give some love to the Kurfürst model - Page 3 - ED Forums
 


Notices

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-21-2017, 04:49 AM   #21
SiThSpAwN
Community Manager
 
SiThSpAwN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 20,093
Reputation power: 98
SiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to behold
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad Dog 7.62 View Post
Its too bad this module seems to be needing some attention. With Normandy on the horizon, this would be a must purchase if it were up to par.
I am not sure I would go that far, its an older model sure, and I believe created by someone different back then, but its hardly hard on the eyes, nor does it detract from my personal joy of flying it, all things pointed out have to be low-priority compared to new WWII objects and such. Fact is most of the pictures in the OP arent even visible while piloting the aircraft, I couldnt imagine reporting these issues right now with all they have on their plate.
__________________
Nick Grey - "I have had the privilege of flying most marks of Spit, the I, V, IX, XIV, XIX and enjoyed working with Eagle to make this simulation of the IX the 'mutt's nuts'."


Last edited by SiThSpAwN; 04-21-2017 at 04:52 AM.
SiThSpAwN is offline  
Old 04-21-2017, 06:58 AM   #22
Conroy
Member
 
Conroy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Italy
Posts: 473
Reputation power: 5
Conroy will become famous soon enoughConroy will become famous soon enoughConroy will become famous soon enough
Default

We buy Normandy first of all to fly aircrafts not to drive tanks.
I 100% agree about K4 polycount. It's not so bad, but it could have been much better as for the DB sound. Definitely DCS Messerschmitt would deserve some more love.

Please provide the same quality standard.
__________________

Last edited by Conroy; 04-21-2017 at 07:55 AM.
Conroy is offline  
Old 04-21-2017, 08:17 AM   #23
Falcoblu
Senior Member
 
Falcoblu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Italy
Posts: 1,223
Reputation power: 3
Falcoblu will become famous soon enoughFalcoblu will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Conroy View Post
We buy Normandy first of all to fly aircrafts not to drive tanks.
I 100% agree about K4 polycount. It's not so bad, but it could have been much better as for the DB sound. Definitely DCS Messerschmitt would deserve some more love.

Please provide the same quality standard.
+1...

In fact, Normandy should be first of all in airplane simulator not a tanks simulator.

And the best quality standard should be implemented first for airplanes and then for the rest.

And at 109K there are still no pods with cannons and rockets ...


Last edited by Falcoblu; 04-21-2017 at 08:20 AM.
Falcoblu is offline  
Old 04-21-2017, 09:53 AM   #24
razo+r
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 3,380
Reputation power: 14
razo+r is just really nicerazo+r is just really nicerazo+r is just really nicerazo+r is just really nicerazo+r is just really nicerazo+r is just really nicerazo+r is just really nicerazo+r is just really nicerazo+r is just really nicerazo+r is just really nice
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
I am not sure I would go that far, its an older model sure, and I believe created by someone different back then, but its hardly hard on the eyes, nor does it detract from my personal joy of flying it, all things pointed out have to be low-priority compared to new WWII objects and such. Fact is most of the pictures in the OP arent even visible while piloting the aircraft, I couldnt imagine reporting these issues right now with all they have on their plate.
As already said, lot's of things can be seen from the normal position with normal zoom... Otherwise i wouldn't be bothered by that if i can't see those things
__________________
Maximus VII Ranger, 4790K @ 4.00 Ghz, ASUS GTX 1070 O8G, 16 GB non-oc RAM, 250 GB SAMSUNG EVO 850 SSD, 2TB HDD, Win 10 64-bit
razo+r is offline  
Old 04-21-2017, 11:53 AM   #25
SiThSpAwN
Community Manager
 
SiThSpAwN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 20,093
Reputation power: 98
SiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to behold
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by razo+r View Post
As already said, lot's of things can be seen from the normal position with normal zoom... Otherwise i wouldn't be bothered by that if i can't see those things
I still dont see anything high-priority that they should stop and redo or go over the model.
__________________
Nick Grey - "I have had the privilege of flying most marks of Spit, the I, V, IX, XIV, XIX and enjoyed working with Eagle to make this simulation of the IX the 'mutt's nuts'."

SiThSpAwN is offline  
Old 04-21-2017, 11:59 AM   #26
hughlb
Member
 
hughlb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 375
Reputation power: 3
hughlb has a spectacular aura abouthughlb has a spectacular aura abouthughlb has a spectacular aura abouthughlb has a spectacular aura about
Default

I wouldn't be surprised if it will be updated at one point or another, ED seem to do this. I guess it depends how long they plan to officially support it. I used to think the IL2 Cliffs of Dover models looked amazing, but not anymore. Someone in an earlier post commented on not updating as it will adversely affect performance. Poly count doesn't really have the same impact as shaders and fill rate, so I wouldn't worry about poly count too much
__________________
| Windows 10 | I7 4790K @ 4.4ghz | LG 43UD79-B | Gainward Phoenix 1070 GLH | 16GB Corsair Vengeance 2400 DDR3 | Asrock Fatal1ty Z97 | Samsung EVO 850 500GB | SanDisk 240GB Extreme Pro | Coolermaster Vanguard S 650Watt 80+ | Fractal Design R4 | VKB Gunfighter MK1 | MFG Crosswind Graphite | KW-908 JetSeat Sim Edition | TrackIR 5 |

hughlb is offline  
Old 04-21-2017, 12:32 PM   #27
SiThSpAwN
Community Manager
 
SiThSpAwN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 20,093
Reputation power: 98
SiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to behold
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hughlb View Post
I wouldn't be surprised if it will be updated at one point or another, ED seem to do this. I guess it depends how long they plan to officially support it. I used to think the IL2 Cliffs of Dover models looked amazing, but not anymore. Someone in an earlier post commented on not updating as it will adversely affect performance. Poly count doesn't really have the same impact as shaders and fill rate, so I wouldn't worry about poly count too much
No doubt that down the road it could see an update, but right now, getting to the great merge and getting other things down are going to be higher priority.
__________________
Nick Grey - "I have had the privilege of flying most marks of Spit, the I, V, IX, XIV, XIX and enjoyed working with Eagle to make this simulation of the IX the 'mutt's nuts'."

SiThSpAwN is offline  
Old 04-21-2017, 12:39 PM   #28
Conroy
Member
 
Conroy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Italy
Posts: 473
Reputation power: 5
Conroy will become famous soon enoughConroy will become famous soon enoughConroy will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
I still dont see anything high-priority that they should stop and redo or go over the model.
So, for you, this is acceptable for DCS standard? Just to know. I'm not talking about Daimler Benz sound that's is a dead horse, but at least, here, we have some very good mods.

__________________
Conroy is offline  
Old 04-21-2017, 12:46 PM   #29
SiThSpAwN
Community Manager
 
SiThSpAwN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 20,093
Reputation power: 98
SiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to beholdSiThSpAwN is a splendid one to behold
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Conroy View Post
So, for you, this is acceptable for DCS standard? Just to know. I'm not talking about Daimler Benz sound that's is a dead horse, but at least, here, we have some very good mods.
What I SAID was its not going to be a high priority, meaning they have many things going on right now before they revisit this model.

I also SAID I dont see anything that takes away from my personal enjoyment of the module.

As for the sounds, they were recorded from a 109, no not a K, but from an actual 109, but that is sort of OT here isnt it.
__________________
Nick Grey - "I have had the privilege of flying most marks of Spit, the I, V, IX, XIV, XIX and enjoyed working with Eagle to make this simulation of the IX the 'mutt's nuts'."


Last edited by SiThSpAwN; 04-21-2017 at 12:55 PM.
SiThSpAwN is offline  
Old 04-21-2017, 01:00 PM   #30
Conroy
Member
 
Conroy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Italy
Posts: 473
Reputation power: 5
Conroy will become famous soon enoughConroy will become famous soon enoughConroy will become famous soon enough
Default

If you give this kinde of answer, is not more an OT, but probaly an answer also for the 3D problem.

I don't know if you are really interested in WW2, i don't think so, but an answer like this about DB, believe me, is not really acceptable like the low quality of this K4 module....low quality for DCS standard off course.

Normandy is close to be released, and we are talking about Messerschimitt. This is more than an high priority.
__________________
Conroy is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:32 PM. vBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys. Powered by vBulletin®.
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.