SHIPS - Page 4 - ED Forums
 


Notices

View Poll Results: DLC LHA
Yes 232 73.65%
No 83 26.35%
Voters: 315. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-19-2016, 09:15 PM   #31
boedha68
Senior Member
 
boedha68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1,727
Default

Off course i buy. The f-18 by end of the year. If the plans to make it great with animations and a big plus will be crew on the deck!
__________________
New system:I9-9900KS, Kingston 64 GB DDR4 3200Mhz, RTX 2080(OC 2070 Mhz), Corsair H150 Pro RGB, Samsung 970 EVO 1 Tb, Scandisk m2 500 MB, 2 x Crucial 1 Tb, T16000M HOTAS, HP Reverb Professional

Old system:I7-4770K(OC 4.5Ghz), Kingston 24 GB DDR3 1600 Mhz,MSI RTX 2080(OC 2070 Mhz), 2 * 500 GB SSD, 3,5 TB HDD, 55' Samsung 3d tv, Trackir 5, Logitech HD Cam, T16000M HOTAS. All DCS modules, maps and campaigns
boedha68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2016, 04:49 AM   #32
Coops
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Perth, West Aus
Posts: 25
Default

I voted yes and I add to the notation that WASP class with harrier and rotary functionality would be more beneficial to the overall style that itwould bring.. add in LAH and youve got a great little group going
Also there is functionality in the base VIA Combined arms to be able to tack on controller functionality of your group alread if jtac etc.

It would be abig yes from me and same once i got a carrier and an LHD id be less inclined to be on dryu land except for exercises in nevada...
I hope you bring it.
Coops is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2016, 05:04 AM   #33
Highwayman-Ed
Senior Member
 
Highwayman-Ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,506
Send a message via AIM to Highwayman-Ed
Default

Stop wasting time putting poles up, take my money and build it already!

Yes, but give me a floating airfield with multiple parking spots, spawn points, configurable stores, munitions and most importantly, crew. Got to have animated deck crew, even if they're only crowded around static planes loading stores, etc. oh crap, now i've dribbled on my keyboard again.
__________________

Intel i9-9900KF @5.2GHz
MSI Z390 Gaming Pro Carbon
32GB G.Skill Trident Z DDR3200 RAM
MSI RTX 2080 Ti Gaming X Trio
40" Panasonic TH-40DX600U @ 4K
Pimax 5K XR / Oculus Rift CV1 / HTC Vive
Gametrix JetSeat with SimShaker
Windows 10 64 Bit Home Edition


Highwayman-Ed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2016, 05:29 AM   #34
T_A
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Israel
Posts: 664
Default

I voted Yes , but i still don`t see how it can be done regarding non-paying users
__________________
IAF.Tomer
My Rig:
Core i7 6700K + Corsair Hydro H100i GTX
Gigabyte Z170X Gaming 7,G.Skill 32GB DDR4 3000Mhz
Gigabyte GTX 980 OC
Samsung 840EVO 250GB + 3xCrucial 275GB in RAID 0 (1500 MB/s)
Asus MG279Q | TM Warthog + Saitek Combat Pedals + TrackIR 5
T_A is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2016, 06:56 AM   #35
Galwran
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 414
Default

LHA would be nice IF there is capability to use well decks for the amphibious assaults, etc.

But because LHAs lack combat firepower, I would like to have a radar functionality and a combat control center.
Galwran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2016, 07:20 AM   #36
Flappie
Member
 
Flappie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: France
Posts: 483
Default

I assume here the LHA offer would resemble the Kuznetsov offer. Bohemia Interactive already did "that thing" in ArmA2: displaying a module with blurry/crappy textures until you buy it. I think that's an insult to the players, who often pay a large amount of money to get a high-end GFX computer.

Therefore I voted No,because I don't want players to see any difference on screen, depending on what modules they bought.

I also voted No because LHA would mostly be a landing point, and it would be bad that some players can't operate from any landing point available in a mission, just because they don't want to buy a ship (as I don't).

I would only be interested in an LHA module if it was given with a paying aircraft module.
Flappie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2016, 07:27 AM   #37
tom1502
Member
 
tom1502's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: West Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 283
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vampyre View Post
I would expect a full ship module to be crewable with at least the primary positions such as Captain/bridge, Air Boss/Prifly, Weaps/CIC, Cheng/Engineering and ACHO/flight deck control. In this case, if it is a Tarawa or Essex class, an amphibious capability that uses landing craft and LCAC's to move vehicles, troops and supplies ashore would be a must... of course you could just do an Iwo Jima class and only have to worry about the air components.
This. Would want to have RADAR systems etc to make for a co-ordinated mission experience.
__________________
  • Windows 10 Home - 64 Bit
  • Intel Core i7-9770K
  • 32GB DDR4 RAM
  • Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080Ti
  • Oculus Rift S
tom1502 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2016, 07:51 AM   #38
=DECOY=
Senior Member
 
=DECOY='s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: West Sussex, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,240
Default

Yes yes and yes. but as others have said if the price is right

Although considering we have the F14, F18 and AV8b coming (all naval planes) i hope they come as package deals with the seat planes...that would be cool

But how would it work for the members who dont buy them.. would they be able to see, bomb or land on them ?
__________________

Razbam Community Manager
Water cooled i7-7700K oc at 5Ghz | 2080ti | 32GB DDR4 Ram | Virpil T50 | Warthog Throttle | Saitek Peddles | Rift S
Razbam Website | Facebook Page | Offical Razbam YouTube Channel


=DECOY= is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2016, 08:00 AM   #39
Dragonares76
Junior Member
 
Dragonares76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: France
Posts: 49
Default

In fact, you (RAZBAM) could capitalize on such ships :

While developping the ship, think to other aircrafts or helicopters you could develop to "match" with this ship as you already do with you poll for Big Helicopters.

You can spend time (of course some money ^^) to create the ship that will match further numerous flying vehicules. So your investment, not paid by the player (and getting rid of paying/non paying players), will be a huge argument if the ship is provided with one of your modules
=> a constant developping ship with a lot of aircraft that will perfectly operate from it in the future !
__________________
"Clear to startup ... Contact ..."

Geoffrey Wellum - First Light

Dragonares76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2016, 08:24 AM   #40
X93355
Member
 
X93355's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand
Posts: 468
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prowler111 View Post
I would like to know your input on this issue
Will you buy a DLC LHA?
Hi Prowler,

I think any new ships with high detail is a plus. Software programming is time consuming so speaking for myself I am happy to pay for new ships etc, if they are of the detail that was recently shown by ED and with what Leatherneck are planning.

A Hermes class carrier with Sea King and Harrier
__________________
InWin S Frame with Asus Z170 | i7-6700K @ 4.5 Water Cooled CPU and Graphics | 16GB DDR4 | GTX1070 | 240GB M.2 SSD | Warthog Hotas | MFG Crosswind | 40" Samsung 4K | CV1 | Replica MB Mk10 Ejection Seat with Gametrix 908
X93355 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:38 PM. vBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys. Powered by vBulletin®.
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.