hooti

Hi Zusammen, vielleicht möchte sich noch jemand selbst ein Weihnachtsgeschenk gönnen, ich hätte eine Realsimulator FSSB-R3 Lightning Base abzugeben. Ist in einem super Zustand, ca. 2 Jahre alt und funktioniert einwandfrei. NP inkl. VAT und Versand damals 600 € -> VERKAUFT Bei Fragen gerne melden VG hooti

Hi NineLine, your point is totally understandable, and i can only hope that the people stop discussing based on only a feeling or if something makes sense or not. That is normally not helpful for such evidence based discussions (and this does not only apply for this topic). The problem in this specific case is, based on publicily available documents (MLU Manuals), we can see how the behavior should look like. We also mentioned the specific page where you can find the description. And this is the reason why its hard to understand that the team refers to MLU manuals and claims that it should look differently. Hopefully this is also understandable from your side. Nevertheless, I also have to admit there is still a small chance that they really changed the behavior from M3 to M4.2 and then back to M5 but to be honest, this time I have a gut feeling here Maybe you have the chance to talk to the team again about this topic and have a second look into the manuals or even better, short question to a SME what will happen if you release TMS and there is nothing to lock. Will the ellipse stay slaved to the LOS? Thank you!

It seems, from my point of view, the manual got missinterpreted by ED. They concentrated on the first part of the behaviour which is clearly "correct as is" (without the reported bug) but do not pay attention to the second part (Page 77 MLU M3 Manual). And the second part describes implicitly what should happen after TMS is released -> the FCR will try to lock within the ellipse (clear part) and if there is nothing to lock, will stay slaved to the LOS as long as no event of page 77 will happen. This part would make no sense, if you always have to do TMS FWD to slave the ellipse/FCR. And I can't imagine that this behavior has changed from M3 to M4.2 and then back to M5, as mentioned the post before.

Habe sowohl PointCtrl als auch Leapmotion -> Aktuell ist PointCtrl (noch) das klar bessere Gesamtpaket. Leap zeigt aber wo die Reise hingehen wird und das ist auch jetzt schon echt beeindruckend, wenn man in VR seine Hände komplett frei bewegen kann und auch entsprechend visualisiert bekommt. Bin echt gespannt, wie sich das weiterentwickeln wird. Bis dahin ist PointCtrl aber eine klasse Lösung

Hi Zusammen, wegen Wechsel hätte ich noch VKB-SIM T-RUDDER PEDALS MK.IV mit OVP zu verkaufen. Sind top in Schuss und funktionieren einwandfrei. Die Blackbox ist sogar noch unbenutzt. Gekauft Anfang 2020, Rechnung kann ich beilegen. VERKAUFT Bei Fragen gerne melden. VG hooti

Hi Zusammen, ich habe noch ein neues und unbenutztes PointCtrl Basis Set, dass ich gerne "weitergeben" würde. Ich hatte zwischenzeitlich bereits ein Kit von einem Staffelkollegen bekommen und daher habt ihr hier die Möglichkeit ohne mehrere Monate Wartezeit an eins ranzukommen. Auf dieses Kit hatte ich knapp 10 Monate gewartet. VERKAUFT. VG hooti

Hi Zusammen, hätte noch einen VKB MCG Pro Grip anzubieten, da ich auf den Ultimate gewechselt bin. Grip ist in einem sehr guten Zustand, siehe Bilder. NP bei VKB 175 € -> ich hätte gerne noch 100 € + Versand Bei Fragen gerne melden VG hooti VERKAUFT

Interesting, i have ordered shortly after the new preorder process (website) was possible, but got no confirmation e-mail or something else. Also tried to contact operations@pointctrl.com but no response and my spam folder was empty too. Is there a chance to check if my preorder was valid?

Same for me, i had to switch back to WMR stable and everything went back to normal.

I made the exact same observation. My performance issues are occurring above or in crowded areas. Everywhere else it's "ok". I've tried almost every workaround but still haven't found a solution. The different settings doesn't really have a positive (and negative) effect. At the moment my settings are below my settings before the update, but the fps are still worse. With 3090, 5900X, SSD, 64 GB this is really annoying

I have the exact same annoying behaviour with similiar specs: 5900X, 3090, 64Gb, SSD. CPU Frametime 7-8ms, GPU Frametime 15-16ms -> fps fluctuation between 39-45fps and a lot of stuttering. Before 2.7 there were no problems and now the performance is really messed up

I am not really sure if it was a VRAM problem, but with the 6900XT and the 3090 the problems were gone immediately. Multiplayer now works without problems and most importantly I am no longer afraid to open the f10 map. With the 3080 I had several problems (reverb bluescreens, SteamVR crashes, ...) as discussed in the other thread. In my opinion, something strange was going on with the VRAM usage of the 3080. But maybe it's just a driver problem or something else.

Maybe interesting for some, because I have tested the 3080, 6900XT and the 3090 with DCS too. My 3080 kept crashing, so I was looking for an alternative. I was most excited about the 6900XT, but I have to say that when I tested it, I was really disappointed. My own benchmarks weren't really much better than my 3080 and the "feel" (and fps, ms,..) in DCS was the same. The card that ended up staying in my PC is the 3090. First DCS run with it and I was grinning like a kid. It's interesting that it might just be a driver problem, but for now I'm really happy with the 3090. Even if it is overpriced.

Same Problems for me. Ryzen 5900X, RTX 3080, 32GB Ram, Windows 20H2 and Reverb G1. Playing Syria Map is some sort of lottery. Before the crash it often loses tracking as well and i think it got even worse since the last update. But the second part is only a „feeling“.

Ah ok, thanks for the Info. Then it is time to wait again...