Jump to content

Everyday gaming and choice of gpu (financial perspective)


Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,

 

 

First off, this is not a question specifically about DCS which, as we all know, is quite demanding on cpu and gpu.

 

 

My question is about a very average gamer, playing AAA titles at the "holy grail" performance 60 fps on high setting (playing mmos, shooters, rts etc)

 

 

 

Does it make more sense to buy a 800$ gpu now and keep it for 4 years or a 400$ now, use it for 2 years, then another 400$ gpu at the time and keep it another 2 years ? (numbers dont really matter, it's mainly a question of X $ for 4 years or X/2 for 2 years then same upgrade)

 

 

 

That question could apply to cpus as well but i feel like cpus are rarely the bottleneck for this scenario.

 

 

Some gpu reviews include a Cost-per-frame chart and older cards 1 or 2 generations back (so 2 or 4 years usually) always seem to be interesting, hence my question.

 

 

Looking forward to read your thoughts on which approach is the most efficient.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I have a 2080. Performes well in all games except DCS in vr. So I go to the 3080. But I think for Normal gaming I can keep it for Another 2 years. In your position go for the 3070 should cost 500 dollars and some more performance than the 2080ti.

New system:I9-9900KS, Kingston 128 GB DDR4 3200Mhz, MSI RTX 4090, Corsair H150 Pro RGB, 2xSamsung 970 EVO 2Tb, 2xsamsung 970 EVO 1 TB, Scandisk m2 500 MB, 2 x Crucial 1 Tb, T16000M HOTAS, HP Reverb Professional 2, Corsair 750 Watt.

 

Old system:I7-4770K(OC 4.5Ghz), Kingston 24 GB DDR3 1600 Mhz,MSI RTX 2080(OC 2070 Mhz), 2 * 500 GB SSD, 3,5 TB HDD, 55' Samsung 3d tv, Trackir 5, Logitech HD Cam, T16000M HOTAS. All DCS modules, maps and campaigns:pilotfly:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One important factor that you've left out is the resolution you're going to use it for.

i386DX40@42 MHz w/i387 CP, 4 MB RAM (8*512 kB), Trident 8900C 1 MB w/16-bit RAMDAC ISA, Quantum 340 MB UDMA33, SB 16, DOS 6.22 w/QEMM + Win3.11CE, Quickshot 1btn 2axis, Numpad as hat. 2 FPH on a good day, 1 FPH avg.

 

DISCLAIMER: My posts are still absolutely useless. Just finding excuses not to learn the F-14 (HB's Swansong?).

 

Annoyed by my posts? Please consider donating. Once the target sum is reached, I'll be off to somewhere nice I promise not to post from. I'd buy that for a dollar!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

 

That's more of a look at the gpu history and upgrade cycle discussion than anything really specific. Let's assume the resolution stays the same over all the years played. Again, I used 4 years as an example but I could also use one big gpu every 6 years or 2 mid range gpu every 3 years at half the price.

 

 

Although, I'd say 5-6 years is probably the maximum years one could used a high end gpu and sustain the performances i described above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

for 400 you get half the performance now and in 4 years the full performance for the other 400

for 800 you enjoy full performance for 8 years

for 0 you get no performance for 8 years

 

if money is no issue you are an ... and the decision is easy for you :-)

VIC-20@1.108 MHz, onboard GPU, 5KB RAM, μυωπία goggles, Competition Pro HOTAS

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

the regular upgrade strategy gives more options. You can reevalute where you´re at and how things have evolved.

 

Unfortunately, there might a lower bound on how much you have to spend to get to certain level. I personally don´t like to migrate my complete software packages to a new system. Therefore I invest more and stick with that for longer. A graphics card upgrade along the way gives you a bit more life for your other components and you could carry it over to a newer CPU.

 

I guess, the used market is no real option?! 800$ new -> sell for 200$ and get a new one?

:juggle:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From a Financial perspective, in my opinion, it is best to avoid the purchase of brand new GPUs .. so, since I started playing DCS on 2013 I have opted for the purchase of second hand GPUs.

 

I have found that on my country I can get for around US$ 300 a GPU from two generations ago, and thanks to this lower cost I'm able to change GPU every 18 months, currently being with a nVidia 1070ti.

 

At least for me, there is no way I could afford a brand new card with the same performance.

 

For work: iMac mid-2010 of 27" - Core i7 870 - 6 GB DDR3 1333 MHz - ATI HD5670 - SSD 256 GB - HDD 2 TB - macOS High Sierra

For Gaming: 34" Monitor - Ryzen 3600X - 32 GB DDR4 2400 - nVidia GTX1070ti - SSD 1.25 TB - HDD 10 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Cougar - Oculus Rift CV1

Mobile: iPad Pro 12.9" of 256 GB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I've seen, it's probably better to do the $800 and skip GPU generations. You usually get a 20% boost per GPU generation, so if you skip a generation, your looking at a 40-50% performance improvement when you upgrade. $400 for only a 20% improvement just doesn't feel worth it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally have the notion of upgrading every other gen, or even every 2 gens. Whether a person has money to burn or not, upgrading is like resale : if you can't get at least double, it wasn't worth the trouble.

 

I have a 1080ti. 2000s were waaay overpriced and seems 30-40% faster maybe? 3000s are better priced and 30-40% faster than the 2000s? Seems like a good time to upgrade (for me) and I only gained by skipping the 2000s. If I get a 3080 I should roughly double my horsepower, and for the low-low cost of what, $700-800? Further offset if I can sell my 1080ti for $300-400 in the meantime.

Де вороги, знайдуться козаки їх перемогти.

5800x3d * 3090 * 64gb * Reverb G2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...