LastRifleRound Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 You can release now, but the release point is up to 2nm off. Set up a BAD at least 4nm away from your IP on your target. You'll notice the release point refers to a very bizarre location. It appears the BAD itself is way off, not the release point itself. In fact, when entering PI, the initial point itself seems to have shifted. I don't know what's going on here but it's worse than ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ivo Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 You can release now, but the release point is up to 2nm off. Set up a BAD at least 4nm away from your IP on your target. You'll notice the release point refers to a very bizarre location. It appears the BAD itself is way off, not the release point itself. In fact, when entering PI, the initial point itself seems to have shifted. I don't know what's going on here but it's worse than ever. :thumbup: cpu:I7-6700k Z170 16GB Ram DDR4 Gtx 1080 8Gb DDR5 11GBs SSD 500 Gb 2 HDD 1Tb Evga supernova G2 850w Case Bequiet series 800 Silent base Win 10 pro 64 bit My wishlist: F-35/B-17G/F4U Corsair/Yak-3/P-40B Tomahawk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steph21 Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 Already reported in dedicated bug section with track file. Would help a lot if you report bug in dedicated section with track file instead of opening thread in general forum without any info that could help dev to reproduce it :thumbup: Try entering value in meters in the BAD Delta Alt feet windows (left window), it will transform it in feet value when you'll press INS on PCN (bug) Also enter value in km in the BAD Rho window instead of value in nautical mile (bug). You should then get your BAD at the correct location, hence a valid calculated release point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steph21 Posted April 1, 2020 Share Posted April 1, 2020 Seems that Rho value has to be entered in km now, so not a bug. Check here: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=4268309#post4268309 Create BAD with Delta Alt in meters (right window) and Rho in km and you should be fine (change units for ruler in DCS option to get value in metrics). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jojo Posted April 2, 2020 Share Posted April 2, 2020 Guys, if you want to test CCPL + PI (in French), I can’t recommend you enough to run your test on Caucasus map and to use this little piece of software. You input IP and target coordinates and it will give you the necessary offset accurate data.:thumbup: https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3481511&postcount=2 Mirage fanatic ! I7-7700K/ MSI RTX3080/ RAM 64 Go/ SSD / TM Hornet stick-Virpil WarBRD + Virpil CM3 Throttle + MFG Crosswind + Reverb G2. Flickr gallery: https://www.flickr.com/gp/71068385@N02/728Hbi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LastRifleRound Posted April 2, 2020 Author Share Posted April 2, 2020 Guys, if you want to test CCPL + PI (in French), I can’t recommend you enough to run your test on Caucasus map and to use this little piece of software. You input IP and target coordinates and it will give you the necessary offset accurate data.:thumbup: https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3481511&postcount=2 I've tried this software a month ago and it doesn't seem any better than using the ruler. Maybe with this update it's worth another try, this time in KM instead of NM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jojo Posted April 2, 2020 Share Posted April 2, 2020 (edited) I've tried this software a month ago and it doesn't seem any better than using the ruler. Maybe with this update it's worth another try, this time in KM instead of NM It did work for me...azimuth is more accurate. And GBU-12 isn't the best bomb to test, it glides too much IMHO. Edited April 2, 2020 by jojo Mirage fanatic ! I7-7700K/ MSI RTX3080/ RAM 64 Go/ SSD / TM Hornet stick-Virpil WarBRD + Virpil CM3 Throttle + MFG Crosswind + Reverb G2. Flickr gallery: https://www.flickr.com/gp/71068385@N02/728Hbi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LastRifleRound Posted April 2, 2020 Author Share Posted April 2, 2020 I stand corrected. If you deduct .1 from the course solution, it's pretty darn accurate. Accurate enough to hit a chemical tank sized target if you fly to the symbology well (and update your INS and click "VAL" even though the docs tell you not to) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts