Jump to content

Evoman

Members
  • Posts

    682
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

1 Follower

Personal Information

  • Flight Simulators
    DCS, A-10C, AJS-37 Viggen, F-14 Tomcat, F-86 Saber, L-39
  • Location
    United States

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. In case your unaware the CH-47F in currently in development by ED and it has a glass cockpit. And since the C-130 is also in development that will introduce the cargo transport mechanics.
  2. As mentioned by cfrag this mechanic would not not be worth implementing with DCS's current state. I myself have ejected many times flying over battle fields in other first person shooters. Except in those games the distances were not that big because the maps were of medium size where it was not too bad to hike it to the nearest ground vehicle to get a ride back to base.
  3. I can understand the resentment. But at least now you can look forward to a FF MiG-29A that will continue to be updated and refined just like the rest of the FF modules. So you will defiantly get your moneys worth for years to come.
  4. You should had gotten your answer as to just how unfeasible simulating the EX would be from one of those videos when they stated that "The F-15EX has one of the most ADVANCED warfare suites ever installed in a fighter"
  5. ED has mentioned in the past that they do have plans to be able to do walk arounds and then climb in.
  6. I was actually thinking of this the other day. I already have a few fighter jet t-shirts, but would like something that shows that I am a DCS pilot that specializes in a particular favorite aircraft.
  7. I think the future will get better for REDFORE vs BLUFOR battles with the addition of the Mig-17, Mig-23 and Mig-29. In my opinion the Vietnam era could be one of the most ideal eras to have a good balanced forces once the Vietnam map comes.
  8. I hope that someone creates a flyable mod of the S-3 using that AI variant. Then for it to eventually be develop into a full fidelity module.
  9. I agree that it would be more ideal to start with a medium bomber first, that will eventually evolve to large bombers. In my opinion the B-25 would be an ideal candidate to expand into multi crew medium bombers.
  10. I will now hopefully close this thread with the previous post that was perfectly fitting.
  11. The F-20 has come up on this forum multiple times. Unfortunately it has little chances of making it to DCS as a FF modules by the current developers simply because it never served with any military. There fore little data is is known about it outside of Northrop engineers and the test pilots evolved with that project. However it could be a possibility if a capable developer decides to take it on as a passion project and has luck getting a data and a license from NorthropGruman to do it.
  12. I have also thought that it would be a good idea to add earlier variants of those aircraft so that they could fit better into the cold war ear that is a more fleshed out than BVR. This is not the first or second time this topic has come up. Below is one of the most recent discussions about it that you will find interesting.
  13. This is not the first time this request has come up. Check out the below thread for some interesting info on the topic. And in reference to the F-35 you have to take into consideration that those aircraft have a ton of classified data as is while its in service. Plus another 20-30 years after its retired for that data to possibly be declassified. Then on top of that Lockheed Martin happens to own the majority of the data rights to the F-35. Which has caused a monopoly on who can service certain system on it. Which is another reason why the Air Force has already been looking for a replacement. See the below article for the full story. So its going to be a very long wait before the F-35 becomes feasible to simulate for DCS. https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/avoiding-f-35-acquisition-malpractice-aim-of-next-gen-air-dominance-fighter
  14. That is why I said "early" variants like the EA-6A not the more advanced EA-6B since most of the 6A's were retired in the 1970's.
×
×
  • Create New...