J-11B with PL12 - Page 4 - ED Forums
 


Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-15-2020, 03:16 PM   #31
AeriaGloria
Veteran
 
AeriaGloria's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: LA
Posts: 3,285
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by musolo View Post
Well. Good enough for me.Can they do it? They can. Your "unrealistic" mantra doesn`t change that or makes it less possible. After all it`s not about what actually happened. It`s about what potentially could happen. You are against that i get it. You just don`t want this to happen. To have fun with what others consider plausible scenario. And if those jets will be renamed to their respective PL12 carrying variants then it will be even more fun to fly them and splash them.
I never intended to insult anybody. Phrase "You are a poison, not a medicine" is not i insult it`s a metaphore that describes the negative outcome of such attitude. You`re too stiff to have fun with it i guess.
There is a huge difference between modifying a plane you built yourself with your own avionics with no license agreement, and building a plane under a license agreement. I think you under estimate how strict license agreements are.

What happened when India was disappointed with R-77 range after balakot strikes and asked Russia if they could add I-derby to plane built in India? Surprise surprise Russia said no, and then promptly sold them hundreds of Russian made missiles.

If license agreements were not limiting, they would be no reason to make a J-11B or J-15 with all indigenous equipment. So basically just becuase J-15 and J-11B exist, does not mean they could do the same to J-11A, where they are restricted by a license agreement and the fact that it’s all Russian avionics doesn’t even use the same data bus as Chinese missiles and equipment(MIL STD 1760), and even if it did have the right data bus there’s no getting past the limit of avionics from another country.

So what have they proven to dowith J-11A when it comes to modifications? They have added R-77 and MFI-55, two pieces of RUSSIAN equipment. Unless you can find a photo or any other evidence other then “can they do it? Sure they can. Good enough for me,” then that is the only two examples of J-11A being modified and with only Russian equipment!

So sorry, realism still applies. The existence of J-11B and J-15 does not make the restrictions of license built J-11A disappear. Proof of those two planes does not make it true for the other.

In addition, just becuase they “can” with J-11B and J-15, does not mean they could turn a J-11A into a J-11B or J-15. Replacing all the avionics, radios, radar, data buses, you might as well build a new plane. Which is exactly what they did, build a new plane without a license agreement, a plane that is not J-11A, but literally only shares the same basic airframe, with even cockpits being entirely different.

So yes these limitations are realistic, but if you have a photo or an article that says otherwise of course we would be open to it. But just looking at articles on J-11B or the wiki of J-15 is not going to convince anyone the same thing is possible with J-11A. Otherwise they wouldn’t have built a new plane with entirely different insides and called it J-11B, would they?

So please, we are not attacking your server or the fun you have on it, just defending the very good reasons it’s not that way in game, reasons that are 99% likely to never change since I don’t think they even operate J-11A anymore!!

I have written more then I intended, but basically I’m going to try and stop convincing you. If you can’t believe that license agreements and avionics have specific restrictions and choose to believe they can do same thing as J-11B or J-15 to J-11A, then I don’t think any of us here will be able to convince you.

No one blames you for enjoying a what if server, but you won’t go far by saying we are “too stiff to have fun with it” and trying to convince us the game should be a “what if” for everyone who fights J-11A. It’s a mod, no harm in enjoying it, and while I won’t try to put down the fun you have in it, I hope you realize how counter productive it is to also say we should not have fun with realism, no one decides the fun of another person. But I know if I’m playing on a MP PVP sever on vanilla install we probably share a love of realism to some degree, and if we want to mod for “what if” we can, but I would never ever call them out for not enjoying fun just becuase they don’t enjoy realism as much as me. No one decides the fun of another, and I hope you realize that us that are opposed to J-11A having PL-12 in regular game install for everyone on the basis of realism, is not becuase we do not enjoy fun, or are too stiff, or that we “don’t get it.” We are just playing by the same rules all the other modules have.

If there’s actual evidence other then Wikipedia entries for J-11B and J-15, we will be open to it, but things aren’t going to change unless there is evidence for J-11A specifically. And to be honest, I trust Deka on this even if I hadn’t been doing years and years of research on Chinese and Russian planes becuase I love them. As far as I can tell R-77 and MFI-55 Is only additions for J-11A, and I only know about those becuase of Deka in the first place, I think they have the most knowledge to say one way or the other, and they have made it clear it never got Chinese missiles, and J-11b is required for indigenous weapons. So if you don’t want to trust me or Dundun, you can trust Deka

Last edited by AeriaGloria; 09-15-2020 at 03:28 PM.
AeriaGloria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2020, 04:14 PM   #32
musolo
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 66
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AeriaGloria View Post
There is a huge difference between modifying a plane you built yourself with your own avionics with no license agreement, and building a plane under a license agreement. I think you under estimate how strict license agreements are.

What happened when India was disappointed with R-77 range after balakot strikes and asked Russia if they could add I-derby to plane built in India? Surprise surprise Russia said no, and then promptly sold them hundreds of Russian made missiles.

If license agreements were not limiting, they would be no reason to make a J-11B or J-15 with all indigenous equipment. So basically just becuase J-15 and J-11B exist, does not mean they could do the same to J-11A, where they are restricted by a license agreement and the fact that it’s all Russian avionics doesn’t even use the same data bus as Chinese missiles and equipment(MIL STD 1760), and even if it did have the right data bus there’s no getting past the limit of avionics from another country.

So what have they proven to dowith J-11A when it comes to modifications? They have added R-77 and MFI-55, two pieces of RUSSIAN equipment. Unless you can find a photo or any other evidence other then “can they do it? Sure they can. Good enough for me,” then that is the only two examples of J-11A being modified and with only Russian equipment!

So sorry, realism still applies. The existence of J-11B and J-15 does not make the restrictions of license built J-11A disappear. Proof of those two planes does not make it true for the other.

In addition, just becuase they “can” with J-11B and J-15, does not mean they could turn a J-11A into a J-11B or J-15. Replacing all the avionics, radios, radar, data buses, you might as well build a new plane. Which is exactly what they did, build a new plane without a license agreement, a plane that is not J-11A, but literally only shares the same basic airframe, with even cockpits being entirely different.

So yes these limitations are realistic, but if you have a photo or an article that says otherwise of course we would be open to it. But just looking at articles on J-11B or the wiki of J-15 is not going to convince anyone the same thing is possible with J-11A. Otherwise they wouldn’t have built a new plane with entirely different insides and called it J-11B, would they?

So please, we are not attacking your server or the fun you have on it, just defending the very good reasons it’s not that way in game, reasons that are 99% likely to never change since I don’t think they even operate J-11A anymore!!

I have written more then I intended, but basically I’m going to try and stop convincing you. If you can’t believe that license agreements and avionics have specific restrictions and choose to believe they can do same thing as J-11B or J-15 to J-11A, then I don’t think any of us here will be able to convince you.

No one blames you for enjoying a what if server, but you won’t go far by saying we are “too stiff to have fun with it” and trying to convince us the game should be a “what if” for everyone who fights J-11A. It’s a mod, no harm in enjoying it, and while I won’t try to put down the fun you have in it, I hope you realize how counter productive it is to also say we should not have fun with realism, no one decides the fun of another person. But I know if I’m playing on a MP PVP sever on vanilla install we probably share a love of realism to some degree, and if we want to mod for “what if” we can, but I would never ever call them out for not enjoying fun just becuase they don’t enjoy realism as much as me. No one decides the fun of another, and I hope you realize that us that are opposed to J-11A having PL-12 in regular game install for everyone on the basis of realism, is not becuase we do not enjoy fun, or are too stiff, or that we “don’t get it.” We are just playing by the same rules all the other modules have.

If there’s actual evidence other then Wikipedia entries for J-11B and J-15, we will be open to it, but things aren’t going to change unless there is evidence for J-11A specifically. And to be honest, I trust Deka on this even if I hadn’t been doing years and years of research on Chinese and Russian planes becuase I love them. As far as I can tell R-77 and MFI-55 Is only additions for J-11A, and I only know about those becuase of Deka in the first place, I think they have the most knowledge to say one way or the other, and they have made it clear it never got Chinese missiles, and J-11b is required for indigenous weapons. So if you don’t want to trust me or Dundun, you can trust Deka
Again it`s a fictional scenario where Sino-Russian military cooperation reached new level in formed alliance agaist NATO and those mutual upgrades both for Chinese Air defence systems and Russian air to air capabilities. And we all know how fast all those license limitations and bureaucratic obstacles get overriten in a matter of days when it comes to matters of state survival. Are there techicalities to that? Ofcourse. Is it doable in those circumstances? Ofcourse it is. Again as a FICTIONAL scenario it makes perfect sence))) Take it easy) Cheers!

Last edited by musolo; 09-15-2020 at 04:23 PM.
musolo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2020, 04:31 PM   #33
AeriaGloria
Veteran
 
AeriaGloria's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: LA
Posts: 3,285
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by musolo View Post
Again it`s a fictional scenario where Sino-Russian military cooperation reached new level in formed alliance agaist NATO and those mutual upgrades both for Chinese Air defence systems and Russian air to air capabilities. And we all know how fast all those license limitations and bureaucratic obstacles get overriten in a matter of days when it comes to matters of state survival. Are there techicalities to that? Ofcourse. Is it doable in those circumstances? Ofcourse it is. Again as a FICTIONAL scenario it makes perfect sence))) Take it easy) Cheers!
Yeah that’s fine for that modded server, not one single post in this thread is stating it’s wrong for you to enjoy that server. It’s a good use of modding to create said situation.

All we are saying is, since you also keep saying that such a mod to be enabled in the base game for everyone in every server because you believe it realistic for J-11A, to quote what Snoopy Said in an A-10 thread, all we are saying is “I’ll leave that unrealistic request to you then.”

Last edited by AeriaGloria; 09-15-2020 at 04:34 PM.
AeriaGloria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2020, 05:04 PM   #34
musolo
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 66
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AeriaGloria View Post
Yeah that’s fine for that modded server, not one single post in this thread is stating it’s wrong for you to enjoy that server. It’s a good use of modding to create said situation.

All we are saying is, since you also keep saying that such a mod to be enabled in the base game for everyone in every server because you believe it realistic for J-11A, to quote what Snoopy Said in an A-10 thread, all we are saying is “I’ll leave that unrealistic request to you then.”
You got me wrong man. I said that ability to modify stuff on server side and stay IC clean should be implemented. To have controll from server side on what can and can`t be used there. That would be great thing to have and would allow for more servers with cool mods implemented whithout turning that kind of server into sandbox. Wright now IC option either on or off with no extra options available to modify server in a controlled predictable manner.

Last edited by musolo; 09-15-2020 at 05:18 PM.
musolo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2020, 05:56 PM   #35
dundun92
Member
 
dundun92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 471
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by musolo View Post
You got me wrong man. I said that ability to modify stuff on server side and stay IC clean should be implemented. To have controll from server side on what can and can`t be used there. That would be great thing to have and would allow for more servers with cool mods implemented whithout turning that kind of server into sandbox. Wright now IC option either on or off with no extra options available to modify server in a controlled predictable manner.
If thats what youve been asking for I 100% agree, server owners should be able to determine what does and does not pass IC, that wasnt what we were arguing.
__________________
Eagle Enthusiast, Fresco Fan. Patiently waiting for the F-15E. Clicky F-15C when?
HP Z400 Workstation
Intel Xeon W3680(i7-980X) OC'd to 4.0 GHz, EVGA GTX 1060 6GB SSC Gaming, 12 GB DDR3 RAM, 500GB Crucial MX500 SSD. Thrustmaster T16000M FCS HOTAS, DIY opentrack head-tracking. I upload DCS videos here https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0-...J-QUX5M7Dh1pGg

The Alamo Squadron is looking for dedicated Air-to-Air focused pilots
For more detailed recruiting information, see our forums.
dundun92 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2020, 08:59 PM   #36
musolo
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 66
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dundun92 View Post
If thats what youve been asking for I 100% agree, server owners should be able to determine what does and does not pass IC, that wasnt what we were arguing.
Luckily this mod keeps server IC protected. So that PL12/SD10 on Russian and Chinese planes is the only thing implemented there. Hopefully it will be possible to modify messaging system soon so that it would allow For J11B and J15 names in kill feeds among other places. Not to break immersion)
Since we`re not ever getting those jets from "factory" we might as well have fun with diy mockups of them.
musolo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2020, 12:23 PM   #37
VC
Member
 
VC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 606
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by musolo View Post
Since we`re not ever getting those jets from "factory" we might as well have fun with diy mockups of them.
I agree with having fun with DIY mock-ups, to see for example what Flanker aerodynamics can achieve combined with a competitive Fox 3. But for me the experience of flying low fidelity modules is becoming more frustrating. Adding very powerful weapons just highlights the other issues even more: useless radar detection ranges, made even worse by jamming, clunky controls, no usable TWS or even SAM style mode, lack of fine controls and low immersion due to fidelity. It's a real shame but the mod is not really a solution for me.
__________________
VC

=X51= Squadron is recruiting!
X51 website: https://x51squadron.com/
Join our Discord: https://discord.gg/d9JtFY4
VC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2020, 01:17 PM   #38
musolo
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 66
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VC View Post
I agree with having fun with DIY mock-ups, to see for example what Flanker aerodynamics can achieve combined with a competitive Fox 3. But for me the experience of flying low fidelity modules is becoming more frustrating. Adding very powerful weapons just highlights the other issues even more: useless radar detection ranges, made even worse by jamming, clunky controls, no usable TWS or even SAM style mode, lack of fine controls and low immersion due to fidelity. It's a real shame but the mod is not really a solution for me.
I tested SU33 and SU27with hot A10A target at 2 km coaltitude.
their own N-001 radar detects it at130 km and locks at 115 km
SU30s N-011M radar detects at 100km and locks at 93 km
JF-17s KLJ - 7 radar detects at 136km and locks at 118km
Mig29S N-019M radar detects at 88 km and locks at 76 km
musolo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2020, 01:21 PM   #39
ZHeN
Veteran
 
ZHeN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Russia
Posts: 6,185
Default

Su-30 in DCS is fitted with N-001
__________________
ZHeN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2020, 02:43 PM   #40
musolo
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 66
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZHeN View Post
Su-30 in DCS is fitted with N-001
I`m talking about AI plane. Check for yourself. You`ll see it.
musolo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:50 PM. vBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys. Powered by vBulletin®.
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.