DCS: P-47D-30 Discussion

they were but not 1vs 1 for sure mor like 100 vs 1

and we cant realy use 67" becouse random engine jamms happen in matter of minutes of use

on another hand bf109 which was limited to 10 minutes on mw50 can run mw50 all day long

thats problem here

if it was a case p-51 manual would state dont use wep in p-51 becouse you wont make back to base

And this is posted in bug reports and ED knows about this problem?

 

sent from Moto G5 using Tapatalk

This is the most updated cockpit image we have currently.

 

 

Looks really Tempting!

And this is posted in bug reports and ED knows about this problem?

Yeah, they're pretty aware of the problem people have whenever they don't know how to fly the thing and it's better to blame the engine, the model, whatever except learning better. It's being awhile since last time I got P-51 in WWII combat, but I could use it as long as I wanted should I keep my speed up (so engine refrigerates enough). DCS engine model is not like the usual games featuring a "timer" for the engine to burn out once you use WEP, actual airflow is modelled so keeping that airflow coming prevents engine from blowing up, stop it and engine blows out in seconds. Just as it should be and I don't expect P-47 to be any different.

 

 

 

S!

Yeah, they're pretty aware of the problem people have whenever they don't know how to fly the thing and it's better to blame the engine, the model, whatever except learning better. It's being awhile since last time I got P-51 in WWII combat, but I could use it as long as I wanted should I keep my speed up (so engine refrigerates enough). DCS engine model is not like the usual games featuring a "timer" for the engine to burn out once you use WEP, actual airflow is modelled so keeping that airflow coming prevents engine from blowing up, stop it and engine blows out in seconds. Just as it should be and I don't expect P-47 to be any different.

 

 

 

S!

 

+1

Yeah, they're pretty aware of the problem people have whenever they don't know how to fly the thing and it's better to blame the engine, the model, whatever except learning better. It's being awhile since last time I got P-51 in WWII combat, but I could use it as long as I wanted should I keep my speed up (so engine refrigerates enough). DCS engine model is not like the usual games featuring a "timer" for the engine to burn out once you use WEP, actual airflow is modelled so keeping that airflow coming prevents engine from blowing up, stop it and engine blows out in seconds. Just as it should be and I don't expect P-47 to be any different.

S!

 

Once you use wep in p-51 will brake at some point even whne you engage wep for a split second it will brake. for example in spitfire you can run 67" as long as you want it will not jamm like p-51 those are almost exact the same engines. Its definetly not matter of operating plane i use wep only in emergency while i want to gat away from bf109 chasing me i keep fastes speed possible after you brake that wire it is certain that engien will jamm only matter of time

How is our little gal coming along?

 

Im wondering where its at to. I am excited for it.

Edited May 18, 2019 by Snapage

I can't wait for the P47... Favourite WW2 Fighter for me

 

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

I can't wait for the P47... Favourite WW2 Fighter for me

 

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

 

im waiting too

For all you wannabe Jug riders, a little something to wet your appetite whilst you await the "7-ton milk bottle":

 

http://vintageaviationecho.com/p-47-thunderbolt-nellie/

 

Thoroughly fabulous article.

For all you wannabe Jug riders, a little something to wet your appetite whilst you await the "7-ton milk bottle":

 

http://vintageaviationecho.com/p-47-thunderbolt-nellie/

 

Thoroughly fabulous article.

 

That was great thanks for sharing Fenrir

For all you wannabe Jug riders, a little something to wet your appetite whilst you await the "7-ton milk bottle":

 

http://vintageaviationecho.com/p-47-thunderbolt-nellie/

 

Thoroughly fabulous article.

 

Thanks DD_Fenrir :thumbup:

 

The physical air temperature in the cockpit is very high at all times of the year, the air vents doing nothing but "blowing hairdryer hot air into your face".

 

Maybe I should redirect my graphics card cooler exhaust to my face, when time comes :)

Edited June 11, 2019 by Knock-Knock

For all you wannabe Jug riders, a little something to wet your appetite whilst you await the "7-ton milk bottle":

 

http://vintageaviationecho.com/p-47-thunderbolt-nellie/

 

Thoroughly fabulous article.

Wonderful reading indeed!! Thanks for posting mate :thumbup: .

 

 

S!

For all you wannabe Jug riders, a little something to wet your appetite whilst you await the "7-ton milk bottle":

 

http://vintageaviationecho.com/p-47-thunderbolt-nellie/

 

Thoroughly fabulous article.

Thanks for sharing... Brilliant to read!

 

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

So this is the exact one being made by DCS as it’s their aircraft right? Fighter collection

Not any more, Sniper. True, it used to be owned by the Fighter Collection but is now with Air Leasing; however, I suspect Nick Grey will have had some hours in it so it wouldn't surprise me if 'Nellie' become the yardstick against which the DCS flight model will be assessed.

Ya can’t wait to fly her with a real flight model in DCS:thumbup:

I'm sure it has been covered and I won't get my hopes up, but I would love there to be a Razorback model...

 

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

Thanks Fenrir - that cockpit looks like it was designed by a locomotive manufacturer. The landing gear hydraulic manifold must weigh thrity pounds by itself.

Wimps don't fly the Jug!

It shows just how good the fidelity of the cockpit models in DCS are.

 

When I saw that photograph of the cockpit I thought it was a DCS model as it looks just like the quality of the models in DCS

 

Then I looked outisde the cockpit and realized it was the real thing

 

Just WOW!!!

 

I love this dude’s videos!!! Very informative!