Jump to content

Any model in particular you may be interested?


joanvalley

Recommended Posts

Cargos planes: C-130, C-17, C-5

5e Escadre Virtuelle du Canada / 5 Virtual Wing of Canada

Intel i9-9900KF - 8 Cores/16 Threads - 3,6/5,0GHZ / 48GB RAM / Crucial P3 Plus 2TB 3D NAND NVMe M.2 SSD / Crucial P5 1TB 3D NAND NVMe Internal SSD / WD Gold 2TB Enterprise Class HDD / NVIDIA RTX 3090 / HP Reverb G2 / HOTAS Warthog / F/A-18C Hornet HOTAS ADD-ON Grip / WINWING Super Taurus Throttle / Saitek PRO Flight Combat Rudder Pedals / Win 10 Pro

Modules owned: P-51D, F-86F, A-10C, M-2000C, F-5E, F-15C, F/A-18C, F-16C

Maps: NTTR, Persian Gulf, Syria.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

C-130 Spectre with Multi player manned positions

 

Cooler Master HAF XB EVO , ASUS P8Z77-V, i7-3770K @ 4.6GHz, Noctua AC, 32GB Corsair Vengeance Pro, EVGA 1080TI 11GB, 2 Samsung 840 Pro 540GB SSDs Raid 0, 1TB HDD, EVGA SuperNOVA 1300W PS, G930 Wireless SS Headset, TrackIR5/Wireless Proclip, TM Warthog, Saitek Pro Combat Pedals, 75" Samsung 4K QLED, HP Reverb G2, Win 10

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tornado

Su-24

A6

Ryzen9 5800X3D, Gigabyte Aorus X570 Elite, 32Gb Gskill Trident DDR4 3600 CL16, Samsung 990 Pr0 1Tb Nvme Gen4, Evo860 1Tb 2.5 SSD and Team 1Tb 2.5 SSD, MSI Suprim X RTX4090 , Corsair h115i Platinum AIO, NZXT H710i case, Seasonic Focus 850W psu, Gigabyte Aorus AD27QHD Gsync 1ms IPS 2k monitor 144Mhz, Track ir4, VKB Gunfighter Ultimate w/extension, Virpil T50 CM3 Throttle, Saitek terrible pedals, RiftS

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes please, please, please (have I said please enough?) produce an F16.

 

Ignore the players who say that there is already a DCS quality F16 (in another 3 letter SIM *wink*), there's not, the engine is ancient, the graphics are ancient and the control setup is as clunky as it comes. It's not DCS quality because it's not in DCS. Phrases like "DCS quality" are disingenuous if the module is not in DCS, the old phrase "apples and oranges" comes to mind.

 

This module will make you rich beyond your wildest dreams, your life will become one long party as you will have the means to transplant all those nice vices Amsterdam has to offer to the Caribbean island of your choice.

 

Seriously, there is lots of data out there on this module, it is 4th gen and loved by all. It will sell like viagra in an old folks home because many of us would give our firstborn to have the most well known military aircraft in the world running in the most up to date flight sim (DCS 2.0).

 

I'll get off my knees now, all this pleading is unbecoming, unless I have to do "that" to get the F16, in which case in my stead I will nominate the next person to comment in this thread. I have been told that he or she will gladly make "that" sacrifice for the rest of us and will forever receive our adulation.

 

F16


Edited by Laobi
  • Like 1

My Youtube Channel:

http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCqH078Ef0HENo01LF3xwIvA

Twitter: @CrashLaobi

All of my opinions are my own and are just opinions, as a result they as useless as the opinions of others!

 

My Specs: PC, Chair, Desk, Screen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes please, please, please (have I said please enough?) produce an F16.

 

Ignore the players who say that there is already a DCS quality F16 (in another 3 letter SIM *wink*), there's not, the engine is ancient, the graphics are ancient and the control setup is as clunky as it comes. It's not DCS quality because it's not in DCS. Phrases like "DCS quality" are disingenuous if the module is not in DCS, the old phrase "apples and oranges" comes to mind.

 

This module will make you rich beyond your wildest dreams, your life will become one long party as you will have the means to transplant all those nice vices Amsterdam has to offer to the Caribbean island of your choice.

 

Seriously, there is lots of data out there on this module, it is 4th gen and loved by all. It will sell like viagra in an old folks home because many of us would give our firstborn to have the most well known military aircraft in the world running in the most up to date flight sim (DCS 2.0).

 

I'll get off my knees now, all this pleading is unbecoming, unless I have to do "that" to get the F16, in which case in my stead I will nominate the next person to comment in this thread. I have been told that he or she will gladly make "that" sacrifice for the rest of us and will forever receive our adulation.

 

F16

 

Completely agree. Most other models mentioned have only one purpose as well, which makes marketing a little more difficult. A strike fighter of this caliber is a home run because of its extreme maneuverability, excellent ground attack role, has the only true wild weasel role IRL that everyone loves, and is modern enough to finally go up against the FC3 game aircraft. Once the DCS F-18 comes out the F-16 should be easy to create.

 

The go anywhere, do anything aircraft.... And this coming from someone in the Navy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah Mr. Taylor, you have my eternal gratitude for volunteering in my stead should the devs require the ultimate encouragement. Thank you from the bottom of my heart.

My Youtube Channel:

http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCqH078Ef0HENo01LF3xwIvA

Twitter: @CrashLaobi

All of my opinions are my own and are just opinions, as a result they as useless as the opinions of others!

 

My Specs: PC, Chair, Desk, Screen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah Mr. Taylor, you have my eternal gratitude for volunteering in my stead should the devs require the ultimate encouragement. Thank you from the bottom of my heart.

 

I'm just amazed it's not the obvious choice, unless someone picked it up that we don't know about yet. The information is readily available, single seat, and widely requested. Sure, some older aircraft like the A-6, F-4, F-104, etc would be awesome additions in the future, but with the coding developed for more advanced systems and an entire sim already made (however dated), one would think it would be the obvious choice. Scrolling through these requests and it seems people don't realize that the system has to be almost fully unclassified in order to be a high fidelity model for DCS, which rules out aircraft like the F-117 and (most) newer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree, the F-16 would be a great choice!

"We sleep safe in our beds because rough men stand ready in the day and night to visit violence on those who would do us harm".

---------------------------------------------------------

Intel i-9 9900k @ 5.0 Ghz, EVGA 2080tiFTW3 11Gb, Corsair H115 PRO water cooler, Gigabyte AorusMaster motherboard, EVGA Super Nova 1000 watt G+ powersupply, G.SKILL 64Gb ram @3800 MHz, HP EX 920 M.2 PCIe 3TB,Windows 10Pro x64

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very true, we know more about this aircraft than nearly anything else that is currently in use. The 117 would be based on too much guesswork and personally I would love to see a move away from the FC3 type aircraft being the most modern. It's iconic, the modern Spitfire, I want everything in DCS in the future including civilian aircraft (if for no other reason than to teach people the correct use of IFF, ATC etc., And of course to educate people a little more that military pilots just like soldiers and sailors have to make difficult decisions that if not clearly made within the rules of engagement can end careers and even result in forfeiture of freedom).

My Youtube Channel:

http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCqH078Ef0HENo01LF3xwIvA

Twitter: @CrashLaobi

All of my opinions are my own and are just opinions, as a result they as useless as the opinions of others!

 

My Specs: PC, Chair, Desk, Screen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a Mig-23 or Mig-25 would go well with our US legacy fighters. The PFM/ASM NATO planes we are getting (M2K, F-18, F-14) greatly outclass our only Soviet PFM/ASM plane, the Mig-21.

 

I posted this in the other 'next Razbam aircraft' thread. I'll put it here as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am personally not that huge of a F-16 fan. But if it has to be a Falcon, which I understand is a very popular aircraft, I would like to make the case for the F-16A instead of F-16C. Why would anyone like to have a lesser F-16 if he can have the latest and greatest you ask? For the same reason anyone would like to have a Bf 109 G-6 instead of Bf 109 K-4: The F-16A is a historically significant aircraft. It scored the vast majority of F-16 air-air kills (probably around 80%), it did the Osirak reactor raid and it served as backbone of NATO tactical aviation in Europe during the 1980s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I understand the significance and lasting appeal of the Falcon, I'm one of those who would prefer we get something else from Razbam next.

 

Why has no one attempted a heavy bomber in DCS yet? We are missing a flyable jet in this role in this sim. This is what I would like to see. Something with preferably two or more engines, and something that can bring a lot of ordnance to the party.

 

It would also add another dimension to air to air combat in multiplayer as it would give the upcoming interceptors (like the Mirage) as well as the existing jet planes something to destroy/escort.


Edited by OnlyforDCS

Current specs: Windows 10 Home 64bit, i5-9600K @ 3.7 Ghz, 32GB DDR4 RAM, 1TB Samsung EVO 860 M.2 SSD, GAINWARD RTX2060 6GB, Oculus Rift S, MS FFB2 Sidewinder + Warthog Throttle Quadrant, Saitek Pro rudder pedals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...