VEAO & Hawk discussion (please mind the forum rules) - Page 41 - ED Forums
 


Notices

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-23-2019, 12:22 PM   #401
Tuonato
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Italia, Milano
Posts: 20
Default

Sorry Shagrat, I suppose I am not able to explaine myself very well in english, I am not an haters, this is my second post in this thread, I lost my money, sometimes happens, what I mean is VEAO had the same problems that every 3rd parties and ED have in every module, why ED and other parties can give us beautiful and functional modules (not bug free but very funny to use) and VEAO not? Veao used 5 years to made a Hawk and they want to create EFA, maybe their ambitious outweighed their talent

Last edited by NineLine; 02-23-2019 at 05:33 PM. Reason: removed quote for OP
Tuonato is offline  
Old 02-23-2019, 02:20 PM   #402
erniedaoage
Member
 
erniedaoage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Vienna
Posts: 210
Default

The only thing which is missing in the whole statement is a simple:"We ****ed it up and we are sorry!"
They are like politicians who will never admit that they made a mistake.
__________________
Specs:WIN10, I7-4790K, ASUS RANGER VII, 16GB G.Skill DDR3, GEFORCE 1080, NVME SSD, SSD, TM T-16000 FCS FLIGHT PACK, MS FFB2, JETSEAT TURBOJET, DELAN CLIP FUSION

Modules:A10C, AJS-37, AV8B, BF109K4, CA, F/A18C, F14, F5EII, F86F, FC3, FW190A8, FW190D9, KA50, L39, M2000C, MI8TV2, MIG15BIS, MIG19P, MIG21BIS, P51D, SA342, SPITFIRE, UH1H, NORMANDY, PERSIAN GULF, CHANNEL, SYRIA

Thrustmaster TWCS Afterburner Detent
https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=223776
erniedaoage is offline  
Old 02-23-2019, 02:29 PM   #403
Infernal78
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 28
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by erniedaoage View Post
The only thing which is missing in the whole statement is a simple:"We ****ed it up and we are sorry!"
They are like politicians who will never admit that they made a mistake.

Yup.Classic damage control,don't take any responsibility and blame others...
Infernal78 is offline  
Old 02-23-2019, 03:10 PM   #404
Cdodders
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 56
Default

[IMG]via Imgflip Meme Generator[/IMG]
Cdodders is offline  
Old 02-23-2019, 03:46 PM   #405
norbot
Member
 
norbot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Germany
Posts: 905
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HC_Official View Post
looks like VAEO are still updating their website and trying to offer an explanation ??? http://veaosimulations.co.uk/ and by the way there are supposed to be air quotes around the explanation word above
"... Each and every one of us were heavily invested emotionally and with passion for the DCS community and we are all devastated to be leaving under such circumstances. ..."

Sorry guys, but if you compare what modders achieved with the A-4E and the MB-339 compared to the Hawk, you can only roll on the floor when reading the sentence above.
__________________
A-10C, AV-8B, F-5E, F-16C, F/A-18C, F-86F, Yak-52, Nevada, Persian Gulf, Supercarrier, Combined Arms, FW 190 A-8, FW 190 D-9, Spitfire LF Mk. IX, Normandy + WWII Assets Pack
norbot is offline  
Old 02-23-2019, 04:30 PM   #406
Flamin_Squirrel
Senior Member
 
Flamin_Squirrel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 2,451
Default

A well thought out argument. The problem is there are no redeeming qualities of the Hawk. They had more time than any other 3rd party to get things right, and their quality fell short in comparison in every respect. The SDK might be a good reason for bugs, but not for a crap flight model or terrible artwork.

If they'd done well in areas they had control over I'd have given them the benefit of the doubt, but they didn't. As such, it sounds like more excuses.

Last edited by NineLine; 02-23-2019 at 05:33 PM. Reason: removed quote for OP
Flamin_Squirrel is offline  
Old 02-23-2019, 06:17 PM   #407
Jumbik
Member
 
Jumbik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 587
Default

It's even plausible that the legal contract have changed because of them. ED had to protect their platform and customers and VEAO were the weak spot where the chain was breaking.
__________________
Do, or do not, there is no try.
--------------------------------------------------------
Sapphire Nitro+ Rx Vega 64, i7 4790K ... etc. etc.
Jumbik is offline  
Old 02-23-2019, 10:28 PM   #408
Paradox
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: The British Establishment
Posts: 886
Default

"This decision came at a critical time for us as we were on the verge of signing a new agreement with outsider investors for over £100,000 of investment to recruit a full-time studio to work solely on consumer products for DCS world. "

Sounds like a bullet dodged for everyone
Paradox is offline  
Old 02-24-2019, 08:26 AM   #409
klem
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 899
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jumbik View Post
It's even plausible that the legal contract have changed because of them. ED had to protect their platform and customers and VEAO were the weak spot where the chain was breaking.

Which would only ensure their departure. The real failure was in not securing the code/model which I hope the new agreement does for when other 3rd parties fail as one is bound to do at some time.
__________________
klem
56 RAF 'Firebirds'


ASUS ROG Strix Z390-F mobo, i7 8086A @ 5.0 GHz with Corsair H115i watercooling, Gigabyte 2080Ti GAMING OC 11Gb GPU , 32Gb DDR4 RAM, 500Gb and 256Gb SSD SATA III 6Gb/s + 2TB , Pimax 8k Plus VR, TM Warthog Throttle, TM F18 Grip on Virpil WarBRD base, Windows 10 Home 64bit
klem is offline  
Old 02-24-2019, 08:33 AM   #410
Satarosa
Senior Member
 
Satarosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,026
Default

close this VEAO section:

Licensed Third Party Projects » VEAO Simulations <--DELETE THIS


> VEAO is down.
> VEAO doesn't exist now..
> There is nothing constructive in this forum...
__________________
Real War, Youtube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCCs..._as=subscriber

Real War, Voice Chat: https://discord.gg/UGa3KMe


Last edited by Satarosa; 02-24-2019 at 08:37 AM.
Satarosa is offline  
Closed Thread

Tags
hawk disabled, hawk withdrawn, return my hawk

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:55 PM. vBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys. Powered by vBulletin®.
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.