Neuse Posted January 18, 2020 Share Posted January 18, 2020 Hey Deka, now that the bigger issues are gone can we take a look at the BRM90. It still uses the the Vikhr model of a beamrider. Wouldn't it be more appropriate to use the AGM 65 E Flight/Tracking model for them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AeriaGloria Posted January 18, 2020 Share Posted January 18, 2020 If they use Maverick flight model it won’t spin Black Shark Den Squadron Member: We are open to new recruits, click here to check us out or apply to join! https://blacksharkden.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnarchyZG Posted January 18, 2020 Share Posted January 18, 2020 If they use Maverick flight model it won’t spin So slight visual difference (not spinning, who cares you don't see it from cockpit anyway) vs totally incorrect simulation (beam riding). I don't understand the reasoning [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] MATRIC developer Check out MATRIC and forget about keyboard shortcuts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shaHeen-1 Posted January 18, 2020 Share Posted January 18, 2020 Yeah who cares about spinning lol? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Terrorban Posted January 18, 2020 Share Posted January 18, 2020 I don't think they did it only because of spinning visual effects, at least I hope not. My guess is, they did it because Vikhr missile profile behaves more like a rocket than the Maverick one so it would be easy to implement since they are already coded to fire many from one pylon where as the mavs are more about one per pylon and glide for long distance setup. Wild guess on my part because the idea of them doing it current way simply to make them spin is kind of absurd. Current Hangar : A-10C II ¦ AJS-37 ¦ A/V-8B ¦ F-14A/B ¦ F/A-18C ¦ FC3 ¦ JF-17 ¦ Ka-50 ¦ Mi-8 ¦ M2000-C ¦ SA342 ¦ UH-1H Other Modules : Combined Arms ¦ Persian Gulf TRAINED - LEARNING - UNTOUCHED - ABANDONED Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiger-II Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 LGR will miss if the laser is moved whereas LGM won't AFAIK. Laser Mavericks need a laser for targeting, but not tracking. There is also the issue of firing a salvo. I think ED need to add new weapons logic to the sim for them to be modeled accurately. Motorola 68000 | 1 Mb | Debug port "When performing a forced landing, fly the aircraft as far into the crash as possible." - Bob Hoover. The JF-17 is not better than the F-16; it's different. It's how you fly that counts. "An average aircraft with a skilled pilot, will out-perform the superior aircraft with an average pilot." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tippis Posted January 20, 2020 Share Posted January 20, 2020 I don't think so. The logic should be no different than in other laser-guided rockets such as, say, the S-25L. ❧ ❧ Inside you are two wolves. One cannot land; the other shoots friendlies. You are a Goon. ❧ ❧ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts