English Electric Lightning - Page 2 - ED Forums
 


Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-02-2018, 05:50 PM   #11
joey45
Veteran
 
joey45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: West London UK
Posts: 10,059
Default

It's job was to get in the air and at altitude as fast as possible and shoot the missiles and land.

Not sure the early marks had a gun.
__________________
General 3D modeling thread and reference sites
new UK liveries for planes, ships and MODS.
The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance.
"Me, the 13th Duke of Wybourne, here on the ED forums at 3 'o' clock in the morning, with my reputation. Are they mad.."
Please send all hate mail to No11
V0.99 of my UK Yak-52 is now available in the user files..
joey45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2018, 06:02 PM   #12
Akatsuki
Member
 
Akatsuki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 556
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudel_chw View Post
I'd love to fly an F-104 on DCS: 60`s avionics, multirole, used by a lot of Countries, a natural oponent to the Mig-21 .... I'd purchase it on a heartbeat
Oh yes, the Starfighter would be a really nice addition to DCS.
Akatsuki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2018, 07:45 PM   #13
Basher54321
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 417
Default

In the late 1940s the RAF wanted a short range high climbing interceptor and it was also originally designed at a time when they were not sure if they would be getting an engine with Reheat (Afterburner) - that is why it was designed to fly Supersonic without afterburner (supercruise)

Speed was the priority thus stacking the engines reduced the frontal area for a very low drag design - however the fact the configuration was never seen again (AFAIK) would suggest it was too much of a compromise.

The belly tanks on the early versions could be jettisoned (IIRC)

RE above - the only single seat Lightning that didn't have internal guns was the F.mk3 - however they could replace the missiles with an internal 30mm gun pack if required.
Basher54321 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2018, 09:18 PM   #14
Saltat_cum_mortem
Member
 
Saltat_cum_mortem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 132
Default

Ah yes the only aircraft to be so ugly that even the air wouldn't take it.

Should it be in DCS? Sure. I just don't know that it's marketable.

Sent from my Moto Z2 Play using Tapatalk
__________________
Saltat_cum_mortem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2018, 09:31 PM   #15
firmek
Senior Member
 
firmek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,244
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Akatsuki View Post
Oh yes, the Starfighter would be a really nice addition to DCS.
Must have. F-104 should come with a "bribary" DLC as a early-access bonus
__________________
F/A-18, M-2000C, A-10C, AV-8B, AJS-37 Viggen, F-5E-3, F-86F, MiG-21bis, MiG-15bis, L-39 Albatros, C-101 Aviojet, P-51D, Spitfire LF Mk. IX, Bf 109 4-K, UH-1H, Mi-8, Ka-50, NTTR, Normandy, Persian Gulf... and not enough time to fully enjoy it all
firmek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2018, 10:02 PM   #16
ouPhrontis
Member
 
ouPhrontis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 457
Default

Some looked quite striking in polished aluminium alloy skin, though if some of the information about it is true, not sure I'd fly it in combat.
__________________
Fly In Peace, John Farley and may your skies remain forever CAVOK.
x2 X5675s | 72GB DDR3 ECC RAM 3 channel | GTX 1050Ti | 500GB SSD on PCIe lane | CH Products HOTAS | TrackIR5 | Win 7 64
ouPhrontis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2018, 10:06 PM   #17
frodrigues2016
Member
 
frodrigues2016's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Portugal
Posts: 188
Send a message via Yahoo to frodrigues2016
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joey45 View Post
Fast yes, superior......... no so much.

can you prove that on DCS.
__________________

---- " In Peace.....Prepare to War "--------
Wishlist : F-4 Phantom / F-20 TigerShark / Su-34
Processor Core i7 4790, 32 Gb RAM, 2 Tb SSHD, GTX 750 2Gb, 1920X1080 Gaming Monitor, Senze Joypad, Windows 8.1 Pro 64Bit, VMware Workstation 12 for WindowsXP with Office 2007 and Linux OpenSUSE for Net Access.
frodrigues2016 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2018, 10:09 PM   #18
streakeagle
Member
 
streakeagle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 625
Default

The Lightning certainly has some aerodynamic issues that make it a handful to fly, but to say that a Draken is comparable in performance (i.e. acceleration and climb) is not really a true statement. The Lightning could given an F-15 trouble in climb/acceleration. I don't ever remember seeing the Draken cited as being a world class climbing aircraft. I think of the Lighting as an F-104 with more power/weight and maneuverability, but less stability and a much less capable weapons/radar.

I would love to see the Draken (one of my all time favorite aircraft), the Lightning, and the F-104 in DCS World. To date, I have enjoyed all three aircraft in The SFP1/WoX/SF2 series games. But after a taste of the Viggen, I really want to see a DCS Draken. As a die-hard air-to-air virtual pilot, the Lightning and F-104 are extremely appealing, too. The problem is that DCS tends to pick one variant, usually the latest/best and will never get around to releasing other versions. Aircraft like the Lighting, F-104, and MiG-21 went through some radical revisions that really changes the way you fly/employ the aircraft in combat. The Lightning in particular was very hard to fly in its initial production form and was progressively improved. So it is nice to fly the different versions, especially the first and the last to contrast the refinement in flying qualities. The F-104A vs the F-104G wasn't as big a change, but still had some significant changes in stability and power-weight. The MiG-21F-13 is really quite a bit different from a MiG-21bis between increased weight, increased thrust, upgraded avionics/weapons, canopy changes, etc. I would love to fly every variant in between, too, especially the PF and PFMA.
__________________

Last edited by streakeagle; 07-02-2018 at 10:15 PM.
streakeagle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2018, 10:10 PM   #19
FubarBundy
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 110
Default

Ugly?... are you crazy?
well maybe with the external fuel tanks but clean, I think its beautiful!
FubarBundy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2018, 10:18 PM   #20
Pikey
Veteran
 
Pikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Reading, UK (GMT)
Posts: 3,125
Default

As a Brit, I can only say after the Spitfire our designs manage to throw up some of the ugliest flying machines ever. The Lightning isn't close to ugly in comparison to some.
Love to see it in DCS but this really was a proper old fashioned interceptor, a rocket, and I can't see the appeal of intercepting as a game, where much of it is a ground calculation for a narrow window and the weapons are probably less accurate than a modern Hydra.
Apparently it was interesting to fly.
__________________
“Six better fuses and we would have lost.”
Pikey is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:59 AM. vBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys. Powered by vBulletin®.
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.