JF17 loadouts

we are implementing the engine surge due to missile smoke

once it's done, we will consider modification of loadout (not guaranteed changes)

Praise DEKA!

:thumbup:

:pilotfly:

we are implementing the engine surge due to missile smoke

once it's done, we will consider modification of loadout (not guaranteed changes)

Does this mean due to smoke from rocket motors fired from the inboard pylons, which currently is not possible, or would this also affect missiles from the outer ones?

ALL HAIL DEKA! :D

Yeah leave it to me to avoid my launch smoke and give me 8 SD10 XD

If you forget to loft and your target is Straight in front of you..... :megalol:

Makes me wonder about the gun. I always thought it’s downward placement had more to do with inconvenient place it is, or perhaps interfering with passive bleed system(I will keep asking if the outlets are the outside of the intakes until I know!), it might be the default .5 second cut off is there not just for over heating and ammo conservation.

I'll deal with the surges! This is promising news thanks Uboats. Fingers crossed.

If you forget to loft and your target is Straight in front of you..... :megalol:

I never forget to loft ESPECIALLY when target is straight in front of me

If you forget to loft and your target is Straight in front of you..... :megalol:

 

Makes me wonder about the gun. I always thought it’s downward placement had more to do with inconvenient place it is, or perhaps interfering with passive bleed system(I will keep asking if the outlets are the outside of the intakes until I know!), it might be the default .5 second cut off is there not just for over heating and ammo conservation.

Passive bleed system is on the inside of the inlet against the fuselage.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/296739241_Design_of_Bump_inlet_of_thunderJF-17_aircraft

I have read that paper, however it does not specify the inlet and outlet. There has to be an inlet and outlet with less pressure to draw air through, it makes sense that the grid holes on the DSI bump are the inlet and the grid holes on the outside of the intake are the outlet, as there would be little reason to drain boundary layer air after it has passed the intake lip. In addition the holes on the side of the intake are larger, which would create lower pressure then the inlet holes, and passively draw low pressure air through them

we are implementing the engine surge due to missile smoke

once it's done, we will consider modification of loadout (not guaranteed changes)

Ok.

Can we get any information, if Mk.20 Rockeye cluster bombs and Mk.82 Snakeeye high drag bombs will get implemented for the inner pylons?

Can we get any information, if Mk.20 Rockeye cluster bombs and Mk.82 Snakeeye high drag bombs will get implemented for the inner pylons?

And if rockets for inner pylons?

And if rockets for inner pylons?

+1000000000000000000000000

And if rockets for inner pylons?

This, plus dual-rack 250kg-class bombs (82L/SE/AIR/GBU, Mk20, Type-200), and possibly low smoke yield missiles like the C-701s and PL-5. (Maybe single SD-10/LD-10 too?)

Oh, and a Centerline C-802AK, plus all bombs.

This, plus dual-rack 250kg-class bombs (82L/SE/AIR/GBU, Mk20, Type-200)

I believe Deka already mentioned earlier in this thread that they have never seen dual racks on the inner pylons before so it will not be added.

Any formal answer on this yet?

https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=4401406&postcount=2

considering is not an answer though. looking for something a bit more sure than it is under consideration

whats the difference between the type 200 and 200 dual?

whats the difference between the type 200 and 200 dual?

You don't have to ask the same question in 3 different threads

i didnt realize you were a moderator

i didnt realize you were a moderator

Now you know, and knowing is half the battle. The other half is not being a douchebag.