Jump to content

Hulkbust44

Members
  • Posts

    1048
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Hulkbust44

  1. Well it wasn’t exactly uncommon to use it, kinda important Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  2. Wow, it’s that convoluted? Maybe the lack of MC space/processing power wouldn’t be much of an issue if the software was even remotely optimized… Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  3. Nope, target just needs to be in the ballpark of the radar azimuth as the antenna is what transmits the MDL, even with the radar off. It doesn’t really matter how the trackfile was created Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  4. All link participants will share their targets, when you have a “donor” that aircraft is allowed to contribute to your MSI track files. This is a Hornet only thing, and doesn’t exist yet… Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
  5. You can tell from DCS...which is wrong... Are you then pressing O/S?
  6. Hulkbust44

    SEAD

    Ah, I believe it should appear as NS, but it may be under the "friendly" emitter filters. Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk
  7. Hulkbust44

    SEAD

    Could you rephrase that question? Are you asking about the Hornet jammer vs the SAM Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk
  8. Right, any trackfile with radar contribution or not should be able to be set as L+S, why we're still missing this I have no idea... Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk
  9. Yeah, the other missing component is that TDC depress on a trackfile should make it the L+S, and it would be slaved via that logic. Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk
  10. It's supposed to be done via TDC depress and hold while you slew over the track, then release. The octagon should follow, that's a bug atm, but you will see SLAVE boxed. Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk
  11. What's your source on this? I've studied our Hornet model extensively, and nowhere in my readings of OFP 17C-20X have I seen any mention of this function specifically. Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk
  12. Take out the doc reference quick, there's apparently no tolerance in even mentioning it anymore on here... Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk
  13. Wait really? When was that added to the tech tree? Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk
  14. null@BIGNEWY This is incorrect, PM sent. If the radar dosen't see the target due to MLC for example, it will change the PRF to low.
  15. Flight model/FCS is WIP, This is the correct OFP and if this doesn't change when we get an official update in the FM/system we'll need to push for a bug report.
  16. This might help: courtesy of bunnyclark FA-18C_HOTAS.pdf Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk
  17. Nope, it's there to keep the SA decluttered. Remember that SCS towards the HSI/SA will swap them. Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk
  18. No, at least it shouldn't, for RTS select a different weapon and undesignate. Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk
  19. RESET is supposed to revert track designations to the system priority order. If you have an L+S and DT2 set on tracks say 4 and 5 as they are ranked, RESET will drop those designations and the rank 1 track will be the L+S. If there is an STT that target will be the L+S. (Or FLIR autotrack if there is no radar STT) This also deselects EXP, RAID, BIAS, and restores the auto scale function. Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk
  20. You can't undesignate coordinates from an IAM. If you are in TOO with a designation that data from the bomb is driving the designation, and by the logic you can't undesignate it. If you went to a new pylon without a target you would be able to. However, you can still just press TDC depress to redesignate updating the target.
  21. The MIG can still turn inside a late slat Phantom? My resident SME (F-4E and F-16C bk 30 driver) mentioned that the F-4 with it's new slats was more maneuverable than the Viper. I know the Viper tried to optimised it's STR, but comparatively was it's one circle worse than a Fishbed?
  22. Certainly just changed. Track deletion is no longer connected to hit age in any way. You can hold a track in 6B 140° INTL... This was with aging set to 2, a target at 40nm cold where it was only picked up in MED. Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk
  23. It is implemented, we don't have anything specific about it's parameters from ED though. Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk
  24. Cycling MC 2 to OFF and back should force a stores rescan. Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk
  25. No, you hold TDC depress, slew over the track, then release. Slave on the right should be boxed. The FLIR hexagon is bugged and will not follow a track without radar contribution... Sent from my moto g stylus 5G (2022) using Tapatalk
×
×
  • Create New...