Krippz

Already reported.

Chizh, The seeker FOV (Field of view) on the AMRAAM seems too large. Is this correct or will you address it in the future?

Thank you! Good luck.

J-11.

It was more draggy at mach 1 and 1.2 and less draggy in every other mach. Every missile in the game doesn't turn well at mach 1 so I really don't get your point.

I'm pretty sure much of this thread has been focused on kinematics. ED presented their CFD findings, those are in line with another CFD that was done by a member of the community. There isn't much to discuss.

https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=4346897&postcount=24 They'll do it after the AMRAAMs are done.

The objective of a simulator should be realism, not artificial nerfs and buffs.

F-14 - <64>Krippz RIO - <64C>Fox

That's very good to hear and what our simulator needs.

I don't think that's the way you should talk to a developer that took time out to respond to people in this thread and share insight. He'll get to you if he can.

When AMRAAMS are launched in TWS in the F/A-18 the defender's aircraft receives a launch warning. Attached is my track. server-20200520-141251.trk

Good post. Thanks for helping us nuggets out!

I think Wags mentioned some months back that they are overhauling the g-modeling.

That's fair. There's at least one WSO and one pilot in the community that have stated that the detection ranges are optimistic. Thanks for passing it along.

Wouldn't that be in violation of forum rule 1.16? Okay I'll cite wikipedia: Range for 5m2 aerial target is 105 km https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AN/APG-68

Attached is a screenshot and track of me being able to track and lock a transport aircraft at over 110 miles. Fighter sized targets can be detected at ranges upwards of 80 miles and tracked at 70 miles. This seems implausible for a radar of the F-16's size and power. F16_Detection_Range.trk

Full fidelity flanker please.

It's nice to have real operators come in here and tell us about the usefulness of the A2G radar or lack thereof.

Good informative post.

I would love a MiG-29.

Suit up comrade.

<64>Krippz MiG-29

100% Agreed.

I think people get too caught up in the term "Early Access": I purchased the module knowing what I would get in terms of features at release, I was fine with that because I got the chance to fly one of my favorite aircraft early. So if the cost of admission for me personally was just the features listed at inception then I would have been fine. I'm fine with them taking their time to get complex features done; I have over 1,000 hours in the Hornet already, I got my money's worth.