David OC Posted May 25, 2018 Share Posted May 25, 2018 ROG-SWIFT-PG27UQ 4K 144Hz G-sync Quantum Dot IPS Little expensive!:cry: I would like to see someone try and get that thing to a constant 144 fps with DCS. Maxed out the settings yesterday in DCS Beta with the new settings SSAA 2.0, 4 x MSAA and hit 25 FPS LOL. Normally only run (max settings) with 2 x MSAA and was getting 70 - 100+ FPS. i7-7700K OC @ 5Ghz | ASUS IX Hero MB | ASUS GTX 1080 Ti STRIX | 32GB Corsair 3000Mhz | Corsair H100i V2 Radiator | Samsung 960 EVO M.2 NVMe 500G SSD | Samsung 850 EVO 500G SSD | Corsair HX850i Platinum 850W | Oculus Rift | ASUS PG278Q 27-inch, 2560 x 1440, G-SYNC, 144Hz, 1ms | VKB Gunfighter Pro Chuck's DCS Tutorial Library Download PDF Tutorial guides to help get up to speed with aircraft quickly and also great for taking a good look at the aircraft available for DCS before purchasing. Link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dell_Murrey-RUS Posted May 25, 2018 Share Posted May 25, 2018 4k with 144 Hz refresh rate for DCS? :D Unreal... DCS a simulator and 60 Hz refresh rate more than nice. But I don't understand why 4k with 27"? It's very low pixel and this greatly strains the eyesight. I'm used 26" with 1920*1200 and it was nice. 32" good with 1440 resolution. Now I'm use 40" iiyama X4071UHSU with 4k and GTX 1070. Have a stable 60 fps in DCS. My graphical DCS settings and nvidia drivers here in russian theme: https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3477485&postcount=535 With GTX 1080Ti you can use 4k resolution with max DCS settings and stable 60 fps. :) MB: MPG-Z390 GP / i7 9700KF 4,8 ГГц / DDR4 64 Gb 3466 МГц / GTX 2080Super / Acer 43" ET430KWMIIQPPX 4k / Win 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David OC Posted May 25, 2018 Author Share Posted May 25, 2018 There is a few discussions going on now about the visibility model. That 27 inch at 4K would not be good for DCS for spotting. I have the older ASUS PG278Q 144Hz @ 1440p and it's a good balance for speed and usability with flight simulation. I guess it would be good for first person shooters, you would still need a real good PC to push that along and make it a worthwhile purchase. i7-7700K OC @ 5Ghz | ASUS IX Hero MB | ASUS GTX 1080 Ti STRIX | 32GB Corsair 3000Mhz | Corsair H100i V2 Radiator | Samsung 960 EVO M.2 NVMe 500G SSD | Samsung 850 EVO 500G SSD | Corsair HX850i Platinum 850W | Oculus Rift | ASUS PG278Q 27-inch, 2560 x 1440, G-SYNC, 144Hz, 1ms | VKB Gunfighter Pro Chuck's DCS Tutorial Library Download PDF Tutorial guides to help get up to speed with aircraft quickly and also great for taking a good look at the aircraft available for DCS before purchasing. Link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BitMaster Posted May 25, 2018 Share Posted May 25, 2018 With GTX 1080Ti you can use 4k resolution with max DCS settings and stable 60 fps. :) Hmm, I have maxed out settings with SSAA-1.5x and gladly hit 70ish fps at WQHD. It's hard to believe a 1080ti can drive 4k to 60Hz stable at any spot on the map, regardless, when everything is maxed out. I hit the same low fps as David does, 25-28fps with SSAA2x...LoL but it looks so nice Gigabyte Aorus X570S Master - Ryzen 5900X - Gskill 64GB 3200/CL14@3600/CL14 - Asus 1080ti EK-waterblock - 4x Samsung 980Pro 1TB - 1x Samsung 870 Evo 1TB - 1x SanDisc 120GB SSD - Heatkiller IV - MoRa3-360LT@9x120mm Noctua F12 - Corsair AXi-1200 - TiR5-Pro - Warthog Hotas - Saitek Combat Pedals - Asus PG278Q 27" QHD Gsync 144Hz - Corsair K70 RGB Pro - Win11 Pro/Linux - Phanteks Evolv-X Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dell_Murrey-RUS Posted May 25, 2018 Share Posted May 25, 2018 Hmm, I have maxed out settings with SSAA-1.5x and gladly hit 70ish fps at WQHD. It's hard to believe a 1080ti can drive 4k to 60Hz stable at any spot on the map, regardless, when everything is maxed out. I hit the same low fps as David does, 25-28fps with SSAA2x...LoL but it looks so nice I have no any SSAA on me realese version 2.5. If that about beta, so it's a beta. Some bugs and other problem for beta - it's a normal. )))) "Maximum" settings non "extreme". And don't forget that the maps optimization continues. I make my tests and flights on the Caucasus map online server with some players and upload 4k video with fps indicator. SSAA very hard for PC. I don't use game AA. I like game AA off and drivers FXAA by 4x. On my 40" with 4k resolution very nice results - stable 60 fps with Vsync at 98% ot time. :) MB: MPG-Z390 GP / i7 9700KF 4,8 ГГц / DDR4 64 Gb 3466 МГц / GTX 2080Super / Acer 43" ET430KWMIIQPPX 4k / Win 10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
firmek Posted May 25, 2018 Share Posted May 25, 2018 I was like wow, what a beast, 4k, 144, G-Sync, IPS.... time to change my monitor. Then I noticed this: 27'' Seriously..... F/A-18, F-16, F-14, M-2000C, A-10C, AV-8B, AJS-37 Viggen, F-5E-3, F-86F, MiG-21bis, MiG-15bis, L-39 Albatros, C-101 Aviojet, P-51D, Spitfire LF Mk. IX, Bf 109 4-K, UH-1H, Mi-8, Ka-50, NTTR, Normandy, Persian Gulf... and not enough time to fully enjoy it all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
some1 Posted May 25, 2018 Share Posted May 25, 2018 You'll need to wait a bit more for something like nvidia bfgd. Or just find a decent TV. This monitor is mostly for pro gamers with deep pockets, smaller screen is better to see everything thats happening in the game at the same time, without swiveling your head like mad. Hardware: VPForce Rhino, FSSB R3 Ultra, Virpil T-50CM, Hotas Warthog, Winwing F15EX, Slaw Rudder, GVL224 Trio Throttle, Thrustmaster MFDs, Saitek Trim wheel, Trackir 5, Quest Pro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
remi Posted May 26, 2018 Share Posted May 26, 2018 I second the recommendation to wait for the BFGD. 4k = ideal destination 120+Hz = necessary 27" = too pixel dense for games or standard desktop use 65" = enough space to feel immersed in the game, and low enough pixel density up close that standard Windows scaling should be appropriate and work well for normal desktop uses like web browsing. In other words, if the screen had more pixels at 8k resolution, would 27" be reasonable? Would 8k @ 34" be reasonable? Probably not. I'm imagining this is the future: [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jctrnacty Posted May 26, 2018 Share Posted May 26, 2018 I must agree with firmek, 4k on 27 inches is a bad joke [sigpic][/sigpic] MB MSI x570 Prestige Creation, RYzen 9 3900X, 32 Gb Ram 3333MHz, cooler Dark rock PRO 4, eVGA 1080Ti, 32 inch BenQ 32011pt, saitek X52Pro, HP Reverb, win 10 64bit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts