Jump to content

Mission designer option for Navigation map to HDD of MiG-29


discwalker

Mission designer option for Navigation map to HDD of MiG-29  

46 members have voted

  1. 1. Mission designer option for Navigation map to HDD of MiG-29

    • Yes, of course, let designer choose that
      20
    • I'm neutral
      1
    • No, I want block this wish
      25


Recommended Posts

I suspect many of us used a lot the MiG-29 navigation function on the head dow display since LOMAC. Waypoints and Runways was nicely visualized.

ED almost 2 years ago removed waypoint knowing ability on MiG-29, without a notice, what a deprivation!

(https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=160270

https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=171212

https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=158228)

We have only a fresh promise to add Su-25T kind of functionality once:

https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3652885&postcount=13

Wags:"It will be added back to the HUD in an update."

 

But the simple moving map was better.

Visual alternate airport selection capability is handy.

Navigating with that in bad weather is priceless, especially think to approach.

The feature is thankfully working in Flankers (Su-27, Su-33, J-11A)

(in key "1" NAV mode, HUD repeater mode off state)

GTX 1070 8GB, 16GB DDR3, W8.1 on SSD, DCS on another SSD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

The HDD on the MiG-29A/B/S is only a HUD repeater. It does not have the same function as the HDD in the Su-27 and therefore should only be a HUD repeater in the game.

System Spec: Cooler Master Cosmos C700P Black Edition case. | AMD 5950X CPU | MSI RTX-3090 GPU | 32GB HyperX Predator PC4000 RAM | | TM Warthog stick & throttle | TrackIR 5 | Samsung 980 Pro NVMe 4 SSD 1TB (boot) | Samsung 870 QVO SSD 4TB (games) | Windows 10 Pro 64-bit.

 

Personal wish list: DCS: Su-27SM & DCS: Avro Vulcan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing is, removing the number is valid since the real one doesn't have it, but that also implies that the nav panel must be implemented (already similar in FC Su-25A, also the animation is already there in the model) to provide the correct indication.

 

Leaving this halfway only leaves people hanging without proper indication.

-------

All the people keep asking for capabilities to be modelled.... I want the limitations to be modelled.... limitations make for realistic simulation.

Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in the mud, after a bit you realize the pig likes it.

 

Long time ago in galaxy far far away:

https://www.deviantart.com/alfafox/gallery

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...