[CORRECT AS IS]Saved Markpoints are deleted.

Saved "Markpoints" are deleted when you return to the airport and decide to retool the plane at the airport.

One more note. Saved "mark points" are no longer visible on the SA as soon as it lands at the airport.

Really Saved Marking of markpoints will be deleted when the plane is rearmed? The pilot ne can save them otherwise so as not to search the target again after replenishing ammunition? For example, attach it to a waypoint? It is doubtful that anyone would cause the pilot such difficulties during a combat flight.

Really Saved Marking of markpoints will be deleted when the plane is rearmed? The pilot ne can save them otherwise so as not to search the target again after replenishing ammunition? For example, attach it to a waypoint? It is doubtful that anyone would cause the pilot such difficulties during a combat flight.

IRL pilots aren't hopping up and down like bunnies. You plan a sortie for hours and hours, you fly the sortie for hours and hours, then you land and debrief.

Real life isn't DCS

Yes, but the data from the on-board computer does not automatically disappear, because the pilot, for example, landed somewhere to refuel. Such a situation cannot be ruled out, especially during the war.

Yes, but the data from the on-board computer does not automatically disappear, because the pilot, for example, landed somewhere to refuel. Such a situation cannot be ruled out, especially during the war.

What are you trying to argue? That Boeing got it wrong and that 5 mins of theory crafting online will let you know that pilots are routinely hopping up and down quick enough for markpoints to still hold any kind of relevance post sortie?

Such data may be relevant to others. I just can't believe it disappears automatically without anyone's consent. Rather, such data is deleted by pilots or ground crews.

Such data may be relevant to others. I just can't believe it disappears automatically without anyone's consent. Rather, such data is deleted by pilots or ground crews.

The funny thing is: this has nothing to do with what anyone "believes", only with being able to deliver proof that it works otherwise. Can you prove that?

(and seriously, weird design, UI or workflow choices in applied systems are nothing new, neither are they in the military)

A small fix. Removing all "marker points" causes a touchdown on the runway. The moment the wheels touch the runway, "mark points" are deleted. So there is no human interference when replenishing ammunition. I could understand it before, but now it becomes weird to say the least.

IRL pilots aren't hopping up and down like bunnies. You plan a sortie for hours and hours, you fly the sortie for hours and hours, then you land and debrief.

 

Real life isn't DCS

Although what you say, in a rather odd way, is true, you can't deny that the man's got a point. It does feel strange, that only mark points are deleted without pilot consent. "Correct as is" is an infamous tag nowadays and can be easily ruled out in a flick.

"Correct as is" is an infamous tag nowadays and can be easily ruled out in a flick.

Same question to you - if you can easily rule out that "Correct as is" is wrong, where is your proof?

Same question to you - if you can easily rule out that "Correct as is" is wrong, where is your proof?

I didn't say I can, don't be so toxic. I also think it might be correct. Take it easy, or a break.

I am not toxic, YOU said it can be ruled out in a flick. Can it, though?

I am not toxic, YOU said it can be ruled out in a flick. Can it, though?

let it go kid, no need to start a fight.