There are two fundamental misconceptions in the video you posted. The first is that currency functions like a commodity. A commodity is an object that possesses its own intrinsic utility value, like rice, silver, or gold. Commodities have often been used as currencies throughout history, but currencies are not inherently commodities in themselves. Functionally speaking, currencies are more or less like shares in a corporation. They represent a portion of the total market value of the issuing entity. A $100 USD bill is effectively a stock certificate entitling it's holder to whatever that proportion of the total amount of US currency in circulation can command on the open market.
The value of currency increases and decreases for the same reasons that the value of stocks increase and decrease. If the underlying value of the business increases, then the price rises, and vice-versa. The same with currencies and national economies. Similarly, if too many stocks are issued, then the value of the individual stocks become diluted. Likewise, if the treasury issues too much money, the result is monetary inflation (vs. price inflation). Central bank monetary policy is all about managing money supply and interest rates (which are akin to stock dividends) in order to keep the value of the currency stable.
The second misconception is that the federal budget is like a household budget. That is entirely untrue. A government treasury is effectively a state owned corporation, and it raises funds like any other business in order to fuel economic growth and fund operations. Of course, if a government borrows too agressively and recklessly, or if the treasury claims too great or too little a share of economic activity with its tax policies, then business will suffer.
However, government debt doesn't amount to a stack of household bills. It shows up as liabilities on the balance sheet. As long as debt doesn't grow too large relative to assets, and as long as servicing that debt doesn't become excessively expensive, then a certain amount of debt is not just normal, but healthy in a growing economy, just as it is for a growing company. Debt, in and of itself, is not a sign of fiscal irresponsibility or poor economic performance.
These are basic economic concepts, and in my estimation, anyone who doesn't understand them is participating in cryptocurrency schemes purely on the basis of blind faith.
Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk