Saltat_cum_mortem

Sounds good. Looking forward to the mig-23. Sent from my Moto Z3 Play using Tapatalk

Nice find Sent from my Moto Z3 Play using Tapatalk

Yeah, I prefer being pleasantly surprised. It sure beats holding your breathe for three years. No offense to VKB of course. I'll still buy there throttle. But you know, patience is hard. Sent from my Moto Z3 Play using Tapatalk

That is beefy. Also glad to see a spot to attach the back box. Sent from my Moto Z3 Play using Tapatalk

Well if those were upgrade kits, it looks like the base and one of the circuit boards is essentially all that's updated. It looks interesting but I'm more interested in seeing more about the desk mounts. Sent from my Moto Z3 Play using Tapatalk

Direction to intercept? Sent from my Moto Z3 Play using Tapatalk

We'll see Sent from my Moto Z3 Play using Tapatalk

I disagree. I think that, after release of the A/G radar, people will come to the conclusion that the T-pod is a waste of time in deep strike and maybe interdiction strike missions. Depending on the resolution of the radar (which I clearly don't fully understand at the moment), I think these missions will be dominated by the radar. With the radar you can more easily refine your target designation and approach in spite of trees obstructing your view. This is especially true at low level. Depending on resolution and filtering, I figure the same will be true about interdiction strike missions. But, again that depends on the operator's ability to recognize columns of vehicles. In fact, the radar may make finding the columns faster than panning around with the T-pod. Having said all of that, the T-pod will always be the undisputed King of CAS due to the necessity of target discrimination via visual identification. But that doesn't degrade the usefulness of the radar in other aspects of ground attack. All of that to say that the T-pod is useful and the A/G radar should be useful. But each in its place. Sent from my Moto Z3 Play using Tapatalk

I kind of figured finances and man power were, in part, the reasons why the things you've announced haven't developed as quickly as might be expected. Regardless, I'm looking forward to seeing TECS soon . . .ish. Sent from my Moto Z3 Play using Tapatalk

Optionally you could use it on that "friendly" that keeps lobbing missiles in your general direction. Sent from my Moto Z3 Play using Tapatalk

Like I said, it's perfectly safe. You're not likely to break anything unless you're trying to. Furthermore, when I first got mine it only took three or four tries in order to get it the way I wanted it, and I think I got my time to change springs down to like two minutes or something. I personally like the soft centers that came installed in it, but I think that's a matter of taste. As for spring weights, maybe start with a pair of 40# springs in either direction and go from there. Sent from my Moto Z3 Play using Tapatalk

1. No 2. Depends on preference alone, but most recommend not exceeding 90 pounds total in either direction. 3. It's perfectly safe, but it can be a real ball ache the first couple of times. Sent from my Moto Z3 Play using Tapatalk

Every new feature is going to go through the beta branch in order to clean it up before moving it to the stable branch. Splitting up the community has nothing to do with anything. If you are willing to accept bugs then use the beta version. If they release a buggy feature into the stable version, they are going to lose customers with a low tolerance for bugs. How was that a question? Sent from my Moto Z2 Play using Tapatalk

Max flap speed is likely somewhere above 250kts. But, with your main concern being nose high attitude, coming out of the break ~160kts +/-10 sounds right for what I've been doing. Sent from my Moto Z2 Play using Tapatalk

Agreed, a little more focus air to ground instead of leaving it in the most minimalist condition possible till air to air is complete would be nice. Sent from my Moto Z2 Play using Tapatalk