Raven (Elysian Angel) Posted August 15, 2018 Share Posted August 15, 2018 I hope the R-27 family also could benefit for that. So do I, but I reckon it depends on the availability of proper reliable information: based on wind tunnel test data Spoiler Ryzen 9 5900X | 64GB G.Skill TridentZ 3600 | Gigabyte RX6900XT | ASUS ROG Strix X570-E GAMING | Samsung 990Pro 2TB + 960Pro 1TB NMVe | HP Reverb G2 Pro Flight Trainer Puma | VIRPIL MT-50CM2+3 base / CM2 x2 grip with 200 mm S-curve extension + CM3 throttle + CP2/3 + FSSB R3L + VPC Rotor TCS Plus base with SharKa-50 grip mounted on Monstertech MFC-1 | TPR rudder pedals OpenXR | PD 1.0 | 100% render resolution | DCS "HIGH" preset Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antagonist Posted August 15, 2018 Share Posted August 15, 2018 So do I, but I reckon it depends on the availability of proper reliable information: We know the R-27 missile family's shape, and wind tunnel test software has become pretty accurate nowadays. On account of that, I think eventually there will be an update for all missiles currently implemented in DCS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cik Posted August 16, 2018 Share Posted August 16, 2018 guidance logic is what screws you, not necessarily speed. launched from 1.4m and high the R-27ER achieves a really great range. problem is 1. chaff will decoy with 100% effectiveness, and 2. it will "follow your nose" so tiny jinks on your part will have it doing 100% fin deflection the whole way in while it bleeds off it's mach 5 energy achieving nothing of value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts