[Duster]

Hello,
Does ED intend to expand on this long-mistored scenario like Nevada?
There are many towns and small airports only at photo level ... with the exception of Las Vegas the rest has remained very poor and is never mentioned in the soon updates.
Edwars AFB in the MU map position, it would be a nice hit for the simulation ...but some more small town and airport would already be something.
ED, let us dream ...

Ciao

[Gierasimov]

With ED current pipeline of things to create/finish, I don't think revisiting this map is even remotely close.

One day, surely we will have the World, that's the ultimate aim as they said. Additions to maps - I don't think so.

[Duster]

Originally Posted by Gierasimov

With ED current pipeline of things to create/finish, I don't think revisiting this map is even remotely close.

One day, surely we will have the World, that's the ultimate aim as they said. Additions to maps - I don't think so.

It is useless to make countless new and beautiful modules if the scenarios remain old and unfinished. (IMHO)
I wish you a good day.

Ciao

[zhukov032186]

Considering the focus of the map is the NTTR and EAFB itself, outlying towns and facilities are somewhat irrelevant.

[MurderOne]

NAS Fallon would be a welcome, and dare I say needed addition to the NTTR.

[Gierasimov]

Originally Posted by MurderOne

NAS Fallon would be a welcome, and dare I say needed addition to the NTTR.

https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php...7&postcount=53

Dear all,

As has been mentioned before, adding Fallon NAS and its range (and buffer area) to the NTTR map will not happen for several reasons:

1- While Fallon NAS is barely in the current NTTR map, the entire range and buffer area is certainly not.

2- The NTTR map is already as max size that can support current RAM min-specs (8 GB).

3- To add such a huge amount of work would also result in a higher price; many users would have a fit.

4- The NTTR map is centered on the NTTR, not all of Nevada. Way out of scope.

5- Based on customer feedback, we have heard overwhelming that most customers want new combat theater maps, not training maps.

6- A Fallon NAS map would be a great opportunity for a 3rd party.

7- All our map resources are tied up with new map projects for the next several years.

While I understand the desire, I’m afraid it’s not feasible for all the above reasons. Perhaps a qualified 3rd party though may wish to take it on.

Thanks!

[Art-J]

ED guys have stated a few times the map is considered feature complete, so unless they decide to give it a facelift in next few years time, similar to situation with Caucasus, I wouldn't expect any additions anytime soon.

[JayBird]

As much as we may want it, it's not going to happen.

Hopefully ED can step on the gas with the map development. I know I'm pretty burned out on the current map selection.

[Gierasimov]

Funny, I have not seen entire PG yet and I have had it since day 1 of Early Access.

[BIGNEWY]

Originally Posted by Duster

Hello,
Does ED intend to expand on this long-mistored scenario like Nevada?
There are many towns and small airports only at photo level ... with the exception of Las Vegas the rest has remained very poor and is never mentioned in the soon updates.
Edwars AFB in the MU map position, it would be a nice hit for the simulation ...but some more small town and airport would already be something.
ED, let us dream ...

Ciao

Hi

NTTR is feature complete, apart from a few bug fixes there will be no further work on the terrain at this time.

Thanks