[NineLine]

Originally Posted by KingKenny04

If the attitude of ED is that because people don't play multiplayer it isn't worth working on, then you have created a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Please re-read Wags response above, I think you will find that is not the case.

[microvax]

Originally Posted by NineLine

It was not deleted. I wanted Wags message on top and not to get lost, so new discussion.

These posts show as deleted in the closed thread. I read them and know at least one of them was purely constructive. And I dont see them merged in this thread either.

[NineLine]

Originally Posted by Gliptal

Would a mission that populates the NTTR (otherwise barren) with the proper and realistic ranges and targets be considered "over-populated"?

Depends on who is connecting to it and their connection speed and computer specs. They go hand in hand.

[Kocrachon]

Originally Posted by NineLine

You are talking in the Multiplayer section right now just as an FYI.

I get that, I am referring to your original response that created the firestorm..

[NineLine]

Originally Posted by microvax

[IMG][/IMG]

These posts show as deleted in the closed thread. I read them and know at least one of them was purely constructive. And I dont see them merged in this thread either.

Did you even read the reason why they were removed?

Also please review the rules.

1.3 Administrative actions against forum members are not subject to public discussion. If you feel an action against you was unjust or otherwise inappropriate, please use the Private Messaging (PM) system to appeal the action to other forum staff members or the forum administrator.

If you have an issue, PM me or another moderator about it.

Please get back on topic.

[NineLine]

Originally Posted by Kocrachon

I get that, I am referring to your original response that created the firestorm..

If you read what it was being replied to, then it might make more sense, if not then I will explain. He was taking a very unscientific sampling of current users in MP, so in return I took a very unscientific sample of people upset with MP.

ED's position has never been to forget about MP, and the fact that people got upset because someone moved a post to the wishlist section is just as silly as thinking only 50 people want better MP experience.

[NineLine]

Originally Posted by Cisco

Thats completely untrue.

Completely?

I have seen it first hand, If I try and connect to a server with a 40 ping, I have a much better time than I do with a 400 ping. I dont time out on 40 ping server.

As stated, ED knows they have some work to do, but we as users need to make sure we meet the specs of the game as well, or that the servers are up to the task, or that we arent building insane missions full of crazy scripts and other things that suck up resources. It all adds up.

[Silver_Dragon]

Originally Posted by NineLine

How much ram do you have?

NineLine, I have the same issue. Only can play on SP and some "lights" servers. With 16 Gbs RAM DDR 3 has imposible connect to a normal server or populate servers. I think purchase an new computer with 32-64 Gb RAM on a far future to fix the issue. That problem coming with the 2.5.

[Pikey]

Reading through the counter arguments about "not as much Multiplayer" I think the current stats support the argument that MP isn't good enough.


If you look at registered users on servers such as Blue Flag, you see people come, and then they



GO.


It doesn't sustain people on a daily basis.


Saying there is few multiplayer, when there's so many squadrons out there shows that there is a PROBLEM. The numbers are there, they just don't want to play every day, keep trying to, and your guess is as good as mine why they don't stay.

[MarkP]

We are flying twice a week with our squad in MP and do not have issues that bad.
Once in a month we got a desync but other than that no problems.

Sorry community, but i think its pretty stable