Erich Alfred Hartmann

+1000,In the photo that they have put of the cockpit of the new F15, I do not identify the cockpit of an F15, I do not know if you understand me ..., it is like the advanced super hornet (the blockIII) they look like a tablet with wings, but luckily or unfortunately technology advances and that is the future

Like me, it also happens to me in cool and dark, and its line also appears to me, just as pronounced and sometimes less, I will do the tracks, when I am at home tonight

ah ok, I'll try to do it, but basically it's the screenshot, I'll still record the video I don't understand,I only play custom missions (not the mission editor) the mission customization mode within the game, you know ... where you choose how many enemy and allied units you want to have (the default mode) are not missions from the mission editor

Hello Big New, call me ignorant, but ... how is it done? I've never recorded tracks

HI Bignew, yes, the plane is perfectly aligned, since I always make sure that this procedure comes out perfect (at least something has not changed) pos: GRN countdown: ok pos: NAV the alignment has no mystery In fact, yesterday I tried and was convinced that it would go wrong, as it turns out that when activating and deactivating the AG mode several times it returned to vertical, but after a while it stayed at that angle again The maps where I play are in Caucasus, Nevada and Persian Gulf and in custom mission

well guys as the title says ..., when I go to AG mode to practice bombing with silly bombs like the Mk82 / snakeeye etcetc, the CCIP mode line does not come out vertical, the plane is perfectly aligned in case someone asks, it is a bug? If it is not a bug, what am I doing wrong? I wanted to clarify if that helps, that I do not play online, I only play custom missions, I play singleplayer offline. In case it helps.

What I am not going to do is buy a new pc, for 1500,2000 / 3000 euros for a single game, have you read my other messages? Let me explain, I play at 1080 and the simulator / game works for me at 60 fps at all times, what happens and many people with much more powerful computers are random fps drops when looking at a specific point. My pc moves well optimized software to 1080p at 60 fps without problems, the problem is not the machine, that is due to lack of optimization, in FSX for example it did not matter if it had a GTX titan, at most it works at 30 fps. What I'm going to do, if after applying vulkan the 60 fps at 1080p resolution does not remain at a stable 60 fps, maybe I would consider buying a new PC and I would not hesitate to spend such an amount of money but not for now, and I think that people have performance problems on all kinds of more powerful and less powerful PCs. what I'm going to, you can't say ... it's not going well? change pc, no, the fault lies with the devs who have not focused on optimizing, I do not have to change the machine, I repeat, if after vulkan the performance is the same, if I will consider changing the machine. Do you know why many people are poor? not because of having little money, it is because of poor economic decisions I mean all this in a good way. peace and love

Until they optimize it, little will be able to be done, in my case I get 60 fps in the air but sometimes it has fps drops when you leave the map and return to the cockpit, it stays anchored at 30 fps, or on the ground, where direct your view, then if you move the cockpit view it stabilizes at 60 fps, that is to say that it is poorly optimized, I hope that with vulkan these small fps drops will be solved, and my pc is not a nasa computer but with dcs a 1080p resolution can spare, if not directly the simulator would not work well

sorry,there was an error in the notifications

I have put it in the description of the message, but I also put it here i7-4770k Gtx 1060 6GB 16RAM 250Gb SSD

With my pc everything at the maximum default it works for me at 1080p resolution at 60 fps like butter in the air but when you are on the ground especially in Nevada both on a ramp or flying over Las Vegas it blocks at 30 fps and fluctuates (very annoying) with the configuration of the screenshot works at 60 fps with slight dips at 58/59 fps, I have not tried other configurations, if you have suggestions, let us know. in case someone is useful or has a similar pc or like mine MY PC: i7-4770k GTX 1060 6GB 16RAM SSD 250 GB

can't see the link?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GTZ5HjCR6g

same here, performance is horrible. From my point of view and personal opinion, I sincerely believe that eagle dynamics should focus on seriously optimizing the graphics engine or the base of the game, let me explain I think they should make a break in terms of creating modules (let's be honest we have modules for 7 lives) and they should focus on optimizing the graphics engine / base, I have understood and had read that it only uses one processor core, right? If so, they should work on it, and optimize the base, I had in mind to buy a new computer, but I will save money for the moment, what is the use of having a new CPU if it is going to use only one core? my current pc is more than capable of moving dcs to 1080p, I don't want more, but let's face it, the optimization is horrible. For the DEVS and users: They should put aside momentarily the creation of modules and focus 100% 100 on the base of the graphic engine and above all we users do our part and not complain that the modules have faults or some bug

Well, for you it may be worth, but I prefer the super hornet on a personal basis, because it is my favorite plane and that of many people, I suppose that the tastes of others are totally respectable, I support that someone make the super hornet or that VRS make the jump to DCS, what the hell, I'm looking forward to a quality super hornet for DCS

It is a shame, because that module had an incredible look, it would be necessary to wait for another company to make the super hornet or VRS to give way to DCS

Hi guys, a simple question, what happened to the Cortex Designs super hornet? that super hornet looked amazing someone knows?

Look,! From April 19 to May 18 all the modules for free, take the opportunity to try them all, if you can ...

I do not know if it will be an error or something but instead of the kamov 50 the one that is in free trial is the UH-1H in STEAM

+1000

It makes it easier for me, DCS+A10C=65 euros, people will buy it, and yes, the graphics engine or something that is not well optimized, the fps drops that the simulator has are not half normal in all types of PCs

The solution is the one I have said: DCS WORLD + Flaming Clifs 3 for 65 euros, or leave the modules aside momentarily and focus on the graphics engine that is the basis and the main thing so that everything works well, to which I I deny, rather ... what most of us refuse is to use the excuse to fix the graphics engine based on a monthly subscription, NO, first they prioritize the engine and if they need to do an entire rework of the graphics engine and focus on it. A somewhat stupid example: it is like the politicians, we need to raise more taxes because of our ineptitude, when they should be the ones who have to fix the problems or try to avoid them without the need to rob the citizen based on invented taxes. Let's be clear: with this example I don't mean that the Eagle team are thieves and useless. (I don't want my words to be misinterpreted)

In my case, I don't play in multiplayer mode (I don't like or like online games in general). I like to play alone offline and in silence. they want economic income? Dcs world +FC3 = 65 euros (without subscriptions or anything unusual) that is ideal.