Jump to content

Panavia Tornado by Polychop-Simulations?


phant

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 282
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I don't think there is another aircraft out there that excels the Tornado when it comes to low level flying :pilotfly:

 

SEPECAT Jaguar (and it can take-off/land on grass - can't get much lower than that!)

 

 

A Tornado would be very nice.


Edited by Brixmis

Kneeboard Guides

Rig: Asus B650-GAMING PLUS; Ryzen 7800X3D ; 64GB DDR5 5600; RTX 4080; VPC T50 CM2 HOTAS; SN-1 Pedals; VR = Pico 4 over VD Wireless + Index; Point Control v2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will be a customer of this product too.

Anything with a Rotary Wing is fun and challenging.

Use SRS radio.

Saitek X55 Modding

System Specs

 

Mixed Metals: i7 4790K@4.6, 32GB Kingston HyperX ram@2400Mhz, Gigabyte GA-Z97MX Gaming 5, ASUS Vega 64, 3xSamsung SSD drives, FSP Aurum 1000W PSU, Custom watercooling with EK blocks, Vive, Virpil MT 50, X55 throttle.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would pre order it for sure.

My guess is, that it would sell to the not so small British and the German communities in larger numbers.

 

Don't forget the italian (and saudi?) community members! :D


Edited by QuiGon

Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit

 

DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!

 

Tornado3 small.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like the ECR version the most. The Su25T is the only aircraft capable of doing the SEAD role. Some more options for SEAD and a Agm-88 Harm platform would be very welcome. Another air to ground version would be nice as well. The ADF version I will not buy.

g8PjVMw.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think there is another aircraft out there that excels the Tornado when it comes to low level flying :pilotfly:

 

Mirage 2000N/D ;)

 

So fast in low-level penetration that it's a pain to plan COMAO's with other NATO mudmovers, because they can't follow :D


Edited by Moos_tachu

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Mud, wind and fire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well about low and moving mud, the tornados were supposed to get new engines. I can not tell which, cause I remember it was some sort of classified or not really, but there were plannings to exchnage the engines and get new once which are in use with a different plane at the moment. the increase of power would have been like the followed stated.

the old full ab thrust would have been equal to the dry trust of the new engines. now imagine the full ab of the new engines, plus the tornado would stand the structural stress.

I guess no plane would match that in low level ever but in the end politicians thought it was to expensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well about low and moving mud, the tornados were supposed to get new engines. I can not tell which, cause I remember it was some sort of classified or not really, but there were plannings to exchnage the engines and get new once which are in use with a different plane at the moment. the increase of power would have been like the followed stated.

the old full ab thrust would have been equal to the dry trust of the new engines..

 

Hm, the only western engines with ~77kn dry thrust are the latest versions of the F100 and F110 which are about 1.5m longer than the RB199...

So I guess they were talking about the still theoretical EJ200 upgrade @80/120kn (which is a public proposal from Eurojet.)

 

^Not even sure if the Typhoon user forces want this, since it increases fuel consumption. French posters have said the French AF turned down a 75 to 90kn engine upgrade for the Rafale, for that reason.

The USN has also turned down a 100 to 110 or 120kn upgrade of the F414.


Edited by emg
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like the ECR version the most. The Su25T is the only aircraft capable of doing the SEAD role. Some more options for SEAD and a Agm-88 Harm platform would be very welcome. Another air to ground version would be nice as well. The ADF version I will not buy.

 

The IDS-Version is also capable of using HARMs (or ALARMs in case of the RAF). it just doesn't has the dedicated EW-equipment of the ECR-Tornado which can precisely locate, identify, analyze and jam enemy SAMs. The RAF did exactly that. They used the IDS-variant for SEAD with their ALARMs instead of acquiring the specialised ECR-Variant.

 

I don't think the ECR-Tornado would be of much use in DCS, because EW isn't really simulated in DCS, so it could not make use of it's capabilities besides shooting HARMs which the IDS can do as well.

Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit

 

DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!

 

Tornado3 small.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would think the Buccaneer would be the best at low level.

 

Why? The Buccaneer can't fly supersonic at low level if at all. I think it's navigation systems are inferior to the Tornado. I mean there is a reason why the Tornado replaced the Buccaneer ;)

Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit

 

DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!

 

Tornado3 small.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...