Jump to content

J-20

Members
  • Content Count

    309
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About J-20

  • Rank
    Member

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. We really need more attacker planes. Right now, the only one we have are A-10C, AV-8. Since I heard that Deka will not make Q-5, the red side really need an attacker. Also, I hope they can make ASM for A-10A too. If Su-25T is doable, it will be great too.
  2. Recently I heard a humor that ED is considering making ASM for MiG-29A. Is there a chance to do the same for Su-25A? Su-25A is an older plane than MiG-29A. If MiG-29A is doable, there shouldn't be a problem for Su-25A, right?
  3. This is just creepy. When you told me about the cyberstalking, I thought you were joking.
  4. Read the previous comments before reply. Kamov only did a $3 million worth of wind tunnel test job.
  5. The Five Most Capable Combat Jets of the Third Generation - Part Three: Shenyang J-8 https://militarywatchmagazine.com/article/the-five-most-capable-combat-jets-of-the-third-generation-part-three-shenyang-j-8 It's an interesting read for people who are interested. Military Watch also always has interesting articles. I even found an article on J-9. It is unfortunate that it never made pass wind tunnel testing. https://militarywatchmagazine.com/article/chengdu-j-9-china-s-over-ambitious-plan-for-an-advanced-multirole-fighter-which-inspired-a-new-generation For people who understand Ch
  6. hard facts? Do you mean your presumption on how the Chinese plane should be? At least I had my data from the manufacturer. Now show me your hard facts other than your subjective opinion. Showing your that subject opinion is not hard data is NOT an insult. You don't bother me, it is you who could not accept the world being anything other than the ones in your own script. Once again, don't avoid my question. Show me the hard data to prove to us that the manufacturer pamphlet is wrong. Until then you are just showing us how childish you are. I am actually intrigued, how old are you really?
  7. :lol::lol::lol::lol: lol with nothing to add, and no way to answer my question, you result in copying my phase used against you earlier? Can't even think of an original comeback? How pity
  8. :megalol::megalol:hehe, why don't you show me something that is not "manufacturer biased" sales poster?? Beside your claim that J-8F is just modified MiG-21 comment I mean? How do you know the sales post isn't an accurate representation of the plane itself? As far as I remember, the DCS JF-17 is way better than I imaged since I only had the "manufacturer biased pamphlets" on me, which didn't told much. So why don't you show me something more trust worthy than the official military sale pamphlet? You think the international weapon sale is like how you sell lemonade on your front yard where yo
  9. Have you study any thing about radar? They are similar because that was the only way to deflect radar wave. Unless we can change the law of physics, that is the conclusion of the research will always lead, just like a wheel will always be round to work. Go home and restart your primary education you little baby. Su-57 design? J-20 came out way ahead of Su-57. Sign....... it is hard to talk to those who is living in their own little world. You are evil. lol lol
  10. Yes, your the words you used were J-8, but the context of our conversation were on J-8F. So why don't you save the effort trying to dig a deeper hole for yourself. What are you trying to do now? Go back and edit your own comment? lol.:megalol: Wait, that will leave a mark below the comment with "edited on xx/xx/xxxx". lol
  11. Guys, I was researching online and stamped on something interesting about J-8F, the plane we would all love to have. So check this out. This poster was taken from one of those air show years back, when China was trying to sell it to Pakistan. But after Pakistan found out that US had a working example of J-8II via the peace pearl project, and know J-8II's fighting character, they decided not to purchase it. Never the less, the poster showed it has a datalink. This photo shows J-8F can carry a self protection jammer pod. Judging by the shape and colour, it could be the KG300G pod.
  12. :megalol::megalol: Which part of that was "trolling"? Or did you mean you were trolling? You hated every Chinese plane, so don't pretend all of sudden you want "to see Chinese made aircraft". Here are your own words And ignorantly claim J-8F was just a modified MiG-21 :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
  13. Welcome back. Still living in your imaginary world? By the way, you still haven't answer my question from last time. "Can you show me an original designed Portugal fighter?" lol You ran from this question last time and stopped responding, can I get a straight answer now?
  14. lol, that's why you got your comment deleted? You only mentioned one time that you like Chinese made helicopter, and you only did that to avoid being noticed as sinophobia. Beside, since when did I ranting about " how different and superior Chinese versions are internally"?? You are the ignorant observer who claim that there is only some "internal difference between J-8F and MiG-21".:megalol:
  15. Feel free to just ignore him. If you analysis all his comments you will realise that he actually don't want any Chinese plane. Probably a sinophobia. By the way, can you pm me your name in your discord squadron? I can't find anyone called "TaxDollarsAtWork".
×
×
  • Create New...