[sorcer3r]

Originally Posted by blkspade

Except 120mi isn't far when your simulating a battlefield based around aerial combat. Its not likely most mission designers are going to place massive amounts of ground units where human interaction is unintended. An enemy/own EWR or AWACS could be well outside of your bubble but be constantly interacting with you at the same time. Or a long range sam site that exist solely to keep out of an area or on task. The entire area of play is already functionally a bubble (since the whole world isn't simulated), just a really large one, that still is technically too small for certain scenarios.

That's not a problem. Just create different bubbles for tanks, SAMs and aircraft etc.

[MacEwan]

Outlawal you obviously have some sort of comprehension problem or something. My comments aren't directed at what ED said, they are directed at the people saying "Don't say anything negative because if you do then it will push the release of 2.0 even further". I'm just saying that I don't believe this to be the case.

[Ramjet]

Has there ever been any word on the state of trees in EDGE 2.0?

[outlawal2]

LOL

Yeah I have a comprehension problem..


WOW

[cichlidfan]

Originally Posted by MacEwan

I find it hard to believe that ED is delaying the release of 2.0 ...

Maybe you should reread your own post then.

[Haukka81]

Originally Posted by Ramjet

Has there ever been any word on the state of trees in EDGE 2.0?

They may still be ghost trees if performance will be problem. I hope that we can least make it option. I like to get solid trees for my chopper flights.

[ff4life4]

Originally Posted by MacEwan

I find it hard to believe that ED is delaying the release of 2.0 because a couple of people on a forum posted some negative comments. ED has been around long enough to know that you can't please everyone all of the time and that the internet gives anonymous assholes a medium to troll without any real world consequence.

Do not flame me, but I don't think hes declaring that it is delayed because of comments, its just that people were speculating that the images were removed, and he was stating he didn't believe that negative comments would influence ED. But what the h*ll do I know.

EDIT: But I agree its confusing.

[MacEwan]

Originally Posted by MacEwan

I find it hard to believe that ED is delaying the release of 2.0

Originally Posted by cichlidfan

Maybe you should reread your own post then.

Fine, you're right. I should have said "I find it hard to believe that ED would delay the release of 2.0"

Is my intent behind the post clearer now?

[ff4life4]

Originally Posted by MacEwan

Fine, you're right. I should have said "I find it hard to believe that ED would delay the release of 2.0"

Is my intent behind the post clearer now?

Yes Would is better

[NineLine]

New clean thread coming to replace this one. Stay tuned.