BlackPixxel Posted August 20, 2019 Share Posted August 20, 2019 It is sad to read that there is no interest of ED to do easy improvements for the FC3-modules. They still cost money, and you still pay 1/4th of a full fidelity module. But most of them share the same systems, so it is just copy and paste for ED. A little more effort by ED would be very appreciated (these improvements + plane to plane datalink for example) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tempest Posted September 1, 2019 Share Posted September 1, 2019 Nice informative, forum string. Guess I will hold off purchase. :( Thanks all for your observations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOViper Posted September 1, 2019 Share Posted September 1, 2019 for ED Just as information for ED: The developers did a superb job on the MiG-29 so far, really! I am having this idea since months: I would pay another 50 bucks if they somehow start pulling it out of FC into a fully scaled fully clickable DCS module, like others. The FC version can exist in parallel of course. I assume they would have many things already finished/coded, the outstanding 3D-model, the FM, some avionics, some this and thats. Why not doing this step? I want to be the first customer :) Visit https://www.viggen.training ...Viggen... what more can you ask for? my computer: AMD Ryzen 5600G | NVIDIA GTX 1080 Ti OC 11GB | 32 GB 3200 MHz DDR4 DUAL | SSD 980 256 GB SYS + SSD 2TB DCS | TM Warthog Stick + Throttle + TPR | Rift CV1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FoxAlfa Posted September 1, 2019 Author Share Posted September 1, 2019 (edited) Nice informative, forum string. Guess I will hold off purchase. :( Thanks all for your observations. Tempest, don't get this tread wrong... the Fulcrum PFM is excellent now (with the right curves) and I can't recommend it enough... I spent over 100 hours and got around 200 kills in it on the Blue Flag and loved every single minute of it... this small things are more comfort of life things then any deal beakers... Edited September 1, 2019 by FoxAlfa ------- All the people keep asking for capabilities to be modelled.... I want the limitations to be modelled.... limitations make for realistic simulation. Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in the mud, after a bit you realize the pig likes it. Long time ago in galaxy far far away: https://www.deviantart.com/alfafox/gallery Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harlikwin Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 Just as information for ED: The developers did a superb job on the MiG-29 so far, really! I am having this idea since months: I would pay another 50 bucks if they somehow start pulling it out of FC into a fully scaled fully clickable DCS module, like others. The FC version can exist in parallel of course. I assume they would have many things already finished/coded, the outstanding 3D-model, the FM, some avionics, some this and thats. Why not doing this step? I want to be the first customer :) Politics mostly. I'd love to see a Full Fi F15C or A10A, which at least avoids the modern red air problem. Interesting that Chiz hinted at Full Fi mig29 though. New hotness: I7 9700k 4.8ghz, 32gb ddr4, 2080ti, :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, HP Reverb (formermly CV1) Old-N-busted: i7 4720HQ ~3.5GHZ, +32GB DDR3 + Nvidia GTX980m (4GB VRAM) :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, Rift CV1 (yes really). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pepin1234 Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 (edited) The aircraft still have a lot of tricky new features that is not supposed to be like that. It is FC3... all right, understood that, but what about all the realistic flight models for F-15? All the simulation that bring high difficulty drive level is coming for Russian fighters in FC3. While F-15 still keep with high maneuvers with wigs fuel tanks. Making Turns that nobody know if that amount of Gs shown in the information bar is showing the thrust. While the new Mig-29 PFM is a nightmare in trimming setup. After every single high Gs maneuvers we can’t counter attack without before trimming the whole aircraft. Still we keep jumping 10 meters high after make a slight mistake in landing... I personally use more Mig-29 than any other aircraft in DCS and is the aircraft with more accidents in landing after the new PFM. (Mig-21, Mig-19, Mig-15, Su-27 no problem at all, in Mig-29 a tiny mistake is a 10-15 meter bounce to secure you died in the try. This RWR is just a mess, They fixed it for a while and brought the RWR bug back again... like something was too good and should be broken back. I fly Mig-29 more than Su-27 and I know what I am talking about. Mig-29 have a lot of new features that make you think twice if this is a serious simulation, even more if you look to F-15 that is in the same FC3 improvements, as PFM or whatever they want to make you believe. At end of the day is like Mig-29 should remain so because someone like it so. Edited September 3, 2019 by pepin1234 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid18120 Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 Maybe some interesting "ports" from FC-form to FF-form might come after MAC releases. IIRC they are pulling FF modules and limiting them to fit in MAC-form, so they might as well be developing the needed underlying structure for the opposite to happen. Only time can tell for sure though. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Simming since 2005 My Rig: Gigabyte X470 Aorus Ultra Gaming, AMD Ryzen7 2700X, G.Skill RipJaws 32GB DDR4-3200, EVGA RTX 2070 Super Black Gaming, Corsair HX850 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FoxAlfa Posted September 11, 2019 Author Share Posted September 11, 2019 I would also add as 9. the top part of the hud needs to be lighter and much more see trough. Many times I wasn't able to pick up the target since the HUD is way too dark. Real hud: DCS hud: ------- All the people keep asking for capabilities to be modelled.... I want the limitations to be modelled.... limitations make for realistic simulation. Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in the mud, after a bit you realize the pig likes it. Long time ago in galaxy far far away: https://www.deviantart.com/alfafox/gallery Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
draconus Posted September 11, 2019 Share Posted September 11, 2019 (edited) Real hud: It's different version than you show. Edited September 11, 2019 by draconus Win10 i7-10700KF 32GB RTX3060 Rift S T16000M TWCS TFRP FC3 F-14A/B F-15E CA SC NTTR PG Syria Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FoxAlfa Posted September 11, 2019 Author Share Posted September 11, 2019 It's different version than you show. It's not a different version, its the different angle. The camera is well above head, so light is staying longer in the tinted glass thus making it darker. Similar effect to the angled armor and the round going trough it. And even if you compere it from that angle the one from the videos are still lighter then in the DCS. Its a small tweak but a very needed one. ------- All the people keep asking for capabilities to be modelled.... I want the limitations to be modelled.... limitations make for realistic simulation. Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in the mud, after a bit you realize the pig likes it. Long time ago in galaxy far far away: https://www.deviantart.com/alfafox/gallery Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krippz Posted September 12, 2019 Share Posted September 12, 2019 +1 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] 64th "Scorpions" Aggressor Squadron Discord: 64th Aggressor Squadron TS: 195.201.110.22 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
draconus Posted September 12, 2019 Share Posted September 12, 2019 It's not a different version... So the hex bolts and side mounts are just additional equipment? Win10 i7-10700KF 32GB RTX3060 Rift S T16000M TWCS TFRP FC3 F-14A/B F-15E CA SC NTTR PG Syria Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FoxAlfa Posted September 12, 2019 Author Share Posted September 12, 2019 So the hex bolts and side mounts are just additional equipment? I think so, probably GPS mount. Here are more pictures of the HUD with minimal difference in lower and top part ------- All the people keep asking for capabilities to be modelled.... I want the limitations to be modelled.... limitations make for realistic simulation. Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in the mud, after a bit you realize the pig likes it. Long time ago in galaxy far far away: https://www.deviantart.com/alfafox/gallery Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FoxAlfa Posted October 26, 2019 Author Share Posted October 26, 2019 Smoke out of the engines should be reduces on low RPM: ------- All the people keep asking for capabilities to be modelled.... I want the limitations to be modelled.... limitations make for realistic simulation. Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in the mud, after a bit you realize the pig likes it. Long time ago in galaxy far far away: https://www.deviantart.com/alfafox/gallery Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DmitriKozlowsky Posted October 27, 2019 Share Posted October 27, 2019 ED should just rev up MiG-29G to DCS level. They already have a fairly realistic PFM for Fulcrum. They could use NATO MIG-29, from Germany, Poland as template. They have aircraft on display, and I am not certain about how many are combat coded and mission-ready. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wasserfall Posted October 27, 2019 Share Posted October 27, 2019 +1 Intel Core i5-9600K, Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO, 16GB Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro, Gigabyte GeForce RTX 2080 WINDFORCE 8G Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FoxAlfa Posted November 26, 2019 Author Share Posted November 26, 2019 another small bug... ------- All the people keep asking for capabilities to be modelled.... I want the limitations to be modelled.... limitations make for realistic simulation. Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in the mud, after a bit you realize the pig likes it. Long time ago in galaxy far far away: https://www.deviantart.com/alfafox/gallery Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FoxAlfa Posted May 31, 2020 Author Share Posted May 31, 2020 Adding radar lookdown adjustment as number 11. https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=268058 and marking 9. as fixed ------- All the people keep asking for capabilities to be modelled.... I want the limitations to be modelled.... limitations make for realistic simulation. Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in the mud, after a bit you realize the pig likes it. Long time ago in galaxy far far away: https://www.deviantart.com/alfafox/gallery Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FoxAlfa Posted June 4, 2020 Author Share Posted June 4, 2020 SPO-15 lights too dim again ------- All the people keep asking for capabilities to be modelled.... I want the limitations to be modelled.... limitations make for realistic simulation. Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in the mud, after a bit you realize the pig likes it. Long time ago in galaxy far far away: https://www.deviantart.com/alfafox/gallery Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackPixxel Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 Where do we know from that SNP only works in PPS/ZPS, but not in AVT? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarres Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 Lights too dim seems a general issue in this update. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FoxAlfa Posted June 4, 2020 Author Share Posted June 4, 2020 Where do we know from that SNP only works in PPS/ZPS, but not in AVT? It is more complex in the real aircraft, but this is just that you can't do that on FC3 aircraft standard way without the bug. I didn't check that recently, it could have been fixed. ------- All the people keep asking for capabilities to be modelled.... I want the limitations to be modelled.... limitations make for realistic simulation. Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in the mud, after a bit you realize the pig likes it. Long time ago in galaxy far far away: https://www.deviantart.com/alfafox/gallery Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackPixxel Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 I noticed with SNP that sometimes targets will only show up for a splitsecond after each radar cycle. But when I go to the normal observe mode I see them perfectly fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FoxAlfa Posted June 4, 2020 Author Share Posted June 4, 2020 I noticed with SNP that sometimes targets will only show up for a splitsecond after each radar cycle. But when I go to the normal observe mode I see them perfectly fine. Yeah, there is some blinking, I still haven't narrow it down to report it, to many variables. ------- All the people keep asking for capabilities to be modelled.... I want the limitations to be modelled.... limitations make for realistic simulation. Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling with a pig in the mud, after a bit you realize the pig likes it. Long time ago in galaxy far far away: https://www.deviantart.com/alfafox/gallery Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ironhand Posted June 4, 2020 Share Posted June 4, 2020 Where do we know from that SNP only works in PPS/ZPS, but not in AVT? No AVT in SNP for the Su-27's radar per the manual but haven't searched through the MiG-29's manual. YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCU1...CR6IZ7crfdZxDg _____ Win 10 Pro x64, ASUS Z97 Pro MoBo, Intel i7-4790K, EVGA GTX 970 4GB, HyperX Savage 32GB, Samsung 850 EVO 250 GB SSD, 2x Seagate Hybrid Drive 2TB Raid 0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now