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
QuiGon Posted June 14, 2019 Share Posted June 14, 2019 Everything I’ve read from ED says that their development contract under which they created the ANG trainer and from which we got the module, prohibits upgrades beyond what we now have. They would need to negotiate a new contract which isn't being done as easy as it might sound. I haven't seen any indication that ED is inclined to invest resources into that. Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoopy Posted June 14, 2019 Share Posted June 14, 2019 A-10C suite 7 as a module is a great idea. Ive always struggled understandying why ED would upgrade if they cant monetize it. But once f-18 and f-16 are settling down theyll have all the core code close so an A-10 addon is at least business-wise conceivable. If we got an update suite 7 plus as a minimum otherwise we wouldn’t get HMCS. v303d Fighter Group Discord | Virtual 303d Fighter Group Website | v303rd Fighter Group Twitter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KamiraHusky Posted June 14, 2019 Share Posted June 14, 2019 As much as a new contract might be needed for ED to develop an updated module due to the previous one, would the same stipulation exist for a third party to come in and create a newer version? Would ED even allow it as a newer suite would potentially devalue a first party product? I'd love to have a proper discussion launched with ED on this topic, maybe once current priorities are addressed. As it stands, the limitations of our ugly old hawg make it a less and less attractive purchase compared to the F18, that once it has it's TGP will be able to do almost everything the 'hog can do, but faster and arguably better (minus the gun and overall stores capacity). Brrrrt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcs76 Posted June 14, 2019 Share Posted June 14, 2019 As long as the F-18 fills the same pockets as would have a purchase of the A-10, the receiving end would be fine with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoopy Posted June 14, 2019 Share Posted June 14, 2019 As much as a new contract might be needed for ED to develop an updated module due to the previous one, would the same stipulation exist for a third party to come in and create a newer version? Would ED even allow it as a newer suite would potentially devalue a first party product? I'd love to have a proper discussion launched with ED on this topic, maybe once current priorities are addressed. As it stands, the limitations of our ugly old hawg make it a less and less attractive purchase compared to the F18, that once it has it's TGP will be able to do almost everything the 'hog can do, but faster and arguably better (minus the gun and overall stores capacity). I highly doubt ED would allow a 3rd party to create a later suite A-10C because it would directly cut into any sales of the current module. We won’t get into the argument on what does what better all I’ll say is in the two or three times the Hornet will have to go hit the tanker the A-10C will still be engaging targets and hasn’t gone to the tanker once yet. v303d Fighter Group Discord | Virtual 303d Fighter Group Website | v303rd Fighter Group Twitter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts