Trident

Shepski: The Checksix preview mentions manual aerial-refuelling but says that 'currently' a lot of precision is required to maintain a connection. Does this mean that the hose does not allow for slight drifting by flexing (which I suspect is the reason that refueling was automatic previously)?

Ah, pity... that's what I meant originally. It'll have to wait for a naval-oriented product I guess. It is a helpful feature to have if you're into attacking ships, killing the radar(s) beforehand makes your life MUCH easier :lol:

Re: Some v1.1 questions So the missile actually hits the antenna (not the ship's hull like they currently do) and it stops transmitting? Good news :D Good, atleast we can look forward to getting this capability in the near furure :) Does this include the wings? If so that's good enough for me. Excellent! Never mind the brake, pretty redundant when all airfields are perfectly flat anyway, I was just wondering. Thanks :)

Hi, I just wanted to ask a few questions about the upcoming add-on: - With the Su-25T having proper anti-radar capability, will it be possible to correctly engage ship radars with anti-radiation missiles as in Flanker2.03a? - Will the improved avionics for the Russian fighters include the ability to engage 2 targets simultaneously with R-77 in the MiG-29S (9.13S)? Will the MFD symbology be more realistic? - Will all that debris (wings etc.) created by the new aircraft explosions actually damage you if you collide with it? - Will the improved ground procedures that Shepski talked about a while ago be implemented (you know, electrical systems power-up etc., see also the power-switch key-listing in LOMAC)? Talking of ground operations, will we get a parking brake? A rather useless feature, I know, but parking my aircraft and leaving it just like that always makes me feel uneasy ;) Thanks in advance!