Ignoring warnings about pitot heat / engine anti ice etc

Good job. I searched for ice, temperature and anti-ice in the .pdf but wasn't going to spend any real effort for something that doesn't matter.

 

 

Cheers,

 

Don

I understand that. I don’t like it when people just make assumptions without any solid facts. I’m not a Hornet driver, I have thousands of real airliner hours. I go by the facts, even if they don’t align with my expectations. Some have a hard time of doing such.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I understand that. I don’t like it when people just make assumptions without any solid facts. I’m not a Hornet driver, I have thousands of real airliner hours. I go by the facts, even if they don’t align with my expectations. Some have a hard time of doing such.

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Sounds logical. I did the illogical thing, and tried to help while driving. Nobody turn me in to local authorities please.

Cheers,

Don

I understand that. I don’t like it when people just make assumptions without any solid facts. I’m not a Hornet driver, I have thousands of real airliner hours. I go by the facts, even if they don’t align with my expectations. Some have a hard time of doing such.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Here's what you should have said "there's no documented evidence that anti-ice has any practical effect on on the Hornet's performance".

If you're a pilot as you say you are, you should very well understand the importance of specific words, e.g. 'zero' =/= negligible.

Ignoring warnings about pitot heat / engine anti ice etc

Like I said before you’re arguing semantics. You can admit you’re wrong. It’s okay.

I said “zero performance impacts”. And you know, if you’re an “expert”, exactly what I meant.

The poster asked if there were any affects to engine performance. I looked to see if there were in the PERFORMANCE graphs, even went beyond to the emergency procedures, and limitations. Zero. You and only you refuted it, mind it with zero proof to back it up.

I even cross referenced with another jet that is a NATOPS manual just to eliminate the possibility of maybe I wasn’t looking in the right place, JUST. FOR. YOU. Yet you still play the denial game. I’m starting to think you’re just trolling now.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I'm not trolling, I just dislike sloppy language, especially from people who claim to be professionals.

Ignoring warnings about pitot heat / engine anti ice etc

I'm not trolling, I just dislike sloppy language, especially from people who claim to be professionals.

What ever man. Take your Harvard education to good use instead of trying to insult people. Trolls will be trolling.

Just like the other thread. Yeah. You know the one I’m talking about. Arguing the exact same system. You just can’t accept it’s modeled correctly.

Anyways, I’m done with you. Let me know when you get those supporting facts.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro