Ракеты в DCS - Page 708 - ED Forums
 


Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-08-2019, 01:10 PM   #7071
Glimmer
Senior Member
 
Glimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Posts: 1,596
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Маэстро View Post
Там речь была совсем о другом. Переменный коэффициент навигации по относительной дальности никакого отношения к фм не имеет.
А когда меняли непосредственно ФМ, не напомните? И для каких моделей каких ракет.
__________________
VF-84 | TAW_Glimmer

F-14 Tomcat | Су-27С/СМ Flanker | F/A-18C Hornet | МиГ-29 Fulcrum | F-16C Viper | Су-25 Frogfoot | M-2000C/D/N/5 Mirage | Су-24М Fencer | F-4E Phantom II | МиГ-31Б Foxhound
Glimmer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2019, 01:37 PM   #7072
Chizh
ED Producer
 
Chizh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Москва
Posts: 54,722
Default

Пока сделано на новой ФМ семейство AIM-7.
__________________
Я не смотрю телевизор
ЧИЖ

Вакансии в ED

Flying Legend 2018 : Imperial War Museum 2018 : Армия 2019 - Кубинка
Chizh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2019, 01:40 PM   #7073
Glimmer
Senior Member
 
Glimmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
Posts: 1,596
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chizh View Post
Пока сделано на новой ФМ семейство AIM-7.
AIM-7E / AIM-7F / AIM-7M / AIM-7MH ??? Все?

P.S: На работе пока не могу вспомнить, у нас есть еще другие модели.
__________________
VF-84 | TAW_Glimmer

F-14 Tomcat | Су-27С/СМ Flanker | F/A-18C Hornet | МиГ-29 Fulcrum | F-16C Viper | Су-25 Frogfoot | M-2000C/D/N/5 Mirage | Су-24М Fencer | F-4E Phantom II | МиГ-31Б Foxhound
Glimmer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2019, 01:45 PM   #7074
Chizh
ED Producer
 
Chizh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Москва
Posts: 54,722
Default

Да, эти.
__________________
Я не смотрю телевизор
ЧИЖ

Вакансии в ED

Flying Legend 2018 : Imperial War Museum 2018 : Армия 2019 - Кубинка
Chizh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2019, 02:08 PM   #7075
Teknetinium
Senior Member
 
Teknetinium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,578
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chizh View Post
What problem?
Is you mean chaff screen - yes.


Probably yes.
Why are aim-120 C/B not effected by chaff as much then, you have to be 90 degrees and pop all chaff you have to miss, AIM-120C is even worse you need to be below 500km/h, I feel AIM-120 are slightly to good in chaff rejection if you compare to Su-27 radar, as well as it is not making DCS less realistic if aim-120 go for chaff by more%
Teknetinium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2019, 02:14 PM   #7076
GGTharos
Veteran
 
GGTharos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 30,286
Default

Like your phone today is more powerful than the 386 you once had, the AIM-120s processing capability is that much better than the N001. Not sure what you 'feeling' anything has to do with it.
__________________

Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump
I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
GGTharos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2019, 02:15 PM   #7077
Teknetinium
Senior Member
 
Teknetinium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,578
Default

Can you explain how and why aim-120B/C have better chaff rejections them su-27? Chiz?

Last edited by Teknetinium; 11-08-2019 at 02:20 PM.
Teknetinium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2019, 02:16 PM   #7078
Teknetinium
Senior Member
 
Teknetinium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,578
Default

We are talking power output, not only processor. Thats why I say, you take all the positives but disregard the negatives, and on Su-27 point out only negatives.

Last edited by Teknetinium; 11-08-2019 at 02:18 PM.
Teknetinium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2019, 02:18 PM   #7079
GGTharos
Veteran
 
GGTharos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 30,286
Default

Superior digital processing, MPRF operation when in terminal homing, path shaping to help keep chaff out-of-sight.


What makes you think the Su-27 would reject chaff better than the AIM-120? That radar is 10 years behind the original APG-63, and over 20 years behind in technology compared to the AIM-120. Can you explain how the Su-27 could possibly be better at chaff rejection than an AIM-120?


Power output is irrelevant. Noise ratio is relevant. You talk about power output without understanding at all how it works. Who cares - SAMs would literally defeat everything in the world if it was about power output.
__________________

Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump
I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
GGTharos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2019, 02:21 PM   #7080
Teknetinium
Senior Member
 
Teknetinium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,578
Default

You could go to space if all was about processors, but its not! For your knowledge GG, ER-27 and ET had updates as well!

Last edited by Teknetinium; 11-08-2019 at 02:32 PM.
Teknetinium is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19 PM. vBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys. Powered by vBulletin®.
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.