Bearskin Posted February 23, 2019 Share Posted February 23, 2019 My current rig, MVF, 3770k @ 4.4, GTX970, 16 gig RAM, 27" 1080p 144Hz monitor. DCS world default high settings with view set to ultra. The SU27 mission I am getting around 90FPS, the free flight Huey over the Vegas strip is down to 45 FPS (CPU 24%, GPU 99%). I have looked on youtube for benches but for DCS 2.5, I only seem to find 4k with VR or XX80 / ti videos. So for DCS world is a 8GB card better (1070) or will a 2060 / 1660ti 6GB do the same job. I have seen all the bench videos of the 2060 equalling the 1080 / 1070ti but is 8 GB better for DCS. Thanks for reading GigabyteZ390, 9900K, RTX2080, 32 gig RAM,TM Warthog, Cessna Pro Pedals, Pico 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dburne Posted February 23, 2019 Share Posted February 23, 2019 More is always better imho. Don B EVGA Z390 Dark MB | i9 9900k CPU @ 5.1 GHz | Gigabyte 4090 OC | 64 GB Corsair Vengeance 3200 MHz CL16 | Corsair H150i Pro Cooler |Virpil CM3 Stick w/ Alpha Prime Grip 200mm ext| Virpil CM3 Throttle | VPC Rotor TCS Base w/ Alpha-L Grip| Point Control V2|Varjo Aero| Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BitMaster Posted February 23, 2019 Share Posted February 23, 2019 More is better. It mainly depends on your screen resolution. People with 16GB cards already report 14+GB VRAM usage, so paint your pic. Gigabyte Aorus X570S Master - Ryzen 5900X - Gskill 64GB 3200/CL14@3600/CL14 - Asus 1080ti EK-waterblock - 4x Samsung 980Pro 1TB - 1x Samsung 870 Evo 1TB - 1x SanDisc 120GB SSD - Heatkiller IV - MoRa3-360LT@9x120mm Noctua F12 - Corsair AXi-1200 - TiR5-Pro - Warthog Hotas - Saitek Combat Pedals - Asus PG278Q 27" QHD Gsync 144Hz - Corsair K70 RGB Pro - Win11 Pro/Linux - Phanteks Evolv-X Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts