Jump to content

DELETE PLEASE MODS


LORD FLASHEART

Recommended Posts

What do you want to see, I have a MSI 2080 TI X Trio running in 4K with almost all setting maxed. Msaa is turned off since its not needed in 4K and I'm using reshader as well. I also have Oculas Rift.


Edited by Naruto

System specs: Intel i9-9900k OC 5.1Ghz, 32 GB PC3200 G.SKILL TridentZ RGB RAM, Asus Strix 2080 TI OC SLI, Asus Z390 Workstation Pro, 970 EVO 1TB M.2 PCIe NVMe and many other SSDs, Alienware 3418DW Widescreen 120 Hz G-Sync Monitor, Corsair H150i PRO RGB CPU Cooler

 

Flightgear: HP Reverb Pro, Samsung Odyssey +, Virpil MongoosT-50CM2 Grip & T-50CM2 Base, TM Warthog, TM TPR Rudder, TM Cougar MFDs, Jetseat, Trackir 5, Sennheiser Game One Headset

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am running a 40" 4k monitoring on a 1080TI, you mentioned you're getting 60 frames per second, I get 40 frames per second with everything maxed out so for an extra 20 frames would you consider it worth the £1300?

Custom built W10 Pro 64Bit, Intel Core i9 9900k, Asus ROG Maximus Code XI Z390, 64GB DDR4 3200 RGB, Samsung 1TB NVme M.2 Drive, Gigabyte AORUS 2080TI, 40" Iiyama Display. Wacom Cintiq Pro 24, HOTAS Virpil T50 Stick / FA-18C TM Stick and Virpil T50 Throttle, MFG Crosswind Graphite Pedals. HP Reverb

 

SPECTER



[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Lead Terrain Developer / Texture Artist

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am running a 40" 4k monitoring on a 1080TI, you mentioned you're getting 60 frames per second, I get 40 frames per second with everything maxed out so for an extra 20 frames would you consider it worth the £1300?

 

On my OC 2080 Ti, I get average 75 FPS with everything maxed except MSAA is off since its not needed in 4K and mirrors off which I never use anyways and that with reshader on too. Reshader eats about 5 - 10 FPS and mirrors eat about 10 FPS. 75 FPS vs 40 is a no brainer, so much smoother on a 4K monitor. If i use MSAA to 4X then I drop about 7 FPS and average around 68 FPS I also have 32 Gig of 3200 DDR4 ram and 8700K CPU OC to 5 Ghz. If you got the money, almost double performance is better IMO.

System specs: Intel i9-9900k OC 5.1Ghz, 32 GB PC3200 G.SKILL TridentZ RGB RAM, Asus Strix 2080 TI OC SLI, Asus Z390 Workstation Pro, 970 EVO 1TB M.2 PCIe NVMe and many other SSDs, Alienware 3418DW Widescreen 120 Hz G-Sync Monitor, Corsair H150i PRO RGB CPU Cooler

 

Flightgear: HP Reverb Pro, Samsung Odyssey +, Virpil MongoosT-50CM2 Grip & T-50CM2 Base, TM Warthog, TM TPR Rudder, TM Cougar MFDs, Jetseat, Trackir 5, Sennheiser Game One Headset

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am also on a 1080Ti....

 

I am playing on a 3940x1080 monitor + deported MFD's..

 

with almost everything maxed out I am at about 75FPS average..

 

I really like playing with 90+ fps though, so I might buy a 2080Ti before xmas

[sIGPIC]https://forums.eagle.ru/signaturepics/sigpic70550_3.gif[/sIGPIC]

Asus Z390-H - SSD M.2 EVO 970 - Intel I9 @5.0ghz - 32gb DDR4 4000 - EVGA 3090 - Cougar FSSB + Virpil WRBRD + Hornet Stick - Thrustmaster TPR Pedal + WinWing MIP + Orion + TO and CO pannels - Track IR5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am running a 40" 4k monitoring on a 1080TI, you mentioned you're getting 60 frames per second, I get 40 frames per second with everything maxed out so for an extra 20 frames would you consider it worth the £1300?

 

Hey this is Boscoh from the vid. Hard to say. Fortunately I didn't have a 1080Ti so I didn't have to contemplate that problem. For me it was a no brainer coming from a Radeon 7950.

 

Like I said in the vid, if you want the most fps in 4k (or VR) from a single card, the 2080ti is the way. If you're happy with what you have and dcs is really the only thing you play, then wait and see how raytracing develops.

3800X, X570, 32GB 3600, RTX 2080Ti, SSD, Odyssey+ VR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would love to see a head to head with the 1080Ti and the 2080Ti. From what I've heard is that the 1080Ti may still perform a bit better in DCS for now because the drivers aren't optomized for the antiquated DX we run in DCS(obviously Vulkan API will change all of that)...Wonder if that holds out in testing and hopefully not soon because I have every intention of buying the 2080Ti...and the 9900K lol:D


Edited by Greekbull

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | ASUS Crosshair Hero X670E | 64GB G Skill Trident Z DDR5 6000 | Nvidia RTX 4090 FE| Samsung EVO Plus 6 TB M.2 PCIe SSDs | TM Hornet Stick/WinWing Hornet Throttle and MIP | VPC T-50 Stick Base | TM TPR Rudder Pedals W/Damper | Varjo Aero/Pimax Crystal

VFA-25 Fist of the Fleet

Carrier Strike Group One(CSG-1) Discord
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having tested now the 1080 Ti vs the 2080 Ti with all manner of System Option (and Pixel Density) changes, I am just not that stoked on the 2080 Ti. Right now, if you are wealthy enough to spend $700 or more for ~ 34% extra performance, .... have at it. But for the majority of us, it is middling more performance for a huge price increase. My recommendation is to wait for 18 months or so until the 2080 Ti's drop down under $850 or so, or just wait until the next GPU release in 2020 to 2021 or so.

 

It's not 34% in VR though - you're getting 50% better frames?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your wish is answered. I am currently testing single and SLI configs for the 1080 Ti and 2080 Ti. You can see the latest results I got with DCSW 2.5.3 here:

 

https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=221380&page=11

 

(in post #105)

 

Overall, the 2080 Ti is about 30% faster in DCSW than the 1080 Ti and about 34% faster in VR (and even a little bit better if using a x299 motherboard and cpu). Hope this helps!

 

Awesome thank you! Exactly what I wanted to see! I'll definitely be upgrading to the 2080Ti. That's well worth the investment to get that large a performance bump IMO

AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | ASUS Crosshair Hero X670E | 64GB G Skill Trident Z DDR5 6000 | Nvidia RTX 4090 FE| Samsung EVO Plus 6 TB M.2 PCIe SSDs | TM Hornet Stick/WinWing Hornet Throttle and MIP | VPC T-50 Stick Base | TM TPR Rudder Pedals W/Damper | Varjo Aero/Pimax Crystal

VFA-25 Fist of the Fleet

Carrier Strike Group One(CSG-1) Discord
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excellent analysis, thanks a lot for sharing!

 

Besides the money, whether that 30 or 34% increase is sufficient for someone to go for the investment is probably also a question of where you start from. If you are getting say steady 70 or 80 fps with the 1080Ti with every setting maxed out, 30% more is probably not too appealing. But if your overall system gives you „only“ 20 or 30 fps even with a 1080Ti, you probably appreciate any additional frame (admittedly, if you get these numbers with a 1080Ti you probably have another probem in your setup).

 

Think about a regular car which only does 100km/h max. An increase in topspeed of 34% would be very noticeable and appreciated if you regularly do 6-7 hour journeys (like I do). If the topspeed of your car is 280 km/h...well, you would never be able to really benefit from a 34% increase. Not even on a German highway at night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He specifically states that they are with the Rift. See below from his #111 post. What I'm I missing?

 

In VR Settings, I set Pixel Density (PD) to 1.5

 

And with two runs on each card using the Oculus Rift, here is what I got (averaged with FRAPS):

 

1080 – 53.9 FPS – Averaged 5.2% CPU usage

 

1080 Ti – 72.1 FPS – Average 5.3% CPU usage

 

2080 Ti – 91.3 FPS – Averaged 5% CPU usage

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a mate of mine has just dropped 2 x 2080TI in his machine (He has also had to order a new PSU as a 850 watt wasn't powerful enough), using the rift he is still only getting 45 FPS, I think this is due to the rift software limiting the FPS.

 

I ran another test last night in Caucasus, I was getting an avg of 45 to 50 at low level, up high Angels 8+ I get 90+ ftp

 

I think if ED do use some of the new cores it will boost performance majorly but at this stage there is nothing that uses the new cores apart from a few games which are due for release.

 

I will probably order a card in the next few months though :)

Custom built W10 Pro 64Bit, Intel Core i9 9900k, Asus ROG Maximus Code XI Z390, 64GB DDR4 3200 RGB, Samsung 1TB NVme M.2 Drive, Gigabyte AORUS 2080TI, 40" Iiyama Display. Wacom Cintiq Pro 24, HOTAS Virpil T50 Stick / FA-18C TM Stick and Virpil T50 Throttle, MFG Crosswind Graphite Pedals. HP Reverb

 

SPECTER



[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Lead Terrain Developer / Texture Artist

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He specifically states that they are with the Rift. See below from his #111 post. What I'm I missing?

 

In VR Settings, I set Pixel Density (PD) to 1.5

 

And with two runs on each card using the Oculus Rift, here is what I got (averaged with FRAPS):

 

1080 – 53.9 FPS – Averaged 5.2% CPU usage

 

1080 Ti – 72.1 FPS – Average 5.3% CPU usage

 

2080 Ti – 91.3 FPS – Averaged 5% CPU usage

 

Sorry my mistake - his results don't make sense to be honest with that last run - compared to the earlier run with the Rift (with a different mobo & CPU), the 1080ti got more frames and the 2080ti got significantly less. You'd expect a shift in one direction not opposite directions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...