Jump to content

shab249

Members
  • Posts

    182
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by shab249

  1. Yea i agree its way too much Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  2. Mum? Me? Putin? Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  3. I never had issues with my computer even in really populated servers so i dont know what's the deal with you 16 is more than enough Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  4. So you want the D? Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  5. Wow nice from who you got this from? Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  6. The amount of guys here that think they need 32 64 or even 128 is too damn high STOP THROWING YOUR MONEY AWAY FOR NOTHING 8 is good 16 is good to be ready for the future/editing you dont need more than that nobody actually use more than 16 Be smart and just monitor how much ram dcs use on your current computer it wont use more than that even if you have 1 terabyte of ram Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  7. its imposible! i can beat the p-51 but the spitfire is too good someone can show me how to?
  8. they cant (D-9) and even if it could it would be useless below 5000-6000m compared to the mw-50
  9. So you bumped a topic from 4 years ago? The aim-54 is not perfect like dcs make's him look like (The A version) had non solid state electronics *it cant really hit something maneuvering like a fighter it was meant against bombers only Its super heavy at almost 500kg which means limited number of this can be carried It can work only with the f-14 radar (and was first meant to be in the f-111 but it didnt worked out) His standoff range (pitbull) was "only" 11 miles. For his size and weight its nothing Oh and i forgot the cost Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  10. ED... the module is from 2014 right? Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  11. Ok so it can carry it Why its not in the game? Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  12. Some say the k-4 could carry them and some say it cant I know that in the cockpit we do have the buttons and indications for them so why its not in the game? Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  13. F104 Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  14. Are you talking about the 27 or 29? If it's the 29 it can use radar guided missile's too and has option (in some army's) for the lightning pod's Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  15. russia cant speak for the soviet union :) if it's true we can still see anything that russia didnt developed but the soviet union did so we cant do the su-24 mig 25 and above because russia upgraded them i just checked about the mig-23 and the last upgrade was less than 5 years before they splited:music_whistling:
  16. i found that in the F-4E original manual, F-5E pilots who take AIM-9B and maybe the J versions need to know about it?
  17. I know that the IAF is the reason they developed the 5 and we asked them to make it lighter and with more payload but it was for AA dogfights as well Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  18. As an israeli. I cummed Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  19. No no no mirage 5 is a 3 without few avionics Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  20. Thank you ill read it later it's 12:36 AM here Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
  21. so F-14 and A-4 will be nice from where you get those links anyway?
  22. i know that, but i want to read it in my phone but i cant. try it
  23. THANK YOU! It will be rude to ask you for more links? (F-4E F-104 F-105 F-106) i want to read it on my phone but the website is annoying in mobile chrome Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
×
×
  • Create New...